Good old patch seems ok to me.
Kind regards,
Sylvain Petreolle
Support artists, not multinationals - http://Iwouldntsteal.net
Supportez les artistes, pas les multinationales - http://Iwouldntsteal.net
----- Message d'origine ----
> De : Pierre SCHWEITZER <heis_spiter(a)hotmail.com>
> À : ReactOS Development List <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
> Envoyé le : Vendredi, 17 Octobre 2008, 14h37mn 51s
> Objet : Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [pschweitzer] 36771: Apply fix at the right place.......
>
>
> Shamefully, yes.
> I didn't find good programme to do it under Linux. Speaking of that, if someone
> using Linux could give me some pieces of advice about GUI svn clients under
> Linux, I would be glad :).
> TIA,
> Pierre
> ----------------------------------------
> > From: aleksey(a)reactos.org
> > Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 10:44:46 +0400
> > To: ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> > Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [pschweitzer] 36771: Apply fix at the
> right place.......
> >
> > Are you merging manually?
> >
> > On Oct 16, 2008, at 10:21 PM, pschweitzer(a)svn.reactos.org wrote:
> >
> >> Author: pschweitzer
> >> Date: Thu Oct 16 13:21:05 2008
> >> New Revision: 36771
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=36771&view=rev
> >> Log:
> >> Apply fix at the right place.......
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ros-dev mailing list
> > Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Inédit ! Des Emoticônes Déjantées! Installez les dans votre Messenger !
> http://www.ilovemessenger.fr/Emoticones/EmoticonesDejantees.aspx
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Are you merging manually?
On Oct 16, 2008, at 10:21 PM, pschweitzer(a)svn.reactos.org wrote:
> Author: pschweitzer
> Date: Thu Oct 16 13:21:05 2008
> New Revision: 36771
>
> URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=36771&view=rev
> Log:
> Apply fix at the right place.......
Why do you need to publically state it was broken and who broke it?
Does it make you feel more important and help to boost your ego?
-----Original Message-----
From: ros-diffs-bounces(a)reactos.org [mailto:ros-diffs-bounces@reactos.org] On Behalf Of sginsberg(a)svn.reactos.org
Sent: 16 October 2008 21:02
To: ros-diffs(a)reactos.org
Subject: [ros-diffs] [sginsberg] 36773: - Unbreak GetTextFaceA/W, broken since 28730 by GreatLord
Author: sginsberg
Date: Thu Oct 16 15:02:22 2008
New Revision: 36773
URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=36773&view=rev
Log:
- Unbreak GetTextFaceA/W, broken since 28730 by GreatLord
Modified:
trunk/reactos/dll/win32/gdi32/objects/text.c
Modified: trunk/reactos/dll/win32/gdi32/objects/text.c
URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/reactos/dll/win32/gdi32/objects/te…
==============================================================================
--- trunk/reactos/dll/win32/gdi32/objects/text.c [iso-8859-1] (original)
+++ trunk/reactos/dll/win32/gdi32/objects/text.c [iso-8859-1] Thu Oct 16 15:02:22 2008
@@ -358,20 +358,24 @@
* @implemented
*/
INT
-STDCALL
+WINAPI
GetTextFaceW(HDC hDC,
- int nCount,
- LPWSTR lpFaceName)
-{
- INT retValue = 0;
- if ((!lpFaceName) || (nCount))
- {
- retValue = NtGdiGetTextFaceW(hDC,nCount,lpFaceName,0);
+ INT nCount,
+ PWSTR pFaceName)
+{
+ INT retValue;
+
+ if ((pFaceName && nCount) ||
+ !(pFaceName && nCount))
+ {
+ retValue = NtGdiGetTextFaceW(hDC, nCount, pFaceName, 0);
}
else
{
SetLastError(ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER);
- }
+ retValue = 0;
+ }
+
return retValue;
}
Isnt that condition always true ?
+ if ((pFaceName && nCount) ||
+ !(pFaceName && nCount))
Kind regards,
Sylvain Petreolle
Support artists, not multinationals - http://Iwouldntsteal.net
Supportez les artistes, pas les multinationales - http://Iwouldntsteal.net
Well, we can't actually delete ncpa, it just needs to be rewritten to use the netshell library instead.
-----Original Message-----
From: ros-diffs-bounces(a)reactos.org [mailto:ros-diffs-bounces@reactos.org] On Behalf Of janderwald(a)svn.reactos.org
Sent: 15 October 2008 18:21
To: ros-diffs(a)reactos.org
Subject: [ros-diffs] [janderwald] 36762: - Implement Advanced Status IP Information Dialog - Import language strings from netcfgx - Add icon group (32x32) - ncpa is now a candidate for deletion
- ncpa is now a candidate for deletion
If i may say anything, I dont think its a good idea to force NET 3.5
dependency. It`ll reduce the software usability range as not everyone is
willing to upgrade from NET 2.0
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:11:16 +0100
From: "gedmurphy" <gedmurphy(a)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [gschneider] 36737: RosDbg Part
3/3: - Named pipe implementation based on .net namespace IO.Pipes
with
support of threads - Previous win32 test version would strip random
characters from debug messages and crash on entering kdbg
(related t
To: <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
Message-ID: <001901c92d1c$083d7770$18b86650$@com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I'd originally refrained from doing it this way, using pinvoke instead to
keep .net 2.0 compatibility.
Using classes such as NamedPipeServerStream forces a .net 3.5 dependency. Is
this ok with everyone?
Ged.