Hey,
since we skipped the meeting this week, I propose we do make a joint
November-December meeting somewhere in the middle of December. (as we
did in the previous year too).
How about 18th of December?
Regards,
Aleksey Bragin
The one who does it - please make sure to stick to the appropriate
Service Pack version too.
Regards,
Aleksey Bragin
On 29.11.2014 2:19, hbelusca(a)svn.reactos.org wrote:
> Author: hbelusca
> Date: Fri Nov 28 23:19:25 2014
> New Revision: 65519
>
> URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=65519&view=rev
> Log:
> [WIN32K][ROSTESTS]
> So...
> ... first of all NtUserQueryInformationThread takes only 4 parameters in Win2k3 so do it as well...
> ... and since we claim at being compatible with Win2k3 (and not XP), one **MUST** review **ALL** our win32k exports, in win32ss/w32ksvc.db database first, and then in our w32kdll apitests !!!!!
> But I won't do it !
>
Hi !
While searching for something I stumbled upon this :
http://books.google.fr/books?id=YjwKAwAAQBAJ
<http://books.google.fr/books?id=YjwKAwAAQBAJ&pg=RA1-PA331&lpg=RA1-PA331&dq=
reactos+shell+new&source=bl&ots=D1hNcK_QQx&sig=n95n-VyBUgC326b3vbqg6p1QgXU&h
l=fr&sa=X&ei=7VZ3VN-5O8viaqbSgSg&ved=0CEgQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=reactos%20shell
%20new&f=false>
&pg=RA1-PA331&lpg=RA1-PA331&dq=reactos+shell+new&source=bl&ots=D1hNcK_QQx&si
g=n95n-VyBUgC326b3vbqg6p1QgXU&hl=fr&sa=X&ei=7VZ3VN-5O8viaqbSgSg&ved=0CEgQ6AE
wCQ#v=onepage&q=reactos%20shell%20new&f=false
Read section: Creating a Custom Shell. They use ReactOS (and RosBE 1.5, a
piece of history ^^) for their purpose :D
Hermès.
Hey Pierre!
This flag
> + if (DeviceExt->VolumeFcb->Flags & VCB_CLEAR_DIRTY)
> + {
> + /* Set clean shutdown bit */
> + Status = GetNextCluster(DeviceExt, 1, &eocMark);
> + if (NT_SUCCESS(Status))
> + {
> + eocMark |= DeviceExt->CleanShutBitMask;
> + if (NT_SUCCESS(WriteCluster(DeviceExt, 1, eocMark)))
and that one
> + DeviceExt->VolumeFcb->Flags &= ~VCB_IS_DIRTY;
> + }
> + }
> +
> /* Flush volume & files */
> VfatFlushVolume(DeviceExt, (PVFATFCB)FileObject->FsContext);
>
>
>
don't really seem to match. Or is the former a part of a OR combination
defining the latter ?
Cheers.
Jérôme.
Hi all !
In the forums some spokesperson of an Indian company offering services
related to FOSS wants to add us to their online shop, see
http://www.reactos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=13
<http://www.reactos.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=13780> &t=13780 for more
information. What do you think about this? How should we react? Should we
make clearer our line of conduct about such kind of things?
Cheers,
Hermès.
On 2014-11-23 10:49, pschweitzer(a)svn.reactos.org wrote:
> + ASSERT(NT_SUCCESS(RtlUpcaseUnicodeString(&IntFileName, FileName, TRUE)));
You need NT_VERIFY here or this will break debug builds.
Heheh, who could it be... ^^
It was always a event to watch you two arguing. ^^
Am 23.11.2014 21:57 schrieb Alex Ionescu <ionucu(a)videotron.ca>:
>
> I'm just going to chime in here and confirm that Timo does indeed own a master's diploma on surviving pissing contests, taught by the greatest master there ever was.
>
> Best regards,
> Alex Ionescu
>
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Timo Kreuzer <timo.kreuzer(a)web.de> wrote:
>>
>> Am 22.11.2014 11:39, schrieb Love Nystrom:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2014-11-21 04.00, Timo Kreuzer wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Am 20.11.2014 14:18, schrieb Love Nystrom:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Well... Actually not exactly the same.. ;)
>>>>> "if (f != FALSE)" requires an explicit comparison with a second operand,
>>>>
>>>> No, it does not. It requries the compiler to generate code that executes the following statement, when f is not 0.
>>>
>>>
>>> I suspect we look at it from two different viewpoints here..
>>> Yours is "C centric" and mine is "object code centric".
>>> You talk about what the compiler is required to do,
>>> and I talk about what comes out at the end of compilation.
>>
>> And what comes out at the end of the compilation is what the compiler creates. And the compiler is following the rules of the C standard and the rules of logic.
>> You claimed '"if (f != FALSE)" requires an explicit comparison with a second operand,' and that is factually wrong. No matter whether you are looking at it from the compiler perspective or from the perspective of an expressionist painter living in a yellow tree house on the bottom of Lake Tanganyika.
>>
>>>
>>> And.. dear friend.. don't turn this into a pissing contest.
>>
>> Don't even get me started. I battled the grand master and I survived.
>>
>>
>>> Let's check the egos in with the coat check girl at the entrance.
>>> May I ask how old you are?
>>
>> Are we talking about age or maturity?
>>
>> We better end this discussion, it's not leading anywhere. And you don't want me to turn into the Grinch and steal your Christmas.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Timo
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>
>