I obeservado that companies have made the opening of perfius on
social sites like orkte, face buk to have a closer contacts with its
customers
Suggestions
Taves Foce the time to develop a page-pink similar to orkut only for
pelomenos emvolvidos list of ros-dev communicate mellhor we take for
example the option orkut This allows you to replaying a message to the
entire group or just for some or open a profile but it would be the
maintainer of the profile to select some options
has some social networks that desacoselho to be very open but
partially open orkut and where he has partial control of where and
where does the information would be very nice to have something in
ros.org or maybe opening a profile on some these social networks
a method would be to discuss and APREDE programs in a more dynamic
A Matter discursoes saw some about the future of Roses
A sugentao as a powerful gaming machine MaxiVista server and at the
same time continue the development of financial markets and earn some
cash to the developers and everyone involved in the project we will
take as examples the maximum this game is notable that the projects do
not get for the day for the night
When complete the installation of the driver placa GF8200A shipeset
8200 Through the message that the dll not found Wow32.dll
MainFrameBase::OpenShellFolders():parent_pidl=C:\Documents and
Settgs\Administrator\Desktop
MainFrameBase::OpenShellFolders(): pidl_abs=(null)
(drivers\filesystems\cdfs\create.c:148) Status c0000013
(drivers\filesystems\cdfs\create.c:148) Status c0000013
(drivers\flesystems\cdfs\common.c:196) STATUS_VERIFY_REQUIRED
(drivers\filesystems\cdfs\fsctl.c:590) CDFS: IRP_MN_VERIFY_VOLUME
(drivers\filesystems\cdfs\fsctl.c:467) CdfsVerifyVolume() called
(drivers\filesystems\cdfs\fsctl.c:494) Deviceobject B1285A48 Device
to verify B1285A48
(drivers\filesystems\cdfs\devctrl.c:34) FIXME: CdfsDevieControl called
without FileObjec!
(drivers\filesystems\cdfs\fsct.c:511) Different volume!
(drives\filesystems\cdfs\fsctl.c:518) OenFile \ RefCount 1
(drivers\fiesystems\cdfs\fsctl.c:518) OpenFie \loader RefCount 0
(drivers\flesystems\cdfs\fsctl.c:518) OpenFile \reactos RefCount 0
(drivers\filesystems\cdfs\fsctl.c:518) OenFile \reactos\system32 RefCoun 0
(drivers\filesystems\cdfs\common.c203) IoVerifyVolume() returned
(Status c0000012)
(drivers\filesysems\cdfs\create.c:148) Status 8000016
MainFrameBase::OpenShellFolders():parent_pidl=(null)
MainFrameBase:OpenShellFolders(): pidl_abs=D:\
MDIMainFrame PM_OPEN_WINDOW: pat=D:\
MainFrameBase::OpenShellFolders():rent_pidl=D:\
(lib\rtl\path.c:256) don't keep the directory handl open on removable media
(dll\ntdll\ldr\utils.c:2301) Faile to create or open dll section
of'WOW32.DLL' (Status c0000135)
(d\ntdll\ldr\utils.c:1512) failed tload WOW32.DLL
(subsystems\win32csrss\csrsrv\api\wapi.c:115) CSR:received hard error c0000135
WARNING: MmLockPageableDataSectio at ntoskrnl\mm\ARM3\drvmgmt.c:62s
UNIMPLEMENTED!
WARNING: MmUnlockPageableImageSecon at ntoskrnl\mm\ARM3\drvmgmt.c: is
UNIMPLEMENTED!
(ntoskrnl\se\semgr.c:299) SidInTok Calls: 30000
2011/8/26, ros-dev-request(a)reactos.org <ros-dev-request(a)reactos.org>:
> Send Ros-dev mailing list submissions to
> ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> ros-dev-request(a)reactos.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> ros-dev-owner(a)reactos.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Ros-dev digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Debug Buildslave Maintenance (caemyr(a)myopera.com)
> 2. Re: Debug Buildslave Maintenance (Eric Kohl)
> 3. Re: [ros-diffs] [fireball] 53446: [NTDLL/LDR] - Fix wrong
> loop condition which would often lead to heap underread. - Fix
> wrong subkey string length calculation, which would result in an
> incorrect string being used... (Ged Murphy)
> 4. Re: [ros-diffs] [fireball] 53446: [NTDLL/LDR] - Fix wrong
> loop condition which would often lead to heap underread. - Fix
> wrong subkey string length calculation, which would result in an
> incorrect string being used... (Aleksey Bragin)
> 5. Re: Debug Buildslave Maintenance (Aleksey Bragin)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 23:29:55 +0200
> From: caemyr(a)myopera.com
> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Debug Buildslave Maintenance
> To: "ReactOS Development List" <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
> Message-ID:
> <1314307795.18690.140258133790149(a)webmail.messagingengine.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> @Eric
>
> http://reactos.org/testman/compare.php?ids=7429,7579
> http://reactos.org/testman/detail.php?id=2639952
>
> Please find that the crash is not CMake related, and CMake build is not
> inherently broken.
>
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 23:03 +0200, "Pierre Schweitzer"
> <pierre.schweitzer(a)reactos.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> finally.
>> Colin and I are pleased to announce you that ReactOS Linux KVM tests are
>> back online and working. You can find the first tests results (on r53383)
>> sent tonight by the testbot on testman: http://www.reactos.org/testman/.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Pierre.
>>
>> ReactOS Development List <ros-dev(a)reactos.org> wrote on Sat, August 20th,
>> 2011, 4:24 PM:
>> > Timo Kreuzer <timo.kreuzer(a)web.de> wrote:
>> > > What about fixing release buildbot first?
>> >
>> > It's still a private machine owned and administered solely by Christoph.
>> >
>> > As long as I can't even reach him by phone, we can only wait.
>> >
>> >
>> > > And is there a chance, maybe in the future, to switch buildbots more
>> > > easily, to have a backup solution running?
>> >
>> > First of all, we hope that we can get the same reliability as our other
>> > servers after reinstalling the server OS, giving more ReactOS admins
>> > access to the machine and adding monitoring.
>> > The current OS was meant to be reinstalled for quite a long time, but up
>> >
>> > to now, nobody with physical access to the machine had any time to do
>> > it.
>> >
>> > If such problems continue to exist afterwards, we can try to set up a
>> > fallback system, but this would require an equally configured and
>> > powerful Linux machine first.
>> >
>> >
>> > > One week without debug builds is a serious thing.
>> >
>> > I hope you're aware that builds are still properly uploaded, it's only
>> > the testing step which fails.
>> >
>> >
>> > - Colin
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Ros-dev mailing list
>> > Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>> > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>
> With best regards
> Caemyr
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 01:01:40 +0200
> From: Eric Kohl <eric.kohl(a)t-online.de>
> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Debug Buildslave Maintenance
> To: ReactOS Development List <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
> Message-ID: <4E56D454.6060606(a)t-online.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Hi Olaf,
>
> I am already investigating the services test issues. One of my first
> findings is that the current widl seems to mess up value ranges in some
> cases. This is the cause of the following errors:
> err:(dll/win32/rpcrt4/ndr_marshall.c:6496) value exceeded bounds: 918,
> low: 0, high: 514
>
> <rant>
> It is pretty annoying that jgardou updated rpcrt4, widl and other
> components without proper testing. At least he should have posted a bug
> list BEFORE he comitted the new stuff.
> </rant>
>
> Regards
> Eric
>
>> @Eric
>>
>> http://reactos.org/testman/compare.php?ids=7429,7579
>> http://reactos.org/testman/detail.php?id=2639952
>>
>> Please find that the crash is not CMake related, and CMake build is not
>> inherently broken.
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 09:05:21 +0100
> From: "Ged Murphy" <gedmurphy.maillists(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [fireball] 53446: [NTDLL/LDR] - Fix
> wrong loop condition which would often lead to heap underread. - Fix
> wrong subkey string length calculation, which would result in an
> incorrect string being used...
> To: <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
> Message-ID: <004201cc63c6$e7a44a40$b6ecdec0$(a)gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> fireball(a)svn.reactos.org wrote:
>
>> - Use Zw* functions instead of Nt* where necessary in
>> LdrQueryImageFileKeyOption().
>
> 'where necessary'm I don't understand this change.
> People prefer (and Microsoft recommend) that Nt* is used in usermode.
> Nt and Zw APIs point to the same address in usermode, so why is it
> necessary?
>
> Ged.
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:13:26 +0400
> From: Aleksey Bragin <aleksey(a)reactos.org>
> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [fireball] 53446: [NTDLL/LDR] - Fix
> wrong loop condition which would often lead to heap underread. - Fix
> wrong subkey string length calculation, which would result in an
> incorrect string being used...
> To: ReactOS Development List <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
> Message-ID: <7766A32C-3CB0-446A-96F4-4EDC73BC3A29(a)reactos.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
>
> On Aug 26, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Ged Murphy wrote:
>
>> fireball(a)svn.reactos.org wrote:
>>
>>> - Use Zw* functions instead of Nt* where necessary in
>>> LdrQueryImageFileKeyOption().
>>
>> 'where necessary'm I don't understand this change.
>> People prefer (and Microsoft recommend) that Nt* is used in usermode.
>> Nt and Zw APIs point to the same address in usermode, so why is it
>> necessary?
>
> This was a test for attention, and so far I got a few notices in IRC
> and one in ros-dev. Good!
>
> Seriously, the change slipped through because I was editing source
> code of both RTL (which works both at umode and kmode) and NTDLL/LDR
> (which is only umode) a while ago. Of course, Nt is "preferable" in
> usermode because there is just no reason to use Zw there.
>
>
> WBR,
> Aleksey Bragin.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:15:24 +0400
> From: Aleksey Bragin <aleksey(a)reactos.org>
> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Debug Buildslave Maintenance
> To: ReactOS Development List <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
> Message-ID: <1F3FEE77-59BC-4D24-83A9-5D280FB45966(a)reactos.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
>
> On Aug 26, 2011, at 3:01 AM, Eric Kohl wrote:
>
>> <rant>
>> It is pretty annoying that jgardou updated rpcrt4, widl and other
>> components without proper testing. At least he should have posted a
>> bug list BEFORE he comitted the new stuff.
>> </rant>
> I also ranted about that. In fact that's why I stopped syncing rpcrt4
> some time ago - because new version always gave problems. So I wanted
> to solve problems first and only then commit.
>
> But, OK, as Olaf said - if something needs to be done, let's simply
> do that and fix everything which broke ;).
>
> WBR,
> Aleksey.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
> End of Ros-dev Digest, Vol 84, Issue 22
> ***************************************
>
When complete the installation of the driver placa GF8200A shipeset
8200 Through the message that the dll not found Wow32.dll
2011/8/26, ros-dev-request(a)reactos.org <ros-dev-request(a)reactos.org>:
> Send Ros-dev mailing list submissions to
> ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> ros-dev-request(a)reactos.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> ros-dev-owner(a)reactos.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Ros-dev digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Debug Buildslave Maintenance (caemyr(a)myopera.com)
> 2. Re: Debug Buildslave Maintenance (Eric Kohl)
> 3. Re: [ros-diffs] [fireball] 53446: [NTDLL/LDR] - Fix wrong
> loop condition which would often lead to heap underread. - Fix
> wrong subkey string length calculation, which would result in an
> incorrect string being used... (Ged Murphy)
> 4. Re: [ros-diffs] [fireball] 53446: [NTDLL/LDR] - Fix wrong
> loop condition which would often lead to heap underread. - Fix
> wrong subkey string length calculation, which would result in an
> incorrect string being used... (Aleksey Bragin)
> 5. Re: Debug Buildslave Maintenance (Aleksey Bragin)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 23:29:55 +0200
> From: caemyr(a)myopera.com
> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Debug Buildslave Maintenance
> To: "ReactOS Development List" <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
> Message-ID:
> <1314307795.18690.140258133790149(a)webmail.messagingengine.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> @Eric
>
> http://reactos.org/testman/compare.php?ids=7429,7579
> http://reactos.org/testman/detail.php?id=2639952
>
> Please find that the crash is not CMake related, and CMake build is not
> inherently broken.
>
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 23:03 +0200, "Pierre Schweitzer"
> <pierre.schweitzer(a)reactos.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> finally.
>> Colin and I are pleased to announce you that ReactOS Linux KVM tests are
>> back online and working. You can find the first tests results (on r53383)
>> sent tonight by the testbot on testman: http://www.reactos.org/testman/.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Pierre.
>>
>> ReactOS Development List <ros-dev(a)reactos.org> wrote on Sat, August 20th,
>> 2011, 4:24 PM:
>> > Timo Kreuzer <timo.kreuzer(a)web.de> wrote:
>> > > What about fixing release buildbot first?
>> >
>> > It's still a private machine owned and administered solely by Christoph.
>> >
>> > As long as I can't even reach him by phone, we can only wait.
>> >
>> >
>> > > And is there a chance, maybe in the future, to switch buildbots more
>> > > easily, to have a backup solution running?
>> >
>> > First of all, we hope that we can get the same reliability as our other
>> > servers after reinstalling the server OS, giving more ReactOS admins
>> > access to the machine and adding monitoring.
>> > The current OS was meant to be reinstalled for quite a long time, but up
>> >
>> > to now, nobody with physical access to the machine had any time to do
>> > it.
>> >
>> > If such problems continue to exist afterwards, we can try to set up a
>> > fallback system, but this would require an equally configured and
>> > powerful Linux machine first.
>> >
>> >
>> > > One week without debug builds is a serious thing.
>> >
>> > I hope you're aware that builds are still properly uploaded, it's only
>> > the testing step which fails.
>> >
>> >
>> > - Colin
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Ros-dev mailing list
>> > Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>> > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>
> With best regards
> Caemyr
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 01:01:40 +0200
> From: Eric Kohl <eric.kohl(a)t-online.de>
> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Debug Buildslave Maintenance
> To: ReactOS Development List <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
> Message-ID: <4E56D454.6060606(a)t-online.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Hi Olaf,
>
> I am already investigating the services test issues. One of my first
> findings is that the current widl seems to mess up value ranges in some
> cases. This is the cause of the following errors:
> err:(dll/win32/rpcrt4/ndr_marshall.c:6496) value exceeded bounds: 918,
> low: 0, high: 514
>
> <rant>
> It is pretty annoying that jgardou updated rpcrt4, widl and other
> components without proper testing. At least he should have posted a bug
> list BEFORE he comitted the new stuff.
> </rant>
>
> Regards
> Eric
>
>> @Eric
>>
>> http://reactos.org/testman/compare.php?ids=7429,7579
>> http://reactos.org/testman/detail.php?id=2639952
>>
>> Please find that the crash is not CMake related, and CMake build is not
>> inherently broken.
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 09:05:21 +0100
> From: "Ged Murphy" <gedmurphy.maillists(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [fireball] 53446: [NTDLL/LDR] - Fix
> wrong loop condition which would often lead to heap underread. - Fix
> wrong subkey string length calculation, which would result in an
> incorrect string being used...
> To: <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
> Message-ID: <004201cc63c6$e7a44a40$b6ecdec0$(a)gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> fireball(a)svn.reactos.org wrote:
>
>> - Use Zw* functions instead of Nt* where necessary in
>> LdrQueryImageFileKeyOption().
>
> 'where necessary'm I don't understand this change.
> People prefer (and Microsoft recommend) that Nt* is used in usermode.
> Nt and Zw APIs point to the same address in usermode, so why is it
> necessary?
>
> Ged.
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:13:26 +0400
> From: Aleksey Bragin <aleksey(a)reactos.org>
> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [fireball] 53446: [NTDLL/LDR] - Fix
> wrong loop condition which would often lead to heap underread. - Fix
> wrong subkey string length calculation, which would result in an
> incorrect string being used...
> To: ReactOS Development List <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
> Message-ID: <7766A32C-3CB0-446A-96F4-4EDC73BC3A29(a)reactos.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
>
> On Aug 26, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Ged Murphy wrote:
>
>> fireball(a)svn.reactos.org wrote:
>>
>>> - Use Zw* functions instead of Nt* where necessary in
>>> LdrQueryImageFileKeyOption().
>>
>> 'where necessary'm I don't understand this change.
>> People prefer (and Microsoft recommend) that Nt* is used in usermode.
>> Nt and Zw APIs point to the same address in usermode, so why is it
>> necessary?
>
> This was a test for attention, and so far I got a few notices in IRC
> and one in ros-dev. Good!
>
> Seriously, the change slipped through because I was editing source
> code of both RTL (which works both at umode and kmode) and NTDLL/LDR
> (which is only umode) a while ago. Of course, Nt is "preferable" in
> usermode because there is just no reason to use Zw there.
>
>
> WBR,
> Aleksey Bragin.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:15:24 +0400
> From: Aleksey Bragin <aleksey(a)reactos.org>
> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Debug Buildslave Maintenance
> To: ReactOS Development List <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
> Message-ID: <1F3FEE77-59BC-4D24-83A9-5D280FB45966(a)reactos.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
>
>
> On Aug 26, 2011, at 3:01 AM, Eric Kohl wrote:
>
>> <rant>
>> It is pretty annoying that jgardou updated rpcrt4, widl and other
>> components without proper testing. At least he should have posted a
>> bug list BEFORE he comitted the new stuff.
>> </rant>
> I also ranted about that. In fact that's why I stopped syncing rpcrt4
> some time ago - because new version always gave problems. So I wanted
> to solve problems first and only then commit.
>
> But, OK, as Olaf said - if something needs to be done, let's simply
> do that and fix everything which broke ;).
>
> WBR,
> Aleksey.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
> End of Ros-dev Digest, Vol 84, Issue 22
> ***************************************
>
Hello all,
The Debug Buildslave will be down for maintenance throughout the next
week. We hope to have it fully working again by next weekend.
In the process of this maintenance, the OS will be reinstalled to match
the one we already use on our other servers. Besides, more of our
administrators will get access to the machine, so that further problems
can be debugged more easily.
- Colin
fireball(a)svn.reactos.org wrote:
> - Use Zw* functions instead of Nt* where necessary in LdrQueryImageFileKeyOption().
'where necessary'm I don't understand this change.
People prefer (and Microsoft recommend) that Nt* is used in usermode.
Nt and Zw APIs point to the same address in usermode, so why is it necessary?
Ged.
Hi,
this is a reminder about the Status meeting, which is to happen
tomorrow, 25th of August at 19:00 UTC. Please don't miss it.
Proposed agenda for the meeting:
1. Arwinss adoption voting.
2. CMake adoption voting.
3. Release preparation status report, deciding on the next release date.
4. Driver signing. Discussing possible threats and deciding on an
official position wrt driver signing in future.
4. Party related to GSoC results.
I propose to move individual devs status reports to ros-dev mailing
list, because there is no reason to just sit in the irc channel and
listen to them for hours.
List of participants:
- Giannis Adamopoulos (smiley1_)
- Johannes Anderwald (janderwald)
- Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo (elhoir)
- Maciej Bialas (niski)
- Jan Blomqvist-Kinander (JaixBly)
- Aleksey Bragin (abragin)
- Thomas Faber (ThFabba)
- Colin Finck (Colin_Finck)
- Jérôme Gardou (zefklop)
- Danny Götte (dangerground)
- Cameron Gutman (aicom)
- Ziliang Guo (ZWabbit)
- Rafal Harabien (rafalh)
- Andrew Hill (ash77)
- Kamil Hornicek (Pigglesworth)
- Gabriel Ilardi (gabriel_it)
- Alex Ionescu (Alex_Ionescu)
- Amine Khaldi (AmineKhaldi)
- Igor Koshpaev (tower)
- Timo Kreuzer (tkreuzer)
- Matthias Kupfer (Collibri)
- Michael Martin (mjmartin)
- Victor Martinez (vicmarcal)
- Roel Messiant (Mephisto)
- Claudiu Mihail (KlausM)
- Andrew Munger (WaxDragon)
- Ged Murphy (GedMurphy)
- Igor Paliychuk (igorko)
- Sylvain Petreolle (Usurp)
- Hervé Poussineau (hpoussin)
- Daniel Reimer (dreimer)
- Pierre Schweitzer (HeisSpiter)
- Samuel Serapion (encoded)
- Olaf Siejka (Caemyr)
- James Tabor (jimtabor)
- Christoph von Wittich (Christoph_vW)
- Art Yerkes (arty)
WBR,
Aleksey Bragin.
r53425 broke CMake build. To make the things worse, this is our only working test\iso provider at the moment. I would reckon fixing it a priority.
CMakeFiles/hal.dir/generic/halinit.c.obj: In function `HalInitSystem@8':
P:/Trunk_slave/x86_CMake/build/hal/halx86/generic/halinit.c:116: undefined reference to `HaliInitPnpDriver@0'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
--
With best regards
Caemyr
LwIP is in the final stage of testing, pending one bug fix before all known bugs are fixed. I would greatly appreciate everyone to try it and reply to this email with the results of your tests. I've already tried many apps including telnetd, chargen, and abyss web server, samba tng, and Opera 9.6. During my testing, the lwIP implementation performed flawlessly. It handled several chargen sessions while serving web pages and servicing open telnet sessions plus being probed by nmap. The only thing that finally killed the server was a pool leak that caused a win32k assert failure. I also ran a BitTorrent download and it peaked at 2.3 MB/s down. Web browsing is an absolute pleasure on lwIP. It really feels like I'm browsing on the host system directly. There are no more stutters like oskit had. I'd encourage everyone to try it. It's surprising how well it works especially since I thought oskit was fairly good. My testing on lwIP has been perfect and I hope everyone else has a similar experience. Please only report bugs that don't also happen with oskit. Happy testing!
LwIP ISO Link: http://www.mediafire.com/?d6j4qwz8vgabj9i
Thanks in advance,
Cameron
LinkedIn
------------
Eu gostaria de adicioná-lo à minha rede profissional no LinkedIn.
-dimas
dimas francisco
Profissional de Serviços da informação
São Paulo e redondezas, Brasil
Confirme que você conhece dimas francisco
https://www.linkedin.com/e/-w5xu2x-gre1loc3-34/isd/3867275872/u_LdDFjC/
--
(c) 2011, LinkedIn Corporation
And, you have, of course, confirmed that this piece of kernel code is wrong,
and that DevMgr/Cfgapi/SetupApi are doing the right thing, right?
So if I was to reverse engineer ntoskrnl I wouldn't discover that it was
actually doing the same thing as the un-"fixed" code, right?
Best regards,
Alex Ionescu
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 10:44 AM, <cgutman(a)svn.reactos.org> wrote:
> Author: cgutman
> Date: Sun Aug 14 14:44:34 2011
> New Revision: 53232
>
> URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=53232&view=rev
> Log:
> [NTOSKRNL]
> - Fix NULL termination of strings in IoGetDeviceProperty
> - Fixes garbage displayed in the Enumerator field of the device manager
> property page
>
> Modified:
> trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/io/pnpmgr/pnpmgr.c
>
> Modified: trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/io/pnpmgr/pnpmgr.c
> URL:
> http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/io/pnpmgr/pnpmgr.…
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/io/pnpmgr/pnpmgr.c [iso-8859-1] (original)
> +++ trunk/reactos/ntoskrnl/io/pnpmgr/pnpmgr.c [iso-8859-1] Sun Aug 14
> 14:44:34 2011
> @@ -3467,6 +3467,8 @@
> NTSTATUS Status = STATUS_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL;
> GUID BusTypeGuid;
> POBJECT_NAME_INFORMATION ObjectNameInfo = NULL;
> + BOOLEAN NullTerminate = FALSE;
> +
> DPRINT("IoGetDeviceProperty(0x%p %d)\n", DeviceObject, DeviceProperty);
>
> /* Assume failure */
> @@ -3517,7 +3519,10 @@
> /* Get the name from the path */
> EnumeratorNameEnd = wcschr(DeviceInstanceName,
> OBJ_NAME_PATH_SEPARATOR);
> ASSERT(EnumeratorNameEnd);
> -
> +
> + /* This string needs to be NULL-terminated */
> + NullTerminate = TRUE;
> +
> /* This is the format of the returned data */
> PIP_RETURN_DATA((EnumeratorNameEnd - DeviceInstanceName) *
> sizeof(WCHAR),
> DeviceInstanceName);
> @@ -3567,7 +3572,10 @@
> /* It's up to the caller to try again */
> Status = STATUS_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL;
> }
> -
> +
> + /* This string needs to be NULL-terminated */
> + NullTerminate = TRUE;
> +
> /* Return if successful */
> if (NT_SUCCESS(Status))
> PIP_RETURN_DATA(ObjectNameInfo->Name.Length,
>
> ObjectNameInfo->Name.Buffer);
> @@ -3633,15 +3641,14 @@
> else if (NT_SUCCESS(Status))
> {
> /* We know up-front how much data to expect, check the caller's
> buffer */
> - *ResultLength = ReturnLength;
> - if (ReturnLength <= BufferLength)
> + *ResultLength = ReturnLength + (NullTerminate ?
> sizeof(UNICODE_NULL) : 0);
> + if (*ResultLength <= BufferLength)
> {
> /* Buffer is all good, copy the data */
> RtlCopyMemory(PropertyBuffer, Data, ReturnLength);
>
> - /* Check for properties that require a null-terminated string
> */
> - if ((DeviceProperty == DevicePropertyEnumeratorName) ||
> - (DeviceProperty ==
> DevicePropertyPhysicalDeviceObjectName))
> + /* Check if we need to NULL-terminate the string */
> + if (NullTerminate)
> {
> /* Terminate the string */
> ((PWCHAR)PropertyBuffer)[ReturnLength / sizeof(WCHAR)] =
> UNICODE_NULL;
>
>
>
Never depend on this!
Depending on funcs.h including types.h of the same module is fine, but you
should not depend on rtlfuncs dependong on pstypes.
Best regards,
Alex Ionescu
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 8:57 AM, <akhaldi(a)svn.reactos.org> wrote:
> #define NTOS_MODE_USER
> -#include <ndk/pstypes.h>
> #include <ndk/rtlfuncs.h>
>
Maybe you could add all the other changes with checkin comments such
as "this should be sent upstream to wine" to that plan too :)
That practice has become quite common these days.
Ged.
Sent from my Windows Phone From: Jérôme Gardou
Sent: 09 August 2011 22:32
To: ros-dev(a)reactos.org
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [jgardou] 53152: [RPCRT4] - restore
lost ros specific change. Thanks Vic.
Don't worry, it's part of the plan!
Le 09/08/2011 23:29, Ged Murphy a écrit :
> Call me nuts, but why don't you add a ros_diff patch so it doesn't get
> lost again???
> From: jgardou(a)svn.reactos.org
> Sent: 09 August 2011 18:43
> To: ros-diffs(a)reactos.org
> Subject: [ros-diffs] [jgardou] 53152: [RPCRT4] - restore lost ros
> specific change. Thanks Vic.
> Author: jgardou
> Date: Tue Aug 9 17:43:37 2011
> New Revision: 53152
>
> URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=53152&view=rev
> Log:
> [RPCRT4]
> - restore lost ros specific change.
> Thanks Vic.
>
> Modified:
> trunk/reactos/dll/win32/rpcrt4/ndr_marshall.c
>
> Modified: trunk/reactos/dll/win32/rpcrt4/ndr_marshall.c
> URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/reactos/dll/win32/rpcrt4/ndr_marsh…
> ==============================================================================
> --- trunk/reactos/dll/win32/rpcrt4/ndr_marshall.c [iso-8859-1] (original)
> +++ trunk/reactos/dll/win32/rpcrt4/ndr_marshall.c [iso-8859-1] Tue Aug
> 9 17:43:37 2011
> @@ -6159,6 +6159,7 @@
> case RPC_FC_WCHAR:
> case RPC_FC_SHORT:
> case RPC_FC_USHORT:
> + case RPC_FC_ENUM16:
> {
> USHORT d;
> align_pointer(&pStubMsg->Buffer, sizeof(USHORT));
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Call me nuts, but why don't you add a ros_diff patch so it doesn't get
lost again???
From: jgardou(a)svn.reactos.org
Sent: 09 August 2011 18:43
To: ros-diffs(a)reactos.org
Subject: [ros-diffs] [jgardou] 53152: [RPCRT4] - restore lost ros
specific change. Thanks Vic.
Author: jgardou
Date: Tue Aug 9 17:43:37 2011
New Revision: 53152
URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=53152&view=rev
Log:
[RPCRT4]
- restore lost ros specific change.
Thanks Vic.
Modified:
trunk/reactos/dll/win32/rpcrt4/ndr_marshall.c
Modified: trunk/reactos/dll/win32/rpcrt4/ndr_marshall.c
URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/reactos/dll/win32/rpcrt4/ndr_marsh…
==============================================================================
--- trunk/reactos/dll/win32/rpcrt4/ndr_marshall.c [iso-8859-1] (original)
+++ trunk/reactos/dll/win32/rpcrt4/ndr_marshall.c [iso-8859-1] Tue Aug
9 17:43:37 2011
@@ -6159,6 +6159,7 @@
case RPC_FC_WCHAR:
case RPC_FC_SHORT:
case RPC_FC_USHORT:
+ case RPC_FC_ENUM16:
{
USHORT d;
align_pointer(&pStubMsg->Buffer, sizeof(USHORT));
Hello everybody,
Due to a mistake from my side, the uploaded BuildBot 7zipped ISO files
in the revision range from 53120 to 53127 as created by the Debug
Buildslave contained the very same ISO of revision 53119. This has been
fixed in the meantime, the faulty files have been removed from the
server and at least the 7-Zip archive of revision 53127 has been recreated.
On the other hand, Olaf and I have finally enabled his server to upload
ISOs to http://iso.reactos.org. These ISOs are built by his Buildslave
running under Windows, already using the new CMake buildsystem and
incorporating our regression tests and the Gecko CAB file.
I might have time to add another filter to http://reactos.org/getbuilds
soon, so that everybody can download the new ISOs easily.
- Colin