Again its happening....pls don't repeat..
Sent from my Windows Phone
------------------------------
From: Pierre Schweitzer
Sent: 14-10-2013 AM 02:58
To: ros-dev(a)reactos.org
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] reactos.org is down
We're back online.
On 13/10/2013 22:51, Pierre Schweitzer wrote:
The faulty server is being replaced at the moment.
On 13/10/2013 19:52, Pierre Schweitzer wrote:
Hi,
this is known issue (which has been handled 13 minutes after it
happened - just for the record ;-)). Unfortunately, so far, it is not
going very well.
This affects: www.reactos.org, jira.reactos.org,
dev.reactos.org,code.reactos.org, ns1.reactos.org (use NS2 for the
moment).
We're sorry for the caused inconvenience.
With my best regards,
Pierre
On 13/10/2013 18:20, ????????? wrote:
reactos.org is down
--
? ?????????? ???????????, ?????????.
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing
listRos-dev@reactos.orghttp://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing
listRos-dev@reactos.orghttp://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing
listRos-dev@reactos.orghttp://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
--
Pierre Schweitzer<pierre at reactos.org>
System Administrator
ReactOS Foundation
Hello!
I would like to inject more life into our branches and hence need to
remove as much dead bodies from that area as possible. And I need your
feedback!
Please comment on that list. like - needs to be merged, useless, could
be deleted.
aicom-hardware-fun
"Branch for my hardware support work and other stuff". Last commit 17th
of May, 2010. Bring back Cromwell as a temporary USB stack until
mjmartin finishes the new one, Implement missing storage stack drivers
(storport, ataport, etc), Work more on the PnP manager.
Obsolete?
aicom-network-branch
Last commit was 4th of August, 2011. Another branch for networking
fixes. "If someone wants to delete aicom-network-fixes, they are welcome to"
alex-network-branch
Last commit was 24th of December, 2006. Some parts are still not merged.
What a shame!
arty-newcc
New CC implementation by arty. It stays.
arty-stable
Arty - do you need it? No problem in keeping it, if you need it.
arwinss
Aleksey - do you need it? Yes I do!! :-)
audio-bringup
Johannes? Last commit 26 of April, 2011.
c++-bringup
Very promising name and just one commit by jgardou, 8th of March, 2012.
Jerome?
cmake-bringup
I think we switched to CMake already. Any reason to keep this branch?
dib_rewrite
Timo's great work.
GSoC_2011
Five subbranches. What's their status? Were they all merged?
icu4ros-bringup
Empty branch. Amine, would you comment whether it's necessary?
iut-mmc
Pierre?
jcatena-branch
MSVC work. Needed?
kd++
By Hermes. I think, it's needed.
lean-explorer
Lean explorer by Martin Fuchs. Last touched in 2006.
nocc
Special "nocc" cache manager. It stays.
nslookup
I guess lsuggs gave up on that. But the idea was nice.
ntvdm
We all know [TheFlash]. Stable progress. Good work.
nyadav-audio-branch
Last commit dates to year 2011. Nyadav?
olpc
One awesome Laptop Per one awesome Child. We can keep it a bit more for
historical reasons.
pierre-fsd
Pierre's presumably great work.
reactx
GreatLord's work on DirectX. Status unknown. Sylvain?
ros-amd64-bringup
Timo - is it still relevant, or did you already merge it in trunk?
ros-csrss
Last commit says "Ready for merging (TM) :)". ORLY? :-)
shell32_new-bringup
Mr. Mihail, you around? Anyone knows state of that work?
sspi-bringup
Samuel? What's with that branch?
tcp-rewrite-branch
LWIP. I think it's integrated into trunk long time ago? Last commit -
year 2010
the-real-msvc
KJK's work which stopped in 2008. Anyone could comment whether there is
anything we haven't achieved with CMake yet?
Tree-restructure-test
Playground for restructuring the tree. "Let's reshuflle the files and
directories and that makes our OS more stable and usable". Last commit
was almost exactly 3 years ago.
usb-bringup-trunk
Johannes? Still need that?
vs_jc
jjones? Do you plan to continue working on that?
wlan-bringup
Cameron, how's it going?
And the problems that were present at that time (rbuild to cmake migration
etc...) are solved now...
H.
-----Message d'origine-----
De : ros-dev-bounces(a)reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] De la
part de Ged Murphy
Envoyé : mardi 8 octobre 2013 19:38
À : 'ReactOS Development List'
Objet : Re: [ros-dev] Branches status & cleanup
Yes! This is such an obvious improvement, I'm surprised it's still not
widely accepted.
An epic mail from Timo explaining the current tree layout
https://www.reactos.org/archives/public/ros-dev/2010-July/013278.html
For anyone still interested in reading our rants, here's the start of the
original mailing list convo
https://www.reactos.org/archives/public/ros-dev/2010-July/013257.html
-----Original Message-----
From: ros-dev-bounces(a)reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] On
Behalf Of Hermès BÉLUSCA - MAÏTO
Sent: 08 October 2013 17:47
To: 'ReactOS Development List'
Subject: [SPAM]Re: [ros-dev] Branches status & cleanup
> Tree-restructure-test
> Playground for restructuring the tree. "Let's reshuflle the files and
directories and that makes our OS more stable and usable". Last commit was
almost exactly 3 years ago.
I'm personally very interested in this thing (cf.
http://www.reactos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=102258&sid=ef8d6c9a27f9e3800b7d
ff87afdc5919 and OF COURSE http://www.reactos.org/wiki/Techwiki:File_Layout
) which aims at bringing modularity.
Cheers,
Hermès.
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
You are implementing part of ReactOS so you can't just silently
relicense your code in one commit to a license which is incompatible
with ReactOS aims and goals.
At the very least, I would appreciate a discussion with our team
regarding this before doing such commits.
Please revert. The runtime linking exception was added for a reason, not
for amusement or RMS trolling. RMS is unhappy either way (not that I
care about his opinion :).
Regards,
Aleksey Bragin
On 01.10.2013 2:01, aandrejevic(a)svn.reactos.org wrote:
> Author: aandrejevic
> Date: Mon Sep 30 22:01:38 2013
> New Revision: 60485
>
> URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=60485&view=rev
> Log:
> [SOFT386]
> Change the license of Soft386 to GPLv2. The previous license was also
> GPLv2, but it had a runtime linking exception. The new license is the
> original GPLv2 with no exceptions.
>
>
> Added:
> branches/ntvdm/lib/soft386/COPYING (with props)
> Modified:
> branches/ntvdm/lib/soft386/common.c
> branches/ntvdm/lib/soft386/common.h
> branches/ntvdm/lib/soft386/common.inl
> branches/ntvdm/lib/soft386/opcodes.c
> branches/ntvdm/lib/soft386/opcodes.h
> branches/ntvdm/lib/soft386/opgroups.c
> branches/ntvdm/lib/soft386/opgroups.h
> branches/ntvdm/lib/soft386/soft386.c
>
