Ros-dev August 2005

ros-dev@reactos.org

62 participants
118 discussions

Re: [ros-diffs] [ion] 17235: - Last patch was incomplete, apologies. SVN @ 5AM = bad idea.

by Hartmut Birr

ion(a)svn.reactos.com wrote: >- Last patch was incomplete, apologies. SVN @ 5AM = bad idea. >- Do not report that ROS is running on 0 active processors, that's a bad idea. >- Actually check the affinity mask set by NtSetInformationThread >- Fix the check in KeSetAffinityThread >- Give a valid affinity to the system thread (corresponding to the active cpu affinity set). > >This removes all bugchecks from the kernel32 thread winetest. > >Modified: trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/include/internal/ke.h >Modified: trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ke/kthread.c >Modified: trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ke/main.c >Modified: trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/psmgr.c >Modified: trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/query.c > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *Modified: trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/psmgr.c* > >--- trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/psmgr.c 2005-08-09 08:02:05 UTC (rev 17234) >+++ trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ps/psmgr.c 2005-08-09 08:50:57 UTC (rev 17235) >@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ > > > /* System threads may run on any processor. */ > RtlZeroMemory(PsInitialSystemProcess, sizeof(EPROCESS)); > > >- PsInitialSystemProcess->Pcb.Affinity = 0xFFFFFFFF; > > >+ PsInitialSystemProcess->Pcb.Affinity = KeActiveProcessors; > > > PsInitialSystemProcess->Pcb.IopmOffset = 0xffff; > PsInitialSystemProcess->Pcb.BasePriority = PROCESS_PRIO_NORMAL; > PsInitialSystemProcess->Pcb.QuantumReset = 6; > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * *This is change is possible incorrect. PsInitProcessManagment is called after the boot processor is started and before the application processors are started (on a smp machine). All system threads will only run on the boot processor. - Hartmut

19 years, 1 month

Re: [ros-dev] dma problem

by Filip Navara

19 years, 1 month

Re: [ros-diffs] [mbosma] 17213: Fix another bug thanks to GreatLord.

by Royce Mitchell III

mbosma(a)svn.reactos.com wrote: >Fix another bug thanks to GreatLord. > >Modified: trunk/reactos/lib/ddraw/main/ddraw.c > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *Modified: trunk/reactos/lib/ddraw/main/ddraw.c* > >--- trunk/reactos/lib/ddraw/main/ddraw.c 2005-08-08 16:09:48 UTC (rev 17212) >+++ trunk/reactos/lib/ddraw/main/ddraw.c 2005-08-08 16:18:44 UTC (rev 17213) >@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ > > This->lpGUID = lpGUID; > > // get the HDC > > >- This->hdc = CreateDC (L"Display", NULL, NULL, NULL); > > >+ This->hdc = GetWindowDC(GetDesktopWindow()); > > > This->Height = GetDeviceCaps(This->hdc, HORZRES); > This->Width = GetDeviceCaps(This->hdc, VERTRES); > This->Bpp = GetDeviceCaps(This->hdc, BITSPIXEL); > > I wondered about this when I first saw it. What about GetDC(NULL) ?

19 years, 1 month

Message recieved four times?

by Rick Langschultz

Are any of you receiving messages four times. I am using Microsoft Outlook 2003, and there seems to be four posts to every message.

19 years, 1 month

Bugzilla comments wrongly attributed

by Ge van Geldorp

Some of the comments in bugzilla are now attributed to "Bug Zilla" instead of the real submitter. I messed up trying to clean up an inconsistency in the database. These are the days I hate I can't just "rollback"... My apologies to those who's name got lost. Gé van Geldorp.

19 years, 1 month

ReacOS 0.2.7-RC [2] bug found

by Wesley Parish

An oops, a brain-fart. I meant 0.2.7 RC 2. Apologies. "A problem has been detected and ReactOS has been shut down to prevent damage to your computer. The bug code is undefined. Please use an existing code instead. Technical information: *** STOP: 0x00000000 (0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000000) Frames: <ntoskrnl.exe: 1bea> <ntoskrnl.exe: 1c01> <ntoskrnl.exe: 31cd3> <ntoskrnl.exe: 2eddd> <ntoskrnl.exe: 32b43> <ntoskrnl.exe: 831e> <ntoskrnl.exe: 87d5> <ntoskrnl.exe: 8bef> <ntoskrnl.exe: 4686a> <ntoskrnl.exe: 4ef95> " What I was doing? I left it sitting in qemu with the ReactOS start menu open at the Search entry while I checked my email. When I returned, I found this on the screen. Prior to that it had been working well, opening the submenus of the start menu without any problem. Wesley Parish -- Clinersterton beademung, with all of love - RIP James Blish ----- Mau e ki, he aha te mea nui? You ask, what is the most important thing? Maku e ki, he tangata, he tangata, he tangata. I reply, it is people, it is people, it is people.

19 years, 1 month

Ext2 installable FS for Windows - might be of interest

by Radovan Skolnik

I know there's Filip working on Ext2 support but to day I received a link to working read/write Ext2 IFS for Windows. See here: http://www.fs-driver.org/index.html Best regards Radovan Skolnik ------------------------------------------------------------------ Ing. Radovan Skolnik TEMPEST s.r.o. Department of Enterprise Management Plynarenska 7/B 821 09 Bratislava Slovak Republic E-mail: radovan_skolnik(a)tempest.sk www: http://www.tempest.sk Tel: +421 (2) 502 67 174 Fax: +421 (2) 502 67 100 ITIL, SLM, Networking, Telecomm, Management, CORBA, Java and XML ------------------------------------------------------------------

19 years, 1 month

Re: [ros-diffs] [ion] 17221: Fix exception handling by not reseting PreviousMode to kernel when a user-mode exception occurs. This fixes some winetest bugchecks

by Filip Navara

19 years, 1 month

ReacOS 0.2.7-RC 1 bug found

by Wesley Parish

"A problem has been detected and ReactOS has been shut down to prevent damage to your computer. The bug code is undefined. Please use an existing code instead. Technical information: *** STOP: 0x00000000 (0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000000) Frames: <ntoskrnl.exe: 1bea> <ntoskrnl.exe: 1c01> <ntoskrnl.exe: 31cd3> <ntoskrnl.exe: 2eddd> <ntoskrnl.exe: 32b43> <ntoskrnl.exe: 831e> <ntoskrnl.exe: 87d5> <ntoskrnl.exe: 8bef> <ntoskrnl.exe: 4686a> <ntoskrnl.exe: 4ef95> " What I was doing? I left it sitting in qemu with the ReactOS start menu open at the Search entry while I checked my email. When I returned, I found this on the screen. Prior to that it had been working well, opening the submenus of the start menu without any problem. Wesley Parish -- Clinersterton beademung, with all of love - RIP James Blish ----- Mau e ki, he aha te mea nui? You ask, what is the most important thing? Maku e ki, he tangata, he tangata, he tangata. I reply, it is people, it is people, it is people.

19 years, 1 month

Re: [ros-diffs] [greatlrd] 17219: Add a check to see if surface can be create, it return it can be create, but still createsurface return invaild param

by Royce Mitchell III

greatlrd(a)svn.reactos.com wrote: >Add a check to see if surface can be create, it return it can be create, but still createsurface return invaild param > >Modified: trunk/reactos/lib/ddraw/main/surface.c > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *Modified: trunk/reactos/lib/ddraw/main/surface.c* > >--- trunk/reactos/lib/ddraw/main/surface.c 2005-08-08 18:59:56 UTC (rev 17218) >+++ trunk/reactos/lib/ddraw/main/surface.c 2005-08-08 21:29:25 UTC (rev 17219) >@@ -63,12 +63,26 @@ > > CreateData.dwSCnt = 1; > CreateData.lplpSList = &pLocal; > > > >- if(This->owner->DriverCallbacks.DdMain.CreateSurface (&CreateData) != DDHAL_DRIVER_HANDLED) >- return DDERR_INVALIDPARAMS; > > >+ DDHAL_CANCREATESURFACEDATA CanCreateData; >+ memset(&CanCreateData, 0, sizeof(DD_CANCREATESURFACEDATA)); >+ CanCreateData.lpDD = &This->owner->DirectDrawGlobal; >+ CanCreateData.lpDDSurfaceDesc = (DDSURFACEDESC*)pDDSD; > > > > > >+ >+ if (This->owner->DriverCallbacks.DdMain.CanCreateSurface (&CanCreateData) == DDHAL_DRIVER_NOTHANDLED) >+ return DDERR_INVALIDPARAMS; >+ > > > if(CreateData.ddRVal != DD_OK) > > shouldn't this be "if(CanCreateData.ddRVal != DD_OK)" ??? >+ return CanCreateData.ddRVal; >+ >+ >+ if(This->owner->DriverCallbacks.DdMain.CreateSurface (&CreateData) == DDHAL_DRIVER_NOTHANDLED) >+ return DDERR_INVALIDPARAMS; >+ >+ if(CreateData.ddRVal != DD_OK) > > > return CreateData.ddRVal; > > > >+ > > > OutputDebugString(L"This does not get hit."); > > return DD_OK; > >

19 years, 1 month

← Newer
1
...
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Ros-dev August 2005