Ros-dev June 2005

ros-dev@reactos.org

77 participants
161 discussions

Re: [ros-svn] [navaraf] 15830: - Unlock GDI objects by pointer, not by handle.
by Hartmut Birr 07 Jun '05

07 Jun '05

navaraf(a)svn.reactos.com wrote: >- Unlock GDI objects by pointer, not by handle. >- Fix a few invalid lock cases. >- Add support for shared GDI object locks and use it for locking surfaces. > > > Hi, I'm not able to boot ros after this changes. I've enabled all optimisation and I've set DBG=1. - Hartmut KeBugCheckWithTf at ntoskrnl\ke\catch.c:222 Page Fault Exception: 14(0) Processor: 0 CS:EIP 8:9d5c08df <win32k.sys:478df (subsys/win32k/objects/stockobj.c:147 (CreateStockObjects))> cr2 12cd93e0 cr3 78dd000 Proc: 80abc288 Pid: 74 <csrss.exe> Thrd: 80abdc10 Tid: 78 DS 10 ES 10 FS 30 GS 23 EAX: 00080019 EBX: 9d5c10d8 ECX: 870000fc EDX: 8d37d5c8 EBP: 8d37dc60 ESI: 8d37d678 ESP: 9d465c8c EDI: 9d465d74 EFLAGS: 00000246 kESP 9d465c8c kernel stack base 9d463000 Frames: <0>

1 0

RE: [hbirr] 15832: - Removed the process member from thememory area structure.
by Ge van Geldorp 07 Jun '05

07 Jun '05

Did we switch from GPL to LGPL when I wasn't looking? - * COPYRIGHT: See COPYING in the top level directory + * Copyright (C) 2002-2005 ReactOS Team (and the authors from the programmers section) + * + * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or + * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public + * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either + * version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.

2 1

Apple Keynote...
by Rick Langschultz 07 Jun '05

07 Jun '05

I have just watched the Apple Keynote about switching to intel architecture for their 2006 line. I would like to see universal binaries, or things of the sort on ReactOS.

2 1

(no subject)
by Tony Yang 07 Jun '05

07 Jun '05

1 0

RE: [ros-dev] rbuild problem
by Sylvain Petreolle 07 Jun '05

07 Jun '05

Would someone have a look on this please ?

1 0

feature request for the new build system
by Hartmut Birr 07 Jun '05

07 Jun '05

Hi, for a simple make, the build process should not check if the path %ROS_INSTALL% exists. On my system it points to a network drive, which isn't a valid path if the test machine is switched off or is running ros. - Hartmut

5 7

PPC Port of ReactOS Not Needed?
by mail.comcast.net 07 Jun '05

07 Jun '05

With the news that new Macs will be Pentium 4 based (yes, not just intel, but Pentium 4 based) I have to wonder, Would it be worthwhile to continue working on a port of ROS to PPC? Richard

7 7

Free PPC Test Systems
by Alex Ionescu 06 Jun '05

06 Jun '05

Hi, I've been recently talking to some contacts and heard of a very FOSS-friendly place where we might be able to get some PPC hardware for Art to test his PPC port on. They are Pegasos PPC, and they supply complete systems on a varity of CPU architectures. There's full Open Firmware support so it's pretty much like developing on an Apple. I've tried to contact Apple (and others amongst us have tried as well) but we haven't had much luck. Pegasos has a reputation for being much friendlier (and also much cheaper, if you want to buy one), so I suggest we give them a try and send them an e-mail about our project and how much we'd love their help (and I'm sure it's a good idea to suggest we'd put up their name on our website under a "Thank You" [by the way, we also have to thank a bunch of other companies that have donated equipment or software, afaik]). Here's their site: http://www.pegasosppc.com/ I can contact them myself, but I was thinking maybe it's better if Steven/Art/Jason (all three) handle it, since they are official Board Members plus Art is the one who will be using it. Best regards, Alex Ionescu

2 2

[Fwd: Re: [ros-svn] [hbirr] 15821: - Changed the calculation of the base address of an image section.]
by Alex Ionescu 06 Jun '05

06 Jun '05

1 0

Re: [ros-svn] [hbirr] 15818: Allocate the section object from non paged pool because the storage for a spin lock must be in non paged memory.
by Alex Ionescu 06 Jun '05

06 Jun '05

hbirr(a)svn.reactos.com wrote: >Allocate the section object from non paged pool because the storage for a spin lock must be in non paged memory. > > > > Hi, Not that I disagree with your changes (it seems they are necessary) but don't they imply a bigger architectural problem? I've checked with WinOBJ and the Section Object is allocated in paged memory... just wanted to let you know this is why I made the change. Best regards, Alex Ionescu

3 4

← Newer
1
...
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Ros-dev June 2005