- Ros-dev - ReactOS.org

Re: [ros-svn] [hbirr] 20793: - We cannot access the OwnerTable without locking the resource.
by Hartmut Birr 12 Jan '06

12 Jan '06

hbirr(a)svn.reactos.org wrote: > - We cannot access the OwnerTable without locking the resource. > - The shared waiters may wait also on the semaphore. It makes no sense to boost a waiting thread. > - The thread header is initialized like KeWaitForSingleObject (?, ?, ?, TRUE, ?). During the boost, > possible the dispatcher lock is released but the thread block (WaitNext) isn't changed. > > > > Updated files: > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ex/resource.c > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-svn mailing list > Ros-svn(a)reactos.org > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-svn > > Oops, I've copied the wrong commit message. The correct is: - We cannot access the OnerTable without locking the resource. - The shared waiters may wait also on the semaphore. It makes no sence to boost a waiting thread. - The thread header is initialized like KeWaitForSingleObject (?, ?, ?, TRUE, ?). During the boost, possible the dispatcher lock is released but the thread block (WaitNext) isn't changed. - Hartmut

1 1

Bug Check in Marea.c
by James Tabor 12 Jan '06

12 Jan '06

Hi all, With real hardware and revision 20802, At the end of first stage and after hitting the Finish button, I can reproduce this every time too, KeBugCheck at ./ntoskrnl/mm/marea.c:901 A problem has been detected and ReactOS has been shut down to prevent damage to your computer. Technical information: *** STOP: 0x00000000 (0x00000000,0x00000000,0x00000000,0x00000000) Frames: <ntoskrnl.exe:1676 (./ntoskrnl/ke/bug.c:483 (KeBugCheckEx))> <ntoskrnl.exe:168d (./ntoskrnl/ke/bug.c:504 (KeBugCheck))> <ntoskrnl.exe:4342b (./ntoskrnl/mm/marea.c:0 ())> <ntoskrnl.exe:434c4 (./ntoskrnl/mm/process.c:0 ())> <ntoskrnl.exe:55c12 (./ntoskrnl/ps/kill.c:200 (PspDeleteThread))> <ntoskrnl.exe:50cdd (./ntoskrnl/ob/object.c:0 ())> <ntoskrnl.exe:518ce (./ntoskrnl/ob/handle.c:254 (ObpDeleteHandle))> <ntoskrnl.exe:51a0b (./ntoskrnl/ob/handle.c:1112 (NtClose))> <ntoskrnl.exe:6440c (ntoskrnl/ke/i386/syscall.S:372 (KiSystemService))> <KERNEL32.dll:a697 (./lib/kernel32/misc/handle.c:0 ())> Entered debugger on embedded INT3 at 0x0008:0x80073b86. kdb:> bt Eip: <ntoskrnl.exe:73b87 (lib/rtl/i386/debug_asm.S:28 (DbgBreakPointWithStatus))> Frames: <ntoskrnl.exe:1676 (./ntoskrnl/ke/bug.c:483 (KeBugCheckEx))> <ntoskrnl.exe:168d (./ntoskrnl/ke/bug.c:504 (KeBugCheck))> <ntoskrnl.exe:4342b (./ntoskrnl/mm/marea.c:0 ())> <ntoskrnl.exe:434c4 (./ntoskrnl/mm/process.c:0 ())> <ntoskrnl.exe:55c12 (./ntoskrnl/ps/kill.c:200 (PspDeleteThread))> <ntoskrnl.exe:50cdd (./ntoskrnl/ob/object.c:0 ())> <ntoskrnl.exe:518ce (./ntoskrnl/ob/handle.c:254 (ObpDeleteHandle))> <ntoskrnl.exe:51a0b (./ntoskrnl/ob/handle.c:1112 (NtClose))> <ntoskrnl.exe:6440c (ntoskrnl/ke/i386/syscall.S:372 (KiSystemService))> <KERNEL32.dll:a697 (./lib/kernel32/misc/handle.c:0 ())> <winlogon.exe:1ae2> <winlogon.exe:20f6> <winlogon.exe:339a> <winlogon.exe:11e7> <winlogon.exe:1258> <00000000> kdb:> I go into ntoskrnl/mm/marea.c and at line 891 I change DPRINT to DPRINT1, now the system reboots and runs normal. I even have Abiword running with Winefile. Thanks, James

1 1

Re: [ros-diffs] [hbirr] 20793: - We cannot access the OwnerTable without locking the resource.
by Alex Ionescu 12 Jan '06

12 Jan '06

hbirr(a)svn.reactos.org wrote: > if (!Resource->ActiveCount) > { > > >- /* Nobody owns it, so let's take control */ > > >+ if (Resource->NumberOfSharedWaiters == 0) >+ { >+ Owner = &Resource->OwnerThreads[1]; >+ } >+ else >+ { >+ /* Find a free entry */ >+ Owner = ExpFindFreeEntry(Resource, &OldIrql); >+ if (!Owner) goto TryAcquire; >+ } >+ >+ Owner->OwnerThread = Thread; >+ Owner->OwnerCount = 1; > > > Resource->ActiveCount = 1; > > >- Resource->OwnerThreads[1].OwnerThread = Thread; >- Resource->OwnerThreads[1].OwnerCount = 1; > > > > /* Release the lock and return */ > ExReleaseResourceLock(&Resource->SpinLock, OldIrql); > > This change makes no sense. Note that we check for !Resource->ActiveCount. This, by definition implies that there CANNOT be any exclusive owner or shared owner. Access to the resource should be granted instanteously. Best regards, Alex Ionescu

1 0

RE: [ros-dev] Patent on FAT
by Murphy, Ged (Bolton) 11 Jan '06

11 Jan '06

Ge van Geldorp wrote: > AFAIK, it is about storing both a long and a short filename > for the same > file in the same directory. > > GvG Do we really need the ability to store short file names? Can we not just remove that feature entirely? Ged. ************************************************************************ The information contained in this message or any of its attachments is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. The views expressed may not be company policy, but the personal views of the originator. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact postmaster(a)exideuk.co.uk <mailto:postmaster@exideuk.co.uk> and then delete this message. Exide Technologies is an industrial and transportation battery producer and recycler with operations in 89 countries. Further information can be found at www.exide.com

12 14

Re: Re: [ros-dev] Patent on FAT
by Johannes Olofsson 11 Jan '06

11 Jan '06

Does it really matter if people enable it or not if we still provide the functionality? /Johannes Olofsson > Till: ReactOS Development List <ros-dev(a)reactos.org> > Rubrik: Re: [ros-dev] Patent on FAT > Datum: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:57:50 -0500 > Hi, > > I think we should turn off the 8.3 short filename support by default > and see what breaks. Providing a option right at the start of 2nd > stage step "Patented features" using a checkbox to enable it should > get us around the issue. Its not our problem if someone else enables > it. > > -- > Steven Edwards - ReactOS and Wine developer > > "There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world, and > that is an idea whose time has come." - Victor Hugo > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > Ros-dev(a)reactos.org > <a > href=http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev>http://www.reactos.org/ > mailman/listinfo/ros-dev</a>

2 1

RE: [ros-dev] Patent on FAT
by Murphy, Ged (Bolton) 11 Jan '06

11 Jan '06

nitro2k01 wrote: > I haven't seen the patant documents, but doesn't this mean that any > file system which stores both long and short file names on the same > volume would be theoreticlly affected? > No. Long files names were incorporated into unix systems long before the days FAT, or even DOS. This patent (if correct) is linked to FAT only. If is true, it would effect many things, but I can't see Microsoft enforcing it, it would alienate themselves. Just the fact that it is there is a problem for ReactOS though, even if they don't do anything about it. I haven't been able to find a copy of the patent yet. AFAIK, it was only released today. Ged. ************************************************************************ The information contained in this message or any of its attachments is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. The views expressed may not be company policy, but the personal views of the originator. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact postmaster(a)exideuk.co.uk <mailto:postmaster@exideuk.co.uk> and then delete this message. Exide Technologies is an industrial and transportation battery producer and recycler with operations in 89 countries. Further information can be found at www.exide.com

6 5

Could someone look at bug 1263?? Please?
by WaxDragon 11 Jan '06

11 Jan '06

I've seen this bugcheck several times debugging various things. At the moment, it reproducible following the steps in the bug. This has been around for a while and it aid me greatly to have it fixed. http://www.reactos.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1263 WD -- <Alex_Ionescu> it's like saying let's rename Ke to Kernel because people think it's Ketchup

3 4

RE: [ros-dev] Patent on FAT
by Murphy, Ged (Bolton) 11 Jan '06

11 Jan '06

Murphy, Ged (Bolton) wrote: > > I'm reading reports of a US patent on FAT. > Link: http://news.com.com/Microsofts+file+system+patent+upheld/2100-1012_3-6025447 .html?part=rss&tag=6025447&subj=news ************************************************************************ The information contained in this message or any of its attachments is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. The views expressed may not be company policy, but the personal views of the originator. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact postmaster(a)exideuk.co.uk <mailto:postmaster@exideuk.co.uk> and then delete this message. Exide Technologies is an industrial and transportation battery producer and recycler with operations in 89 countries. Further information can be found at www.exide.com

1 0

Re: [ros-diffs] [gedmurphy] 20773: - popup menu on right click
by Thomas Weidenmueller 10 Jan '06

10 Jan '06

gedmurphy(a)svn.reactos.org wrote: > + case NM_RCLICK: you should use WM_CONTEXTMENU instead so the menus are also accessible by using the keyboard. - Thomas

1 0

Dev blogs
by Murphy, Ged (Bolton) 10 Jan '06

10 Jan '06

I'd quite like to see the blog page integrated into the site and made to look pretty. I also think it might entice devs to start using the thing. At the moment there is only about 4 people listed, and of those only Alex every actually uses it. Would developers make an effort to start blogging if it was 'spruced up' and integrated? If not, I think it should be removed as it looks a bit pitiful as it is and gives the impression not much is going on (which is obviously not the case) It doesn't always have to be development related stuff in there. Anything interesting draws a crowd. Ged. ************************************************************************ The information contained in this message or any of its attachments is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. The views expressed may not be company policy, but the personal views of the originator. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact postmaster(a)exideuk.co.uk <mailto:postmaster@exideuk.co.uk> and then delete this message. Exide Technologies is an industrial and transportation battery producer and recycler with operations in 89 countries. Further information can be found at www.exide.com

5 5

Re: [ros-bugs] [Bug 1264] Use of pentium-class instructions
by Jerry 10 Jan '06

10 Jan '06

I would have to agree with this. ReactOS.Bugzilla(a)reactos.org wrote: >http://www.reactos.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1264 > > > > > >------- Additional Comments From gvg(a)reactos.org 2006-01-10 19:07 CET ------- >I'd prefer something along the lines of: > >FooBarFast: > non-486 implementation > >FooBar486: > 486 implementation > >FooBarInit: > Store either FooBarFast or FooBar486 in FooBarPtr > >FooBarPtr: > .long FooBarInit > > .global ExfFooBar >ExfFooBar: > jmp [FooBarPtr] > >No self modifying code, at the expense of an indirect jump > > >

1 0

Strategy for invalid parameters
by M Bealby 10 Jan '06

10 Jan '06

I was just taking a look at some ReactOS code this evening and it got me thinking about what our general strategy for handling invalid parameters is. For example, in kernel32.dll there is a function DebugBreakProcess. This function takes one parameter, a process handle. This parameter is passed through the following list of functions unchecked by any of them, until the final one will return a failure... DebugBreakProcess DbgUiIssueRemoteBreakIn RtlCreateUserThread RtlpCreateUserStack ZwAllocateVirtualMemory ObReferenceObjectByHandle Now I know this isn't a security vulnerability, which is what I was originally looking for, but it did make me think of the question of where should bounds checking be added? In this example, the process handle must be a value greater than zero. Should this simple check be added to DebugBreakProcess, or all of the above? Is there some sort of standard that everyone should work to? e.g. should all functions check their own parameters. Sure it might make it a little slower due to multiple checks but it would make ReactOS very robust. Any thoughts on this? Martin PS: Lack of activity recently had been due to uni. exams.

3 3

Re: [ros-diffs] [hbirr] 20759: - Fixed KiExitDispatcher.
by Alex Ionescu 10 Jan '06

10 Jan '06

hbirr(a)svn.reactos.org wrote: > >- Defined KeIpiGenericCall. It is necessary for the smp build. > Hi, It should be in the w32api DDK, not in the interal headers. Sorry for removing it if this broke the build, I didn't notice on UP. Best regards, Alex Ionescu

1 0

cmpxchg8b
by Ge van Geldorp 10 Jan '06

10 Jan '06

It seems the old binutils versions don't have a problem with "cmpxchg8b" but with "qword ptr". The patch below makes the code compile on older versions again. Any objections to committing it? I've created a bug 1264 for keeping track of the "no longer works on i486" issue. GvG Index: ntoskrnl/ex/i386/fastinterlck_asm.S =================================================================== --- ntoskrnl/ex/i386/fastinterlck_asm.S (revision 20747) +++ ntoskrnl/ex/i386/fastinterlck_asm.S (working copy) @@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ /* Get next pointer and do the exchange */ mov ebx, [eax] - LOCK cmpxchg8b qword ptr [ebp] + LOCK cmpxchg8b [ebp] jnz 1b /* Restore registers and return */ @@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ lea ecx, [edx+0x10001] /* Do the exchange */ - LOCK cmpxchg8b qword ptr [ebp] + LOCK cmpxchg8b [ebp] jnz 1b /* Restore registers and return */ @@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ mov cx, bx /* Do the exchange */ - LOCK cmpxchg8b qword ptr [ebp] + LOCK cmpxchg8b [ebp] jnz 1b /* Restore registers and return */ @@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ mov edx, [edx+4] /* Do the op */ - LOCK cmpxchg8b qword ptr [ebp] + LOCK cmpxchg8b [ebp] /* Restore volatiles */ pop ebp @@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ mov edx, [edx+4] /* Do the op */ - LOCK cmpxchg8b qword ptr [ebp] + LOCK cmpxchg8b [ebp] /* Restore volatiles */ pop ebp

2 1

Re: [ros-svn] [ion] 20554: - Fix shamefully dangerously broken Work Thread/Queue/Item implementation:
by Hartmut Birr 09 Jan '06

09 Jan '06

ion(a)svn.reactos.org wrote: > - Fix shamefully dangerously broken Work Thread/Queue/Item implementation: > * Do not pollute the kernel with 10 real-time threads and 5 high-priority threads in order to manage work items. Work threads are very-low priority (< 7) and should never pre-empt userthreads like they do now. 1 priority 7, 5 priority 5 and 3 priority 4 threads are now properly created. > * Implement a worker thread balance set manager. On SMP systems, it is able to determine when a new thread should be allocate to execute on a free CPU. On both UP and MP, it is also able to detect if a work queue has deadlocked, and will allocate new dynamic threads to unfreeze the queue. > * Add check for threads returning with APC disabled, and re-enable APCs if this happend. This hack is used in NT for broken drivers. > * Lots of code changes to support dynamic threads, which: > - Can terminate. > - Use a 10 minute timeout on the kernel queue. > * Add skeleton code for swapping worker thread stacks as well as worker thread shutdown (not yet implemented). > * Add WORKER_INVALID bugcheck definition. > * These changes seem to make ROS a lot more responsive. > > - NDK: > * Make more compatible with MS IFS > * Fix EX_WORK_QUEUE definition. > * Fix ETHREAD offsets. > * Fix RtlIsNameLegalDOS8Dot3 definition. > * Move splay tree defines to IFS. > > > Updated files: > trunk/reactos/include/ndk/exfuncs.h > trunk/reactos/include/ndk/extypes.h > trunk/reactos/include/ndk/ifssupp.h > trunk/reactos/include/ndk/iofuncs.h > trunk/reactos/include/ndk/obfuncs.h > trunk/reactos/include/ndk/pstypes.h > trunk/reactos/include/ndk/rtlfuncs.h > trunk/reactos/include/ndk/rtltypes.h > trunk/reactos/lib/rtl/dos8dot3.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ex/work.c > trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/ntoskrnl.mc > trunk/reactos/w32api/include/ddk/ntifs.h > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-svn mailing list > Ros-svn(a)reactos.org > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-svn > > After applying this commit, I get a crash during compiling ros on ros with 'make clean' on a clean tree on my smp machine: Assertion (Thread->State == Waiting) == (Thread->WaitBlockList != NULL) failed at ./ntoskrnl/ke/wait.c:722 I don't get a back trace. It may be a problem of the broken ASSERT statement (DBG=1 and KDBG=0). - Hartmut

6 19

Wininet
by Robert Shearman 09 Jan '06

09 Jan '06

Why is the ReactOS version of wininet out of sync with Wine? There have been a ton of fixes going into Wine in recent months that unfortunately ReactOS is missing out on. -- Rob Shearman

2 2

[ros-dev] Re: 20707: - userinit, usetup, vmwinst, welcome, winefile, winlogon, winver.
by Martin Fuchs 08 Jan '06

08 Jan '06

On 08.01.2006 11:23:52 ion(a)svn.reactos.org wrote: > - userinit, usetup, vmwinst, welcome, winefile, winlogon, winver. > Updated files: ... > trunk/reactos/subsys/system/winefile/winefile.c May I ask what this changes should be for? Adding "__cdecl" attributes doesn't make much sense for me. And winefile compiles without problems on MSVC since ages. Regards, Martin

1 0

Re: [ros-diffs] [cwittich] 20720: fix building with MSVC
by Thomas Weidenmueller 08 Jan '06

08 Jan '06

cwittich(a)svn.reactos.org wrote: > - GetFileTitle(szFileName, Globals.szFileTitle, sizeof(Globals.szFileTitle)); > > + GetFileTitle(szFileName, Globals.szFileTitle, wcslen(Globals.szFileTitle)); This change is wrong, sizeof(Globals.szFileTitle) is correct. The last parameter is the size of the buffer the second parameter represents. - Thomas

1 1

Re: [ros-diffs] [greatlrd] 20713: fix cmd build with MSVC 2005
by Thomas Weidenmueller 08 Jan '06

08 Jan '06

greatlrd(a)svn.reactos.org wrote: > fix cmd build with MSVC 2005 > > Modified: trunk/reactos/subsys/system/cmd/precomp.h > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *Modified: trunk/reactos/subsys/system/cmd/precomp.h* > > --- trunk/reactos/subsys/system/cmd/precomp.h 2006-01-08 13:54:06 UTC (rev 20712) > +++ trunk/reactos/subsys/system/cmd/precomp.h 2006-01-08 15:22:56 UTC (rev 20713) > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ > > #ifdef _MSC_VER > #pragma warning ( disable : 4103 ) /* use #pragma pack to change alignment */ > > +#undef _CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE > > #define _CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE > #endif//_MSC_VER > > why not: #ifndef _CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE #define _CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE #endif - Thomas

1 0

Re: [ros-diffs] [cwittich] 20719: fixed some bugs
by Thomas Weidenmueller 08 Jan '06

08 Jan '06

cwittich(a)svn.reactos.org wrote: > + Data = (TCHAR*) HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), 0, MAX_VALUE_NAME); It should be MAX_VALUE_NAME * sizeof(TCHAR) - Thomas

1 0

RE: [ros-dev] Optimization Proposal
by Murphy, Ged (Bolton) 08 Jan '06

08 Jan '06

Royce Mitchell III wrote > How are you source-level debugging ros? Probably using Insight, that's what I use when building with mingw. I don't know assembly well enough to even consider it. Ged. ************************************************************************ The information contained in this message or any of its attachments is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. The views expressed may not be company policy, but the personal views of the originator. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact postmaster(a)exideuk.co.uk <mailto:postmaster@exideuk.co.uk> and then delete this message. Exide Technologies is an industrial and transportation battery producer and recycler with operations in 89 countries. Further information can be found at www.exide.com

5 6

make: *** No rule to make target `drivers/net/npf/npf.xml', needed by `makefile.auto'. Stop.
by Reuben Perelman 07 Jan '06

07 Jan '06

I just got this error when trying to compile reactos: > reub2000@reub2000 ~/reactos $ svn up && make clean && make > At revision 20661. > [CC] tools/rbuild/backend/msvc/vcprojmaker.cpp > [CC] tools/rbuild/module.cpp > [LD] output-i386/tools/rbuild/rbuild > [NCI] ntoskrnl/include/internal/napi.h > make: *** No rule to make target `drivers/net/npf/npf.xml', needed by > `makefile.auto'. Stop.

3 3

Re: [ros-diffs] [jimtabor] 20647: Patch by Raimonds Praude raimonds.praude at sets.lv
by Filip Navara 07 Jan '06

07 Jan '06

>+ case CB_LIMITTEXT: >+ if( lphc->wState & CBF_EDIT ) >+ return SendMessageW(lphc->hWndEdit, EM_LIMITTEXT, wParam, lParam); > > <- "break;" statement is missing here and the indentation is fscked up. - Filip

1 0

Re: [ros-svn] [ion] 20656: - Do not generate manifest files for drivers or native apps.
by James Tabor 07 Jan '06

07 Jan '06

Hi Alex, ion(a)svn.reactos.org wrote: > - Get portcls to compile. > trunk/reactos/drivers/multimedia/portcls/portcls.c > trunk/reactos/drivers/multimedia/portcls/portcls.h Was OSR wrong? Wow! 8^o Thanks, James

2 2

Re: [ros-svn] [ion] 20653: - Get chew and csq to compile.
by James Tabor 07 Jan '06

07 Jan '06

ion(a)svn.reactos.org wrote: > - Get chew and csq to compile. > > > Updated files: > trunk/reactos/drivers/lib/chew/workqueue.c > trunk/reactos/drivers/lib/csq/csq.c > Sorry Alex! darkstar:/home/ros/rosbackup# make depends make[1]: Entering directory `/home/ros/rosbackup' [RBUILD] makefile.auto Reading build files...done ExecuteInvocations Detecting compiler...detected (mingw32-gcc) Detecting binutils...detected (mingw32-ld) Detecting netwide assembler...detected (nasm) Detecting compiler -pipe support...detected Detecting compiler pre-compiled header support...detected Processing modules...done Creating directories...done Unpacking WINE resources...done Generating test support code...done Generating compilation unit support code...done Generating syssetup.inf...done Generating proxy makefiles...done Checking automatic dependencies...done make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ros/rosbackup' make[1]: Entering directory `/home/ros/rosbackup' [CC] drivers/lib/chew/workqueue.c drivers/lib/chew/workqueue.c:63: error: conflicting types for 'ChewCreate' include/chew/chew.h:34: error: previous declaration of 'ChewCreate' was here drivers/lib/chew/workqueue.c:63: error: conflicting types for 'ChewCreate' include/chew/chew.h:34: error: previous declaration of 'ChewCreate' was here make[1]: *** [obj-i386/drivers/lib/chew/workqueue.o] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ros/rosbackup' make: *** [depends] Error 2 Darn! B^( James

2 1

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Ros-dev