Hi all!
I have to do a semester project on operating systems in my university. In GSoC 2017 ideas there is problem called «Bluetooth stack». So, is this problem already solved? If not, then could anyone tell me more about it?
Sincerely,
Alexandr Tsukanov
Hi all!
Let me invite you to the monthly status meeting taking place on
Thursday, August 31, 19:00 UTC.
As always, you will get credentials for our private IRC server shortly
before the meeting.
Agenda proposals so far include:
- Short report from my side regarding the Hackfest
- Git/GitHub migration in September/October
- Finalizing the 0.4.6 release, possibly planning 0.4.7
Please post any additional agenda proposals here.
Also don't forget that we're in the final week of GSoC :)
Mentors, now that all code has been submitted, don't forget about
evaluating your students!
See you on Thursday!
Colin
1. Send a mail to the list unsubscribe address, which will be of the
form LISTNAME-leave@DOMAIN. The subject and body of this message will be
ignored, so it doesn't matter what you put there.
not sure if you found out this yet. Quick google for mailman, which seems
to be what is used :)
2017-08-20 19:39 GMT+02:00 gmusume <gmusume(a)correo.ugr.es>:
>
> hi I want undelate of the group
> thank
>
>
> Enviado desde mi smartphone Samsung Galaxy.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
Hi all!
I've held a presentation at Hackfest today regarding Licensing Best
Practices, different positions about the GPL and its influence, and ways
to improve ReactOS' conformance with all involved licenses.
I think we should treat this subject even more seriously than others,
given that we are an Open-Source project trying to provide an
alternative to a proprietary product. Also licensing questions arise
from time to time, which is why we should collect some answers.
Please watch the video at https://youtu.be/OTVVz9VLisU or see the slides
at
https://svn.reactos.org/press-media/trunk/Events/2017%20-%20Hackfest/Licens…
Discussions are open now! :)
But if there are no objections, let's introduce SPDX license headers,
.ABOUT files, and a complete license list as soon as possible.
Cheers,
Colin
Hey Eric,
The Battery icon, Hotplug icon and Quick Launch toolbars are currently
developed as part of the Google Summer of Code "Taskbar Shell Extensions
for ReactOS" project.
Summer of Code ends next week, so you are welcome to join the Code
Review at https://code.reactos.org. I guess CR-122 will be shortly
updated with the latest changes there.
Let's try to not duplicate efforts here ;)
Best regards,
Colin
I have recently added ReactOS as a distribution into Wine Application
Compatibility database as ReactOS uses most of Wine components.
ReactOS-Windows incompatibilities can now be tracked like Wine-Windows
incompatibilies.
Why not Monero too?
Sent from UNKNOWN SMARTPHONE - K91820
-------- Messaggio originale --------
Da: Erkin Alp Güney <erkinalp9035(a)gmail.com>
Data: 13/07/17 21:52 (GMT+01:00)
A: ros-dev(a)reactos.org
Oggetto: [ros-dev] Ethereum for fundraiser
Ethereum is a decentralised cryptocurrency based on proof of work and
proof of stake consensus with Turing-complete scripting. Utilising
Ethereum for fundraiser will allow us to remove the middlemen from
raising funds and allow us to distribute them more directly. I want to
be first contract programmer for ReactOS ethereum account. Any kind of
release schemes may be developed. However, this will need detailed
discussion and official approval first.
Yours, faithfully
Erkin Alp
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
I would strongly suggest using one master repo. Multi-repo projects and
their brethren are a mess.
Best regards,
Alex Ionescu
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 1:18 PM, David Quintana (gigaherz) <
gigaherz(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> We have! If you look at Colin's email, it has a link to a google doc, we
> list Repo in it, and why we think it's not fit for our use :)
>
> That aside, I had a new idea, which I mentioned on IRC. I have added it to
> the document.
>
> On 2 August 2017 at 11:52, Alexander Sh. <chaez.san(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Have a look at Repo: https://code.google.com/archive/p/git-repo/
>> It is used by Android devs.
>>
>> 2 авг. 2017 г. 12:28 пользователь "David Quintana (gigaherz)" <
>> gigaherz(a)gmail.com> написал:
>>
>> The issue comes when we have to do regression-testing. We would need a
>>> tool that knows how to match up core, system, tests, ... otherwise
>>> debugging regressions is going to be hellish.
>>>
>>> On 2 August 2017 at 11:17, Alexander Sh. <chaez.san(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Since we have RosBE, we can have multiple repositories without actually
>>>> binding them and download them on demand. Or we can make a build script for
>>>> every new small module that downloads (clones) repos it needs.
>>>>
>>>> 2 авг. 2017 г. 11:41 пользователь "Colin Finck" <colin(a)reactos.org>
>>>> написал:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all!
>>>>
>>>> After David has successfully tested a first SVN -> Git conversion of
>>>> our repo, here comes the next challenge: Finding a way to preserve our
>>>> current modularization into reactos, rosapps, rostests and paving the way
>>>> for even more modularization.
>>>> My vision for the future is a small "core" repo that only contains our
>>>> host tools and SDK. We could also split off subprojects like fast486/ntvdm
>>>> or Paint into individual repos. Now that Microsoft has abandoned them under
>>>> Windows, they may individually attract developers who would never hack on
>>>> the entire ReactOS repo. Furthermore, 3rd party components could be
>>>> imported through their repo instead of copy-pasting their code without
>>>> history (as we do now).
>>>> Even if that vision is a distant goal, the technology for it is already
>>>> required for a reactos, rosapps, rostests modularization.
>>>>
>>>> Isn't that a perfect scenario for Git submodules?
>>>> Not sure: I'm not aware that they support the concept of optional
>>>> modules. You could only check out the "core" repo with all defined
>>>> submodules. This would make it impossible to use "core" only to build
>>>> Paint. There also seem to be other drawbacks when using submodules:
>>>> https://codingkilledthecat.wordpress.com/2012/04/28/why-your
>>>> -company-shouldnt-use-git-submodules/
>>>>
>>>> Alternatives like Git subtrees, Google Repo, and Gitslave exist, but
>>>> there is even less information about them. Furthermore, I think a good
>>>> integration into GUI tools like TortoiseGit is also a requirement for most
>>>> of us.
>>>>
>>>> David and I have started to write down our findings:
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ey1xdS_0GcG7p7ZgHZBh4A3V
>>>> Mq2uxyw5MpnUXbT8z6w/edit
>>>> Your input on this is very welcome!
>>>>
>>>> I guess any migration to Git is blocked before we have a solution here.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Colin
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>>>> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>>>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>>>> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>>>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>>> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>
Hi all!
We're going to have the missed monthly status meeting for July tomorrow.
Time will be 19:00 UTC as always and you will get your credentials
shortly before the meeting.
Agenda proposals so far include:
- The 0.4.6 release
- The upcoming Hackfest
- Design of the RAPPS setup mode
Please post any additional agenda proposals here.
See you tomorrow!
Colin
Since we have RosBE, we can have multiple repositories without actually
binding them and download them on demand. Or we can make a build script for
every new small module that downloads (clones) repos it needs.
2 авг. 2017 г. 11:41 пользователь "Colin Finck" <colin(a)reactos.org> написал:
Hi all!
After David has successfully tested a first SVN -> Git conversion of our
repo, here comes the next challenge: Finding a way to preserve our current
modularization into reactos, rosapps, rostests and paving the way for even
more modularization.
My vision for the future is a small "core" repo that only contains our host
tools and SDK. We could also split off subprojects like fast486/ntvdm or
Paint into individual repos. Now that Microsoft has abandoned them under
Windows, they may individually attract developers who would never hack on
the entire ReactOS repo. Furthermore, 3rd party components could be
imported through their repo instead of copy-pasting their code without
history (as we do now).
Even if that vision is a distant goal, the technology for it is already
required for a reactos, rosapps, rostests modularization.
Isn't that a perfect scenario for Git submodules?
Not sure: I'm not aware that they support the concept of optional modules.
You could only check out the "core" repo with all defined submodules. This
would make it impossible to use "core" only to build Paint. There also seem
to be other drawbacks when using submodules: https://codingkilledthecat.wordpress.com/2012/04/28/why-your-company-shouldnt-use-git-submodules/
Alternatives like Git subtrees, Google Repo, and Gitslave exist, but there
is even less information about them. Furthermore, I think a good
integration into GUI tools like TortoiseGit is also a requirement for most
of us.
David and I have started to write down our findings:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ey1xdS_0GcG7p7ZgHZBh4A3V
Mq2uxyw5MpnUXbT8z6w/edit
Your input on this is very welcome!
I guess any migration to Git is blocked before we have a solution here.
Cheers,
Colin
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Hi all!
After David has successfully tested a first SVN -> Git conversion of our
repo, here comes the next challenge: Finding a way to preserve our
current modularization into reactos, rosapps, rostests and paving the
way for even more modularization.
My vision for the future is a small "core" repo that only contains our
host tools and SDK. We could also split off subprojects like
fast486/ntvdm or Paint into individual repos. Now that Microsoft has
abandoned them under Windows, they may individually attract developers
who would never hack on the entire ReactOS repo. Furthermore, 3rd party
components could be imported through their repo instead of copy-pasting
their code without history (as we do now).
Even if that vision is a distant goal, the technology for it is already
required for a reactos, rosapps, rostests modularization.
Isn't that a perfect scenario for Git submodules?
Not sure: I'm not aware that they support the concept of optional
modules. You could only check out the "core" repo with all defined
submodules. This would make it impossible to use "core" only to build
Paint. There also seem to be other drawbacks when using submodules:
https://codingkilledthecat.wordpress.com/2012/04/28/why-your-company-should…
Alternatives like Git subtrees, Google Repo, and Gitslave exist, but
there is even less information about them. Furthermore, I think a good
integration into GUI tools like TortoiseGit is also a requirement for
most of us.
David and I have started to write down our findings:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ey1xdS_0GcG7p7ZgHZBh4A3VMq2uxyw5MpnUXbT…
Your input on this is very welcome!
I guess any migration to Git is blocked before we have a solution here.
Cheers,
Colin
Hello,
After recent changes in explorer, comctl32 and uxtheme the state of themes in reactos was improved a lot. I would like to ask your opinions about enabling themes in 3rd stage. It is also possible to have an option in 2nd stage to select if we want 3rd stage to have themes enabled. Do you think this should be enabled by default or not? All ideas are welcome. My intention is to complete it ASAP so that it can make in the release.
Thanks,
Giannis Adamopoulos
I'd vote for a page in 2nd stage.
If we would make it by default then only in the releases.
Am 31.07.2017 16:31 schrieb "Giannis Adamopoulos" <
giannis.adamopoulos(a)reactos.org>:
Hello,
After recent changes in explorer, comctl32 and uxtheme the state of themes
in reactos was improved a lot. I would like to ask your opinions about
enabling themes in 3rd stage. It is also possible to have an option in 2nd
stage to select if we want 3rd stage to have themes enabled. Do you think
this should be enabled by default or not? All ideas are welcome. My
intention is to complete it ASAP so that it can make in the release.
Thanks,
Giannis Adamopoulos
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
I didnt say so, lol
El 31/07/2017 20:38, "Giannis Adamopoulos" <giannis.adamopoulos(a)reactos.org>
escribió:
So you volunteer to create a theme?
Hermès BÉLUSCA-MAÏTO <hermes.belusca(a)sfr.fr> wrote on Mon, July 31st, 2017,
6:24 PM:
> What about the « Whistler » - like theme ? ^^
>
>
>
> H.
>
>
>
> De : Ros-dev [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] De la part de Mark
Jansen
> Envoyé : lundi 31 juillet 2017 17:18
> À : ReactOS Development List
> Objet : Re: [ros-dev] Enabling themes in 3rd stage
>
>
>
> I like this theme!
>
>
>
> Op 31 jul. 2017 16:44 schreef "Ged Murphy" <gedmurphy.maillists(a)gmail.com
>:
>
> A link to the theme I mentioned would probably help...
> http://aportz19.deviantart.com/art/Basic-Lite-and-Basic-
8-Visual-Style-for-Windows-XP-393826050
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ged Murphy [mailto:gedmurphy.maillists@gmail.com]
> Sent: 31 July 2017 15:43
> To: 'ReactOS Development List' <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
> Subject: RE: [ros-dev] Enabling themes in 3rd stage
>
> Do you have some pics??
>
> I've always been a big fan of seeing the Basic Lite theme being on by
default, which would give ros a much more modern look and feel.
> We're missing the start menu implementation for this though.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ros-dev [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] On Behalf Of Giannis
Adamopoulos
> Sent: 31 July 2017 15:29
> To: ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> Subject: [ros-dev] Enabling themes in 3rd stage
>
> Hello,
> After recent changes in explorer, comctl32 and uxtheme the state of
themes in reactos was improved a lot. I would like to ask your opinions
about enabling themes in 3rd stage. It is also possible to have an option
in 2nd stage to select if we want 3rd stage to have themes enabled. Do you
think this should be enabled by default or not? All ideas are welcome. My
intention is to complete it ASAP so that it can make in the release.
>
> Thanks,
> Giannis Adamopoulos
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
So you volunteer to create a theme?
Hermès BÉLUSCA-MAÏTO <hermes.belusca(a)sfr.fr> wrote on Mon, July 31st, 2017, 6:24 PM:
> What about the « Whistler » - like theme ? ^^
>
>
>
> H.
>
>
>
> De : Ros-dev [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] De la part de Mark Jansen
> Envoyé : lundi 31 juillet 2017 17:18
> À : ReactOS Development List
> Objet : Re: [ros-dev] Enabling themes in 3rd stage
>
>
>
> I like this theme!
>
>
>
> Op 31 jul. 2017 16:44 schreef "Ged Murphy" <gedmurphy.maillists(a)gmail.com>:
>
> A link to the theme I mentioned would probably help...
> http://aportz19.deviantart.com/art/Basic-Lite-and-Basic-8-Visual-Style-for-…
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ged Murphy [mailto:gedmurphy.maillists@gmail.com]
> Sent: 31 July 2017 15:43
> To: 'ReactOS Development List' <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
> Subject: RE: [ros-dev] Enabling themes in 3rd stage
>
> Do you have some pics??
>
> I've always been a big fan of seeing the Basic Lite theme being on by default, which would give ros a much more modern look and feel.
> We're missing the start menu implementation for this though.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ros-dev [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] On Behalf Of Giannis Adamopoulos
> Sent: 31 July 2017 15:29
> To: ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> Subject: [ros-dev] Enabling themes in 3rd stage
>
> Hello,
> After recent changes in explorer, comctl32 and uxtheme the state of themes in reactos was improved a lot. I would like to ask your opinions about enabling themes in 3rd stage. It is also possible to have an option in 2nd stage to select if we want 3rd stage to have themes enabled. Do you think this should be enabled by default or not? All ideas are welcome. My intention is to complete it ASAP so that it can make in the release.
>
> Thanks,
> Giannis Adamopoulos
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
hi all,
honestly, i dont think theming is a crucial choose when installing. i would
not add that screen, at 2nd stage at least.
Maybe at 3rd, right after 1st run....
El 31/07/2017 18:28, "Hermès BÉLUSCA-MAÏTO" <hermes.belusca(a)sfr.fr>
escribió:
What about the « Whistler » - like theme ? ^^
H.
*De :* Ros-dev [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] *De la part de* Mark
Jansen
*Envoyé :* lundi 31 juillet 2017 17:18
*À :* ReactOS Development List
*Objet :* Re: [ros-dev] Enabling themes in 3rd stage
I like this theme!
Op 31 jul. 2017 16:44 schreef "Ged Murphy" <gedmurphy.maillists(a)gmail.com>:
A link to the theme I mentioned would probably help...
http://aportz19.deviantart.com/art/Basic-Lite-and-Basic-
8-Visual-Style-for-Windows-XP-393826050
-----Original Message-----
From: Ged Murphy [mailto:gedmurphy.maillists@gmail.com]
Sent: 31 July 2017 15:43
To: 'ReactOS Development List' <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
Subject: RE: [ros-dev] Enabling themes in 3rd stage
Do you have some pics??
I've always been a big fan of seeing the Basic Lite theme being on by
default, which would give ros a much more modern look and feel.
We're missing the start menu implementation for this though.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ros-dev [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] On Behalf Of Giannis
Adamopoulos
Sent: 31 July 2017 15:29
To: ros-dev(a)reactos.org
Subject: [ros-dev] Enabling themes in 3rd stage
Hello,
After recent changes in explorer, comctl32 and uxtheme the state of themes
in reactos was improved a lot. I would like to ask your opinions about
enabling themes in 3rd stage. It is also possible to have an option in 2nd
stage to select if we want 3rd stage to have themes enabled. Do you think
this should be enabled by default or not? All ideas are welcome. My
intention is to complete it ASAP so that it can make in the release.
Thanks,
Giannis Adamopoulos
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Lautus: http://i.imgur.com/lqrqvtu.png
Basic lite (without any font changes): http://i.imgur.com/BcTIF9m.png
To make basic lite look better needs to substitute its fonts with some we already have.
Ged Murphy <gedmurphy.maillists(a)gmail.com> wrote on Mon, July 31st, 2017, 4:44 PM:
> A link to the theme I mentioned would probably help...
> http://aportz19.deviantart.com/art/Basic-Lite-and-Basic-8-Visual-Style-for-…
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ged Murphy [mailto:gedmurphy.maillists@gmail.com]
> Sent: 31 July 2017 15:43
> To: 'ReactOS Development List' <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
> Subject: RE: [ros-dev] Enabling themes in 3rd stage
>
> Do you have some pics??
>
> I've always been a big fan of seeing the Basic Lite theme being on by default, which would give ros a much more modern look and feel.
> We're missing the start menu implementation for this though.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ros-dev [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] On Behalf Of Giannis Adamopoulos
> Sent: 31 July 2017 15:29
> To: ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> Subject: [ros-dev] Enabling themes in 3rd stage
>
> Hello,
> After recent changes in explorer, comctl32 and uxtheme the state of themes in reactos was improved a lot. I would like to ask your opinions about enabling themes in 3rd stage. It is also possible to have an option in 2nd stage to select if we want 3rd stage to have themes enabled. Do you think this should be enabled by default or not? All ideas are welcome. My intention is to complete it ASAP so that it can make in the release.
>
> Thanks,
> Giannis Adamopoulos
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Hi all!
With the Hackfest less than 3 weeks away, let me give you another status
update:
* It is important that you now add yourself to
https://reactos.org/wiki/ReactOS_Hackfest_2017/Lists or fix up your
information there.
Further E-Mails will only go to the people listed there.
* As many of us also attend FrOSCon on Saturday and Sunday (19-20), I'm
also going to book the loft for this night. There may be options closer
to FrOSCon, but I think not having to hastily check out early on
Saturday with the entire equipment outweighs the 1 hour trip between the
loft and FrOSCon.
* The Ideas list looks very promising. In order to make the most out of
the Hackfest, preparations should begin now. For example, I really want
the Git move to happen in October, so let's not hesitate with all
necessary source tree restructuring and testing.
There has been no meeting announced for tomorrow, so I'm unsure whether
we will have one. In case we do, let's handle any outstanding questions
tomorrow.
Cheers,
Colin
Hello, I am sanchaez (Alexander Shaposhnikov) - a GSoC student working on
RAPPS. I've found a set of useful wrappers for ATL on Github -
https://github.com/Amebis/atlex.
I have some questions:
1. It is GPLv3. Is it compatible with ROS license? Can I use them?
2. If I can, where to place it in the source folders?
P.S. I've rushed a little by committing it to my branch. "It lies in
reactos\sdk\include\reactos" for now.
Thanks in advance,
Alexander
Ethereum is a decentralised cryptocurrency based on proof of work and
proof of stake consensus with Turing-complete scripting. Utilising
Ethereum for fundraiser will allow us to remove the middlemen from
raising funds and allow us to distribute them more directly. I want to
be first contract programmer for ReactOS ethereum account. Any kind of
release schemes may be developed. However, this will need detailed
discussion and official approval first.
Yours, faithfully
Erkin Alp
