- Ros-dev - ReactOS.org

revision 14561 crash
by Saveliy Tretiakov 09 Apr '05

09 Apr '05

revision 14561 can't boot on vmware 4.5 debug output is attached

1 0

CommConfigDialog() and serialui.dll
by Saveliy Tretiakov 09 Apr '05

09 Apr '05

Hi all. This is my changes :) serialui - Started serialui dll - Implemented drvCommConfigDialogA and drvCommConfigDialogW kernel32.diff - Implemented CommConfigDialogA and CommConfigDialogW - Removed @unimplemented comments for some implemented functions include.diff - Add missing ioctls to ntddser.h: IOCTL_SERIAL_GET_COMMCONFIG and IOCTL_SERIAL_SET_COMMCONFIG btw. Screenshot is here: http://www.ljplus.ru/img2/drg4njubas/commdlg.JPG

4 11

Non-informational commit messages
by Mark Junker 09 Apr '05

09 Apr '05

Hi, it'd be nice if something like r14554: Delete riched20 r14555: Copy riched20 can be avoided in preference of the *cause* the required the changes above. Everybody can see that riched20 was deleted and added afterwards but you cannot see *why* this has been done. Regards, Mark

2 2

GDIPLUS.DLL implementation
by lists＠silverblade.co.uk 09 Apr '05

09 Apr '05

I'm not sure what the current state of ReactOS' GDIPLUS.DLL implementation is, and I know it's just a case of downloading the DLL from Microsoft for the functionality, but I've been recently looking into making a mini GUI API for a program I'm working on, and the author informed me someone is making a GDIPLUS.DLL clone, using Anti-Grain: www.antigrain.com I'm unsure what the URL was for the project as I'm not at home at the moment, but I figured if GDIPLUS.DLL needs some work in ReactOS, it would be a good starting point to use the one based on Anti-Grain, as apparently the one from MS is slower and has a few glitches (see the demos on the Anti-Grain site - specifically the one with the arrows pointing at the different blobs.) Just thought it might be worth a mention :) -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .

1 0

Re: [ros-dev] Non-informational commit messages
by Steven Edwards 09 Apr '05

09 Apr '05

--- Mark Junker <mjscod(a)gmx.de> wrote: > r14554: Delete riched20 > r14555: Copy riched20 > > can be avoided in preference of the *cause* the required the changes above. > > Everybody can see that riched20 was deleted and added afterwards but you > cannot see *why* this has been done. This was because it was a merge from the trunk and when importing Wine code on the trunk you have to delete the existing copy and import from the vendor branch. Please read http://reactos.com/wiki/index.php/Using_code_from_other_projects Thanks Steven __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site! http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/

2 1

Package Manager license
by Saveliy Tretiakov 09 Apr '05

09 Apr '05

I can't find any license statement in packmgr sources. Can authors add it into comments please?

2 1

Re: Ros-dev Digest, Vol 8, Issue 17
by Lucio Diaz 09 Apr '05

09 Apr '05

I can imagine the News: BIG CORPORATION SUES A GROUP OF COLLEGES FOR DEVELOPING A NEW WINDOWS. MICROSOFT THREATENS A LITTLE NON PROFIT PROYECT! MICROSOFT AGAINST LIBRE SOFTWARE! This has the chance to make microsoft more damage than you think they can do to ReactOS, unless they feel really threatened i doubt there will be any microsoft legal atack unless you use clearly microsoft code in the near or intermediate time. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:31:19 -0700 (PDT) > From: Steven Edwards <steven_ed4153(a)yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: [ros-dev] ReactOS Foundation 501c3 > Status - Approved > To: ReactOS Development List <ros-dev(a)reactos.com> > Message-ID: > <20050407203119.68427.qmail(a)web21121.mail.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Hi James, > > --- James Tabor > <jimtabor(a)adsl-64-217-116-74.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net> > wrote: > > Paying developers? Hum? > > > > I don't want to be the bad guy here, but this > could push people away from the project. It would > > be > > like going back to five years ago when ROS had no > GUI just a command console. Everyone will wait > > for five or so developers to fix things, and trust > me it does happen that way in the real world. > > The back log will kick their asses. > > See the other thread. I don't think paying > developers as full time workers is a good idea. I > think > Contracts or bounties on certain projects are. > > > Now I have to ask, where does the money come from? > If the ORG has no money, I guess it should > > produce a competing distribution CD. This could > make M$ happy, so M$ would have a target to > > sue at. Also everyone on the board would become a > target as well. > > I was wrong in the other email. I forgot we have $25 > in the general fund atm which was raised at > LinuxWorld. I expect we can make quite a bit selling > CDs, T-Shirts, Etc, if we want as well as > just accepting donations. As for the fear of > lawsuit, the idea behind the foundation was that it > was better the foundation get sued and try to have > some cash for legal defence rather than some > poor developer in school. Everybody here knows the > risk from Microsoft.... > > Thanks > Steven > ______________________________________________ Renovamos el Correo Yahoo!: ¡250 MB GRATIS! Nuevos servicios, más seguridad http://correo.yahoo.es

1 0

Fundation income
by Lucio Diaz 09 Apr '05

09 Apr '05

Someway i can not avoid thinking this looks like the milk jug tale, you have 0 income at the moment, and is much improbable you will get a stable income till the OS is quite more mature, so why worry with payings? If you get some money, probably not much at the moment, you could use for hardware upgrades in the server if needed, hosting and expo attendance (and in the last point i would encourage people to share resources as places to stay where the expo takes place if someone lives there, attendance of people near to that world area). I really doubt that 30$ bounty will atract new developers to implement a feature. Also i have to point you need a way to get that income, best from private donations, i sugest implementing two ways: - Send a check or paper money to a Fisical Mail Direction. - Using PayPal and credicards. -Direct bank transference. >From the three i would use the first :) ...i am quite paranoid with credit cards and the transference expenses would cost more than the transference. Best regards, Lucio Diaz. PD: If someday you want to make a ReactOS conference in a paradise island, e-mail me... ______________________________________________ Renovamos el Correo Yahoo!: ¡250 MB GRATIS! Nuevos servicios, más seguridad http://correo.yahoo.es

1 0

Re: [ros-dev] ReactOS Foundation 501c3 Status - Approved
by Steven Edwards 08 Apr '05

08 Apr '05

--- Jonathan Wilson <jonwil(a)tpgi.com.au> wrote: > The way to avoid being sued by microsoft (or at least sucessfully sued) is > not to violate microsoft Copyrights, Trademarks or Patents. (we have to be > especially carefull what with large chunks of windows out there in the form > of the leaked NT4 and 2000 source dumps) > And not to use any information obtained from microsoft under NDA. Try writting a hello world program in any sort of modern language and you might violate a patent. Thanks Steven __________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun. http://www.advision.webevents.yahoo.com/emoticontest

2 1

livecd + real hw = more crashing
by Royce Mitchell III 08 Apr '05

08 Apr '05

I don't see how this is even possible considering that IntCreateDevice sets various members of DriverObject... any ideas? Assertion DriverObject failed at io/irp.c:198 Frames: ntoskrnl: io/irp.c:200 IofCallDriver win32k: eng/device.c:62 EngDeviceIoControl framebuf.dll: surface.c:49 DrvEnableSurface win32k: objects/dc.c:663 IntCreatePrimarySurface win32k: ntuser/winsta.c:351 IntInitializeDesktopGraphics win32k: ntuser/guicheck.c:57 AddGuiApp win32k: ntuser/guicheck.c:92 IntGraphicsCheck win32k: objects/dc.c:748 IntGdiCreateDC win32k: ntuser/windc.c:135 DceAllocDCE win32k: ntuser/windc.c:494 NtUserGetDCEx win32k: ntuser/windc.c:115 NtUserGetDC ntoskrnl: KiSystemService user32: windows/dc.c:44 GetDC()

1 0

AOL Instant Messenger on ReactOS
by Nate DeSimone 08 Apr '05

08 Apr '05

Hi all, Just thought I would post a few screens. The installer for AIM runs up until the point that it actually copies files, at which point it gracefully crashes and exits. Probably not too much more work to get it working :-) . Regards, Nate DeSimone

1 0

Busted mingw-gcc 3.4.2
by Phillip Susi 07 Apr '05

07 Apr '05

I downloaded the mingw gcc 3.4.2 from mingw.org and it seems that it's specs/linker script is messed up. By default g++ should link to libstdc++.a shouldn't it? Well this thing isn't. Now I don't really understand how the gcc specs file works, but I think that is where it should be telling g++ to link to libstdc++.a, so if anyone else has any idea how that file works and might point out where I need to add the command to link in libstdc++.a, I'd appreciate it.

5 9

ReactOS Foundation 501c3 Status - Approved
by Steven Edwards 07 Apr '05

07 Apr '05

Hi, Just to let everyone know we are now approved to be a 501c3 org in the United States meaning that we can give a tax deduction for any contributions received for donations to the Foundation. I am in process of trying to get my paperwork together now to come up with a plan to move forward as I have never done this before and its been a learning process. Sorry its taken so damn long...... I would like to propose that we get something up rather quickly on foundation.reactos.org and review/amend the draft bylaws as needed as well as have our first real meeting after Jason and I have discussed off list drafting a new budget plan for the following expenses. Bounty System Retainer for Legal and Accounting Supplementation of Hosting Costs Administrative Assistant Reserve Fund Just to give you a idea I am wanting to budget whatever income we might have in the following way 80% developers/bounties 5% reserve fund (Mutual Funds, Savings, Etc) 5% legal reserve and retainer costs 5% supplement hosting and misc expenses (expos etc) 5% part-to-full time administrative assistant to help me manage paper work as I suck at it. Prior board meetings mainly consisted of me telephoning each board member upon the initial incorporation and we have not really moved forward since that time. Now that we are all nice and legal its time to hit the ground running. Currently our board of directors consists of long time developers to ReactOS and Wine Steven Edwards, Jason Filby, Alexandre Julliard, Brian Palmer and Rex Jolliff. I would like to get community feedback as part of our bylaw amending process on the current status of the board and when/if we should hold elections and restructure. Also from people that agreed to be on the board. Do you still want to do it? Does anyone else? Etc.... Thanks Steven __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Personals - Better first dates. More second dates. http://personals.yahoo.com

6 6

Re: [ros-dev] ReactOS Foundation 501c3 Status - Approved
by Steven Edwards 07 Apr '05

07 Apr '05

Hi, --- ea <ea(a)iol.it> wrote: > first of all, thank you for all the time you spent on the Foundation thing. > This is and has always been a big issue (or big fear?): how is this > handled on the Wine side? The only rational reason for a lawsuit is > Microsft suspects ROS has some stolen code in it that belongs to them > (see SCO versus Linux). We must therefore be sure our code is clean. > There could be some funds for paying a code analysis performed by a > third party (of course we can not ask a MS coder nor a ROS coder to look > at their code and at ours and say if they differ). Well so far one thing that has helped is the fact that there is no central authority that owns the code. Jason and I discussed this when we wanted to create the foundation and it was decided that if someone wants to turn code over to the foundation they can however in any case we will work to provide legal defence. Another thing Wine and ReactOS has going for them is the new Software Freedom law center http://www.softwarefreedom.org/. They are helping out with the Wine project so we get some level of protection from the amount of code we share with Wine. The real issue comes in on the kernel and driver side. I need to email them and discuss a working relationship with the foundation. That is soon on my todo list. Thanks Steven __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Make Yahoo! your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

1 0

Re: [ros-dev] ReactOS Foundation 501c3 Status - Approved
by Steven Edwards 07 Apr '05

07 Apr '05

Hi James, --- James Tabor <jimtabor(a)adsl-64-217-116-74.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net> wrote: > Paying developers? Hum? > > I don't want to be the bad guy here, but this could push people away from the project. It would > be > like going back to five years ago when ROS had no GUI just a command console. Everyone will wait > for five or so developers to fix things, and trust me it does happen that way in the real world. > The back log will kick their asses. See the other thread. I don't think paying developers as full time workers is a good idea. I think Contracts or bounties on certain projects are. > Now I have to ask, where does the money come from? If the ORG has no money, I guess it should > produce a competing distribution CD. This could make M$ happy, so M$ would have a target to > sue at. Also everyone on the board would become a target as well. I was wrong in the other email. I forgot we have $25 in the general fund atm which was raised at LinuxWorld. I expect we can make quite a bit selling CDs, T-Shirts, Etc, if we want as well as just accepting donations. As for the fear of lawsuit, the idea behind the foundation was that it was better the foundation get sued and try to have some cash for legal defence rather than some poor developer in school. Everybody here knows the risk from Microsoft.... Thanks Steven __________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger Show us what our next emoticon should look like. Join the fun. http://www.advision.webevents.yahoo.com/emoticontest

2 1

Re: [ros-dev] Re: [ros-foundation] ReactOS Foundation 501c3 Status - Approved
by Steven Edwards 07 Apr '05

07 Apr '05

--- Royce Mitchell III <royce3(a)ev1.net> wrote: > I think it's important to draw a clear line as to the responsibilities > of the board as opposed to things that should be decided by all > commiters ( vs things that the community at large should be invited into ). I agree. As far as I see it the board should just control the books and thats about it. > Basically there would be two types of bounties: > > 1) "Directed" bounties: If someone donates money towards the completion > of a purpose, the money must be made available for that purpose. > > 2) "General Funds" bounties: These are bounties created from the budget > above. The way I propose this should work is as follows: Anyone with > commit access can "propose" a bounty. The board would be responsible for > reviewing the bounty, and if it looks good to them ( possibly amending > it some ), they would submit it to the body of commiters for approval. > Obviously the board would be responsible for reigning in the bounties > from going over budget. Thats roughly the idea though you have put it in to much better words then I could have. > I would like to be involved in the by-law development process, or at > least be able to review them and give some feedback. I would be willing > to serve on the board, if I'm wanted. Join the foundation list and we can move forward with a real plan this time. Thanks Steven __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Personals - Better first dates. More second dates. http://personals.yahoo.com

1 0

Re: [ros-dev] ReactOS Foundation 501c3 Status - Approved
by Steven Edwards 07 Apr '05

07 Apr '05

--- Alex Ionescu <ionucu(a)videotron.ca> wrote: > Two issues I see here: > > 1) Developers. Do you mean that each developer will be paid? How will > this be done? equally shared? Not to sound like an ass, but there may be > times when a developer does absolutely nothing (read: me for the next > month), while someone else is hacking away 100KLOC of code. Or someone > that generally only does little fixes (which can be really useful, and > is all the useful time he can offer due to work/family/school) versus > someone which already has assured income and spends 24 hours a day > working on Reactos. Would it be fair to pay everyone the same amount of > money? Sorry if I'm misunderstanding the issue, but I just want to be > fair. Besides, I'm sure many developers might want to refuse getting > paid. Working for free is sometimes a personal choice, and the offers > certain tangible and psycoligcal advantages. I don't know about others, > but I myself would feel bad in many ways to receive money by working on > ReactOS. I would feel as if any bugs ormistakes that I make now have > monetary losses associated with them. The idea is to start with the ReactOS Foundation does two things in terms of paying developers. 1. Offers bounties for certain features or bugs in bugzilla. Call them 1 time cash prizes. 2. Acts as a escrow or broker for third parties wanting to offer a bounty. (see 1) I don't think this will discourage development. There are tons of little features I would like to see that no one is working on atm where a bounty system would be nice. If I had $500 spare I would put up a bounty for the 3com driver or for the NMake backend for the xmlbuildsystem. Also single user contributions could be pooled for a bug. NOTE: I DO NOT WANT A PLEDGE SYSTEM. THEY DON'T WORK. IF YOU REALLY WANT TO CONTRIBUTE MONEY TO A BUG THEN THIS WILL BE THE BEST WAY! Think about the following ------------------------------------------- Steven Edwards Enters bug #311337 "Make ReactOS have a 3com Vortext (959/930) driver" Alex gives $50 earmarked bug #311337 Steven gives $100 to bug #311337 Some random user throws in $200 for bug #311337 Someone decides "hey $350 will pay for a nice weekend at the beach! I'll take it!" And they start coding. They get a working driver and it passes QA so it goes in SVN. The ReactOS Foundation then writes a check for $350 to said developer. ------------------------------------------- > 2) I think expos should get more then 5%. An expo of 4 people would cost > around 2000$ (assuming 150$/night * 3 nights, plus food and other needs, > *4 people). Now at minimum we'll probably want to attend a North > American and a European conference, meaning 4000$. The European one is > bound to have more then 4 people anyways, so with 6 people, it'll up the > cost to 6000$. 5% means that we would need 80 000$ in donations. Seems a > lot to me at this stage. Then again, we probably won't want to pay the > full cost of an expo at this point, but whatever, I'm just giving ideas > and I hope they help! Nothing is set in stone as we have $0 cash flow atm. It will be up to the board to decide on a final budget. I just want to have a rough plan in place as I am going to start soliciting help for funding. > I would love to be on the board. I think I have some pretty good ideas > for moving forward, and it'll be a good short break from coding when > I'll happen. I want to get something up on foundation.reactos.org and then have a discussion on the ros-foundation list on what needs to be ammended in the bylaws and we can vote on restructure, memebers, etc. Thanks Steven __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Personals - Better first dates. More second dates. http://personals.yahoo.com

1 0

Help to tester : Build Ros on WIN98 PC
by Gge 07 Apr '05

07 Apr '05

Hi all, Buiding Reactos on a Win98 machine does noy work anymore ( at least for me) . It was working several ago. The make clean fails as well with these error messages : ----------------------------- netstat: [CLEAN] ping: [CLEAN] route: [CLEAN] telnet: [CLEAN] whois: [CLEAN] regtests: [CLEAN] tshared: [CLEAN] RM] /include/roscfg.h trop de paramètres - buildno.exe ==== Too many parameters fichier introuvable === File not found trop de paramètres - wine2ros.exe trop de paramètres - winebuild.exe trop de paramètres - bin2res.exe wpp: [CLEAN] unicode: [CLEAN] C:\Svn\reactos>mingw32-make -------------------------------- Anybody may confirm ? Thanks Gerard

4 5

Re: [ros-dev] Help to tester : Build Ros on WIN98 PC
by Sylvain Petreolle 06 Apr '05

06 Apr '05

Then this is a make.exe bug, which should use %COMSPEC%... --- Hartmut Birr <hartmut.birr(a)gmx.de> wrote: > The windows 98 problem has nothing to do with a bug in binutils. > Make.exe uses cmd to process all pipe commands on windows, but windows > 98 doesn't have a cmd program. You should copy command.com to cmd.com or > cmd.exe. > > - Hartmut Kind regards, Usurp (aka Sylvain Petreolle) humans are like computers, yesterday the BIOS was all - today its just a word

1 0

Bug Check Out of Memory!
by James Tabor 06 Apr '05

06 Apr '05

Hi! This was not unexpected. I noticed last night csrss was over 11000K bytes in size. The memory leak in csrss is handles, some of them do not close. So the number goes from ~80 to 2000+ after two days of building ros over and over. You can try to close the windows but the handle count is the same so~~~~~. Thanks, James (KERNEL32:mem/global.c:412) Memory Load: 59 (KERNEL32:mem/global.c:412) Memory Load: 59 (mm/npool.c:1626) Trying to allocate 16 bytes from nonpaged pool - nothing suita ble found, returning NULL KeBugCheck at mm/rmap.c:382 A problem has been detected and ReactOS has been shut down to prevent damage to your computer. The bug code is undefined. Please use an existing code instead. Technical information: *** STOP: 0x00000000 (0x00000000,0x00000000,0x00000000,0x00000000) Frames: <ntoskrnl.exe:dbe3 (ke/bug.c:459 (KeBugCheckEx))> <ntoskrnl.exe:dc03 (ke/bug.c:479 (KeBugCheck))> <ntoskrnl.exe:87911 (mm/rmap.c:382 (MmInsertRmap))> <ntoskrnl.exe:740aa (mm/anonmem.c:385 (MmNotPresentFaultVirtualMemory))> <ntoskrnl.exe:7e8f8 (mm/mm.c:387 (MmNotPresentFault))> <ntoskrnl.exe:befc (mm/i386/pfault.c:66 (MmPageFault))> <ntoskrnl.exe:1927 (ke/i386/exp.c:543 (KiTrapHandler))> <ntoskrnl.exe:399d (/tmp/ccc7YZmh.s:235 (KiTrapProlog))> <ntdll.dll:24118 (/tmp/ccuotceE.s:35 (memset))> Entered debugger on embedded INT3 at 0x0008:0x800064be. kdb:> Lock up no keyboard!

3 2

Re: [ros-svn] [royce] 14523: patch by kjk::hyperion, fix syntax of gcc inline asm
by Filip Navara 06 Apr '05

06 Apr '05

royce(a)svn.reactos.com wrote: >patch by kjk::hyperion, fix syntax of gcc inline asm > > >Updated files: >trunk/reactos/hal/halx86/include/hal.h > > This is not acceptable solution IMHO...there are problems with certain GCC versions assigning AMD64 registers on i386. See revision 13587 and http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10153. - Filip

2 1

livecd crash in serial.sys on real hw
by Royce Mitchell III 06 Apr '05

06 Apr '05

essentially, I've tracked down the problem to SerialPnpStartDevice() being called with ResourceList == NULL. Here's the details, if ya want 'em: serial.sys exception not handled stop 1e ( c0000005, 9d2f9019, 0, 0 ) serial.sys address 9d2f9019 base 9d2f6000 page fault 14(0) cs:eip 8:9d2f9019 <serial.sys: 3019> pnp.c:168 cr2 0 cr3 27000 proc: 8084ad00 Pid: 4 <System> Thrd: 8084b828 Tid: 0 DS,ES,GS=10 FS=30 eax 808a7660 ebx 0 ecx 808a7580 edx 808a7828 ebp 800bc9b4 esi 808a77b8 esp 800be808 edi 0 eflags 00210292 kesp 800be808 kernel stack base 800bd000 frames: <serial.sys: 352b> pnp.c:341, SerialPnP() calling SerialPnpStartDevice() <ntoskrnl.exe: 329c5> io/irp.c:212, IofCallDriver() calling indirect <ntoskrnl.exe: 329e1> io/irp.c:226, IoCallDriver() calling IofCallDriver() <ntoskrnl.exe: 34975> io/pnpmgr.c:665, IopInitiatePnpIrp() calling IoCallDriver() <ntoskrnl.exe: 2d151> io/device.c:78, IopInitializeDevice() calling IopInitiatePnpIrp() <ntoskrnl.exe: 2fa9d> io/driver.c:1890, NtLoadDriver() calling IopInitializeDevice() <ntoskrnl.exe: 318b> ke/i386/syscall.S:178 <ntoskrnl.exe: 2536d> ex/zw.S:771, ZwLoadDriver() <ntoskrnl.exe: 2efa1> io/driver.c:1378, IopInitializeSystemDrivers() calling IopLoadDriver() <8007cc61> ??? only possibility is: IoInit3() calling IopInitializeSystemDrivers() <8007d7ac> ??? only possibility is: ExpInitializeExecutive() calling IoInit3() <ntoskrnl.exe: d04c> ke/main.c:104, KiSystemStartup() calling ExpInitializeExecutive() <80079290> ke/main.c:283, _main() calling KiSystemStartup(); <ntoskrnl.exe: 104b> ke/i386/main.S:51 now, serial.sym: 13019: 8b 07 mov (%edi),%eax C:\cvs\reactos\drivers\dd\serial>addr2line -e serial.nostrip.sys 13019 C:/cvs/reactos/drivers/dd/serial/pnp.c:168 C:/cvs/reactos/drivers/dd/serial/pnp.c:168: for (i = 0; i < ResourceList->Count; i++) notice edi is NULL, which is holding the value of ResourceList, which traces it's origin back to: IoGetCurrentIrpStackLocation(Irp)->Parameters.StartDevice.AllocatedResources which in turn comes from: DeviceNode->BootResources at ntoskrnl/io/device.c:68 in IopInitializeDevice() there's a FIXME on the line above: /* FIXME: Should be DeviceNode->ResourceList */ hpoussin, or anybody else? should serial.sys handle a NULL ResourceList gracefully ( imho it should probably have some SEH in there ), or is it a bug for it to be getting a NULL ResourceList?

1 0

Re: [ros-dev] Invitation
by Steven Edwards 05 Apr '05

05 Apr '05

Hi, --- Robert K�pferl <rob(a)koepferl.de> wrote: > it might seem stupid or girlish, but I want to invite any of you to > visit me in Vienna (wien.AT) for a couple of days. I would like to just > see some of these people (and of course have freeky kernel talks) who > make up this project. Get to know personally. Don't be shy and have a > try with my private email. (possibly use gpg/x.509). > If you think this Vienna is too far away - maybe next year I live less > far away from you. Some of us will be meeting at WineConf at the end of the month. Thanks Steven __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Personals - Better first dates. More second dates. http://personals.yahoo.com

2 1

Re: [ros-svn] [hbirr] 14505: Initialize the maximum length of the device description to allocate more than map register.
by James Tabor 05 Apr '05

05 Apr '05

Hi! hbirr(a)svn.reactos.com wrote: > Initialize the maximum length of the device description to allocate more than map register. > > > > Updated files: > trunk/reactos/drivers/storage/floppy/floppy.c > Does this fix floppy support? I haven't had floppy working for 6+ months! ha! floppy working! James

2 1

Re: [ros-diffs] [hbirr] 14421: - Use IoBuildAsynchronousFsdRequest instead IoBuildSynchronousFsdRequest in NtRead/WriteFile.
by Gunnar Dalsnes 04 Apr '05

04 Apr '05

hbirr(a)svn.reactos.com wrote: > - Use IoBuildAsynchronousFsdRequest instead IoBuildSynchronousFsdRequest in NtRead/WriteFile. > - Guard the calls to IoBuildAsynchronousFsdRequest with an exception frame. > > Modified: trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/io/rw.c I dont understand these changes... Why did you change from sync. to asycn. version, and whats the point with try/except around IoBuildAsynchronousFsdRequest??? Gunnar

2 3

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Ros-dev