.\lib\rtl\largeint.c
There's a sutraction performed in your implementation. But actually it's a
logical negation (asm -> NEG; C -> ~) in this function of the low and high
part:
RtlLargeIntegerNegate()
Oliver
PS: I have no CVS access, so anyone here having it should fix this.
I created bug 585 for a blocking bug in LPC message queueing.
It seams I can't fix it. :(
There is something wrong in lpc/queue.c.
New SM that loads subsystems reading the registry config and CSR that
registers are attached to 585 (code *not* commited yet).
If fixing the LPC bug is not possible easily, I'll change SM to use a
scond thread to avoid cross calling from the same thread.
ea
Hi,
--- ea <ea(a)iol.it> wrote:
> maybe that is what I reported on the irc a few days ago (installing in
> QEMU061/Win32). Thomas could not reproduce it.
If I go through stage 2 setup quickly then it will crash. If I wait and go slowly over each page
ReactOS will not crash.
THanks
Steven
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Make Yahoo! your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
I'd like to close this discussion with a vote.
Should we allow branches (other than trunk) with mixed new development and bugfixes
unrelated to the new development that is on the branch (miscelanea branches) ?
[ ] Yes, do allow miscelanea branches
[ ] No, don't allow miscelanea branches
Casper
Hi,
currently the free handle entry list is a lifo list. This is not a good
solution for process and thread ids because a id from a currently
deleted process or thread is valid again after a very short time. I
would like it to change the free list to a fifo list by using a double
linked list. The u2 part of an entry has enough room for a list entry
instead an index.
- Hartmut
Hi.
I tested a new serial driver in a vmware with 4 serial ports.
It creates only one serial device and a symbolic link to it ("COM3");
When I write to "COM3" output goes to COM1 and mix with debug output there.
This is a bug imho.
This problem prevents ros from deleting a file/directory (observed while
running wine kernel32 reg. tests with param "path")
around line 295 in vfat\finfo.c: (svn blame says Hartmut made the last
changes around here)
------------------------------------------------
if (DispositionInfo->DeleteFile)
{
if (MmFlushImageSection (FileObject->SectionObjectPointer,
MmFlushForDelete))
{
if (FCB->OpenHandleCount > 1)
{
DPRINT1("%d %x\n", FCB->OpenHandleCount,
CcGetFileObjectFromSectionPtrs(FileObject->SectionObjectPointer));
Status = STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED;
}
else
{
FCB->Flags |= FCB_DELETE_PENDING;
FileObject->DeletePending = TRUE;
}
}
else
{
------------------------------------------------
Why deny deletion with STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED if FCB->OpenHandleCount > 1
??????
Gunnar
Hi:
>It is true that a filesystem that has a usermode component
>can not be used as a boot driver
I beleive this is not true. There are operating systems (at least I could name one) with all the drivers running in user mode leaving only a minimal kernel. Is sort of a client-server model, and yes with protection for file/folders. Now the ROS boot loader first loads kernel-hal-fat driver-... It has to, otherwise how would you load the filesystem driver? Now switching ring 0 <-> ring 3 with that in RAM... If you also load ntdll that way. Hmmm Why not? I beleive that is enought to read/write something to disk.
Regards
Waldo
--- Steven Edwards <steven_ed4153(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> --- Sylvain Petreolle <spetreolle(a)yahoo.fr> wrote:
> > we can use ext2ifs, which is GPL and works under NT4, 5, 5.1, 5.2
> > http://uranus.it.swin.edu.au/~jn/linux/ext2ifs.htm
>
> We have the ex2fsd in a branch. It much better than this driver.
>
Sorry for that , but Jakob asked for "something for NT" on *ros-dev*.
If he wrote on ros-general, I know the ext2 branch is here
(and I tested your patches in october)
To avoid this
- in trunk : we should empty the drivers/fs/ext2 and|or #error it, refering to the ext2 branch.
- Fill the ext2 web page in Wiki.
Dedicated to Arty:
no need to answer 3 times, I'm susbscribed to ros-dev :))
Kind regards,
Usurp (aka Sylvain Petreolle)
humans are like computers,
yesterday the BIOS was all
- today its just a word
>
> Is there no ext2 driver or something for NT we can use?
>
>
> regards,
> Jakob
we can use ext2ifs, which is GPL and works under NT4, 5, 5.1, 5.2
http://uranus.it.swin.edu.au/~jn/linux/ext2ifs.htm
Kind regards,
Usurp (aka Sylvain Petreolle)
humans are like computers,
yesterday the BIOS was all
- today its just a word
