Ros-dev

ros-dev@reactos.org

5788 discussions

ReactOS & the Opensource World Conference (Malaga, 2010)

by victor martinez

Opensource World Conference (Malaga, 2010), is accepting papers for the meeting that is going to take place on 27/28 October. "The Open Source World Conference (OSWC) is probably the most important European event related to open source technologies. Following six editions of this conference organized by the regional governments of Andalusia and Extremadura in collaboration with the most important companies in the sector, this conference has become a unique event open to everyone interested in the field of software innovation, from users, social agents and developers, through to business leaders, investors and members of public administrations." Andalusia and Extremadura governments are pushing quite hard toward the Opensource administration.They are working together to use just Opensource apps and OSes in their Universities and Administrations. Actually they have created some Opensource OSes as Guadalinex(a Linux distro) and some opensource organizations to push and support opensource ideas. In this conference companies and investors will meet, so maybe we can find some kind of Companies or Government support. Projects, this year, will be elected by votes. Other projects are pushing quite hard. So as this is not another OpenSource meeting but THE OpenSource meeting, I want you to push and vote. We made in Sourceforge Awards and we can do it again. Creating an user takes less than 1 minute: http://www.opensourceworldconference.com/malaga10/?q=en/user/register Vote "5-star" in this page(after Login): http://www.opensourceworldconference.com/malaga10/?q=node/953 I promise to make my best PR to find in this meeting any ReactOS opportunity. If there is any, I will find it. :) _________________________________________________________________ Accede a tu Hotmail en un solo clic ¡Descárgate Internet Explorer 8 y empieza a disfrutar de todas las ventajas! http://www.ayudartepodria.com/

14 years, 1 month

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [akhaldi] 48293: [CMAKE] - Add dxsdk interfaces to build.

by Timo Kreuzer

> +MACRO (MACRO_ADD_DXSDK_INTERFACES) > + > + FOREACH(_in_FILE ${ARGN}) > + > + GET_FILENAME_COMPONENT(FILE ${_in_FILE} NAME_WE) > + > + ADD_CUSTOM_COMMAND( > + OUTPUT ${REACTOS_BINARY_DIR}/include/dxsdk/${FILE}.h > + COMMAND native-widl -I${REACTOS_SOURCE_DIR}/include/dxsdk -I. -I${REACTOS_SOURCE_DIR}/include -I${REACTOS_SOURCE_DIR}/include/psdk -m32 --win32 -h -H ${REACTOS_BINARY_DIR}/include/dxsdk/${FILE}.h ${REACTOS_SOURCE_DIR}/include/dxsdk/${FILE}.idl > + DEPENDS native-widl > + ) > + > + SET_SOURCE_FILES_PROPERTIES( > + ${REACTOS_BINARY_DIR}/include/dxsdk/${FILE}.h > + PROPERTIES > + GENERATED TRUE > + ) > + > + LIST(APPEND DXSDK_HEADERS ${REACTOS_BINARY_DIR}/include/dxsdk/${FILE}.h) > + > + ENDFOREACH(_in_FILE ${ARGN}) > + > +ENDMACRO (MACRO_ADD_DXSDK_INTERFACES) > + > +file(GLOB_RECURSE SOURCE "*.idl") > + > +LIST(REMOVE_ITEM SOURCE ${REACTOS_SOURCE_DIR}/include/dxsdk/axcore.idl) > +LIST(REMOVE_ITEM SOURCE ${REACTOS_SOURCE_DIR}/include/dxsdk/axextend.idl) > +LIST(REMOVE_ITEM SOURCE ${REACTOS_SOURCE_DIR}/include/dxsdk/devenum.idl) > +LIST(REMOVE_ITEM SOURCE ${REACTOS_SOURCE_DIR}/include/dxsdk/dshowasf.idl) > +LIST(REMOVE_ITEM SOURCE ${REACTOS_SOURCE_DIR}/include/dxsdk/dyngraph.idl) > +LIST(REMOVE_ITEM SOURCE ${REACTOS_SOURCE_DIR}/include/dxsdk/vmrender.idl) > + > +MACRO_ADD_DXSDK_INTERFACES(${SOURCE}) > + > +ADD_CUSTOM_TARGET(dxsdk ALL DEPENDS ${DXSDK_HEADERS}) > Beautiful!

14 years, 2 months

Freetype Patented Hinting

by Ros Arm

Hello, A recent CMAKE commit has made me notice that a NOSWPAT option determines if FreeType hinting should be used or not. Please note that the Apple patent on the technology recently expired, and this option is not needed anymore, as hinting should always be enabled. -r

14 years, 2 months

ReactOS x64 edition

by Timo Kreuzer

Hi, I'd like to announce that as of r48278, you can build a full x64 bootcd (including rostests, not rosapps) from trunk. That means from now on, I can quickly see when someone breaks 64 bit compatibility: http://reactos.ath.cx:8081/waterfall So please don't cast PVOID to ULONG ;-) Regards, Timo PS: no, it doesn't boot to desktop

14 years, 2 months

freeldr as PE file

by Timo Kreuzer

Hi I'd like to propose a small change: converting freeldr into a PE file. The current freeldr / setupldr are raw binaries, which makes them easy to handle for the bootsector but it disqualifies them from proper debugging with gdb. A solution is to convert them into PE format. As there is no space to implement a real PE loader in the bootsector, the image must not use a .bss section, this can easily be done with a linker script. I have this working in my WC. With the result we can use gdb for debugging freeldr including symbols. The only thing still to solve is how to remove rsym data from the files, without stripping all symbols. Rsym data makes the file twice as big, too big to be loaded in to real mode memory. Any objections / suggestions? Regards, Timo

14 years, 2 months

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [cgutman] 48221: - Fix epic naming fail (DhcpEnabled -> EnableDH

by Johannes Anderwald

> - DWORD Error = ERROR_SUCCESS, DhcpEnabled; > + DWORD Error = ERROR_SUCCESS, DhcpEnabled, Length; > [...] > + Error = RegQueryValueEx(AdapterKey, "EnableDHCP", NULL, NULL, (LPBYTE)&DhcpEnabled, &Length); IMO Length needs to be initialized first > + > + if (Error != ERROR_SUCCESS || Length != sizeof(DWORD)) > DhcpEnabled = 1; > > CloseHandle(AdapterKey); regards Johannes [1] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms724911%28VS.85%29.aspx

14 years, 2 months

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [dreimer] 48036: Bug 5501: [PATCH] Adding Wing32support by Carlo Bramini

by Aleksey Bragin

What's that massive reactos.dff change introduced with this rev? -------------------------------------------------- From: <dreimer(a)svn.reactos.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 2:59 PM To: <ros-diffs(a)reactos.org> Subject: [ros-diffs] [dreimer] 48036: Bug 5501: [PATCH] Adding Wing32support by Carlo Bramini > Author: dreimer > Date: Wed Jul 14 10:59:32 2010 > New Revision: 48036 > > URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=48036&view=rev > Log: > Bug 5501: [PATCH] Adding Wing32 support by Carlo Bramini > > Added: > trunk/reactos/dll/win32/wing32/ > trunk/reactos/dll/win32/wing32/wing32.c (with props) > trunk/reactos/dll/win32/wing32/wing32.rbuild (with props) > trunk/reactos/dll/win32/wing32/wing32.spec (with props) > Modified: > trunk/reactos/boot/bootdata/packages/reactos.dff > trunk/reactos/dll/win32/win32.rbuild

14 years, 2 months

ReactOS compatibility Database --- Still testing in 0.3.11

by Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo

Hi all, im visiting the compatibility database page frequently, and im still seeing people testing applications against 0.3.1 .... 0.3.11 is too old currently, there have been tons of bugfixes, new features, and overall changes that affect many applications since 0.3.11 release. Lots of them have changed their behavior into ReactOS since those changes. What i want to say is, compatibility with 0.3.11 is quite meaningful right now, due to massive changes in ReactOS lately. Lets use HEAD revisions to test new apps, and report bugs against it :) cheers!

14 years, 3 months

[ros-diffs] [jgardou] 47802: Merge 47800 from yarotows branch.

by James Tabor

Jérôme, Need to go through your commit list and check and see which ones need to be pushed to the trunk. So far as I see (read), the changes look good. Thanks, James

14 years, 3 months

Build process changes...

by Timo Kreuzer

After Olaf's mentioning of increased buildtimes I'd like to throw 2 different, independent and major changes to our build process into discussion. One is about rbuild and one is about the file layout. I'd like to start with the rbuild related topic. What I suggest only for consideration, is a move away from rbuild and instead using CMake. CMake is available for Windows and *nix, for Windows both as commandline ans as a lightweight gui tool. It is capable of translating a portable buildfile format into different makefile formats, including nmake and project files for VS and CodeBlocks. It seems incredibly fast compared to rbuild and probably provides every feature we ever need. Although the syntax is a tiny bit more complex than rbuild files, it's much better than writing makefiles. Adding support for building with MSVC should be relatively easy. It's not really a suggestion, as I'm not sure about all the details, but I think it's worth reviewing and taking into consideration. The second thing is about the file layout. I will post a seperate mail soon. Regards, Timo

14 years, 3 months

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Ros-dev