Ros-dev

ros-dev@reactos.org

5790 discussions

Start a nNew thread

Re: [ros-dev] Trunk freeze
by Aleksey Bragin 08 Jul '07

08 Jul '07

Trunk unfrozen, guilty revision partially reverted. WBR, Aleksey Bragin.

1 0

Trunk freeze
by Aleksey Bragin 08 Jul '07

08 Jul '07

Hello, trunk is frozen right now due to inability to boot into 2nd stage (it crashes with "Failure rendering glyph"). As soon as the issue is fixed, trunk will be unfrozen. Thanks for your patience. WBR, Aleksey Bragin.

1 0

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [ekohl] 27514: - Fix indentation. - Replace tabs by spaces. - Replace STDCALL by WINAPI. - Replace Alex' unreadable single-line statements by readable ones. - No code changes.
by Alex Ionescu 08 Jul '07

08 Jul '07

While I don't mind your other re-formats, what's the purpose of insulting my code (which respected ReactOS Coding Guidelines, (please read them: http://www.reactos.org/wiki/index.php/Coding_Style)) and replacing it with non-ReactOS compliant code? Is a 71-character line so hard to read? -----Original Message----- From: ros-diffs-bounces(a)reactos.org [mailto:ros-diffs-bounces@reactos.org] On Behalf Of ekohl(a)svn.reactos.org Sent: July 8, 2007 1:09 PM To: ros-diffs(a)reactos.org Subject: [ros-diffs] [ekohl] 27514: - Fix indentation. - Replace tabs by spaces. - Replace STDCALL by WINAPI. - Replace Alex' unreadable single-line statements by readable ones. - No code changes. Author: ekohl Date: Mon Jul 9 00:09:22 2007 New Revision: 27514 URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=27514&view=rev Log: - Fix indentation. - Replace tabs by spaces. - Replace STDCALL by WINAPI. - Replace Alex' unreadable single-line statements by readable ones. - No code changes. Modified: trunk/reactos/dll/win32/kernel32/file/npipe.c Modified: trunk/reactos/dll/win32/kernel32/file/npipe.c URL:

1 0

Update patches into BugZilla
by carlo.bramix 07 Jul '07

07 Jul '07

Hello, I updated the patch into bug #2356 and I generated it with "svn diff regedit" instead of using "diff -u" or Winmerge with a local copy. I should do the same with the other patches that I posted, am I right? Sincerely, Carlo Bramini. ---------- Initial Header ----------- >From : ros-dev-bounces(a)reactos.org To : "ros-dev" ros-dev(a)reactos.org Cc : Date : Thu, 5 Jul 2007 13:55:47 +0200 Subject : [ros-dev] Italian fixes to TaskMgr > Hello, > I posted some fixes to bug #2365. > It fixes few things into the italian translation and I did a small improvement of the source code into affinity.c > > Sincerely, > > Carlo Bramini > > > > ------------------------------------------------------ > Leggi GRATIS le tue mail con il telefonino i-mode di Wind > http://i-mode.wind.it/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > Ros-dev(a)reactos.org > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > ------------------------------------------------------ Scegli infostrada: ADSL gratis per tutta lestate e telefoni senza canone Telecom http://click.libero.it/infostrada

2 1

Italian fixes to TaskMgr
by carlo.bramix 05 Jul '07

05 Jul '07

Hello, I posted some fixes to bug #2365. It fixes few things into the italian translation and I did a small improvement of the source code into affinity.c Sincerely, Carlo Bramini ------------------------------------------------------ Leggi GRATIS le tue mail con il telefonino i-mode di Wind http://i-mode.wind.it/

1 0

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [cwittich] 27397: ZeroMemory the correct amount of bytes
by Aleksey Bragin 05 Jul '07

05 Jul '07

I think those changes are incorrect, because you're effectively zeroing sizeof(void *) instead of zeroing sizeof(PORT_DEVICE_EXTENSION). WBR, Aleksey Bragin. On Jul 5, 2007, at 5:24 AM, cwittich(a)svn.reactos.org wrote: > Author: cwittich > Date: Thu Jul 5 05:24:57 2007 > New Revision: 27397 > > URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=27397&view=rev > Log: > ZeroMemory the correct amount of bytes > > Modified: > trunk/reactos/drivers/input/kbdclass/kbdclass.c > > Modified: trunk/reactos/drivers/input/kbdclass/kbdclass.c > URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/reactos/drivers/input/ > kbdclass/kbdclass.c?rev=27397&r1=27396&r2=27397&view=diff > ====================================================================== > ======== > --- trunk/reactos/drivers/input/kbdclass/kbdclass.c (original) > +++ trunk/reactos/drivers/input/kbdclass/kbdclass.c Thu Jul 5 > 05:24:57 2007 > @@ -695,7 +695,7 @@ > } > > DeviceExtension = (PPORT_DEVICE_EXTENSION)Fdo->DeviceExtension; > - RtlZeroMemory(DeviceExtension, sizeof(CLASS_DEVICE_EXTENSION)); > + RtlZeroMemory(DeviceExtension, sizeof(PPORT_DEVICE_EXTENSION)); > DeviceExtension->Common.IsClassDO = FALSE; > DeviceExtension->DeviceObject = Fdo; > DeviceExtension->PnpState = dsStopped; > >

2 1

Re: [ros-dev] BugFixing in RegEdit
by carlo.bramix 04 Jul '07

04 Jul '07

Hello, following the suggestions that I received, I would like put your attention on these patches posted into bugzilla: - patch Posted into bug #2356. It closes these bugs: #982: some languages had IDOK and IDCANCEL in conflict because both declared as DEFPUSHBUTTON. It should be fixed. #1009: Context menu is now fully working. Fixed. - Patch posted into bug #2356. It fixes itself. - Patch posted into bug #2232 It fixes itself and some unsignaled bugs. I hope I didn't mistakes this time. Sincerely, Carlo Bramini. ---------- Initial Header ----------- >From : ros-dev-bounces(a)reactos.org To : "ReactOS Development List" ros-dev(a)reactos.org Cc : Date : Tue, 03 Jul 2007 12:30:36 +0200 Subject : Re: [ros-dev] BugFixing in RegEdit > carlo.bramix ha scritto: > > I'm also wondering why the patches sent to bugzilla aren't replied too. > > I don't know, perhaps I'm just unlucky. > > Just misguided. You post on Bugzilla for the posterity, and then you > post your Bugzilla number on the mailing list for the attention. You > need to get noticed *and* remembered. > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > Ros-dev(a)reactos.org > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > ------------------------------------------------------ Scegli infostrada: ADSL gratis per tutta lestate e telefoni senza canone Telecom http://click.libero.it/infostrada

1 0

GPLv3 Migration - flamewar warning
by Steven Edwards 04 Jul '07

04 Jul '07

Hi, I've been inactive for a while and most likely will be so for a while however I thought this would be a good time to bring up the GPLv3 due to its recent release. Does anyone have any objections to license as it stands now? If you've not had a chance to review it I suggest you do so. I am happy to help answer any questions regarding the license as I did take part in early drafting on behalf of the ReactOS and Wine Projects although I am not a lawyer and anything I say should be at least reviewed by the SFLC or your own lawyers. It is my suggestion that if there are no objections then we start to contact each developer requesting them to dual license existing code as GPLv2/GPLv3 and use the same tracking system as the audit system to do the migration. ReactOS has never been really clear on the "or later version" clause in the GPL. The ReactOS license includes the text and the license number is not specified in most of the ReactOS sources, though I don't think it would be fair to simply take all of the source and re-license it without some discussions and a vote. It would also be possible to distribute ReactOS under both licenses via dual licensing as a possible compromise if a dispute arises. This would mean if some third party (Third Party A) wants to take ReactOS enhance it and then resell it, they would not have to worry about another third party (Third Party B) taking their modifications and redistributing them for profit without the patent protections of the GPLv3 and the Anti-Tivoization clauses. The only downside to this is if Third Party A is only making changes under GPLv3 then those changes could not go back in to ReactOS trunk. I don't think this is a major issue, as I expect both third parties to be proprietary vendors making enhancements that the Project might not want/need in the trunk in any case. Third Party A in the interest of keeping forking to a minimal would still send bug fixes back up both licenses. Thanks -- Steven Edwards "There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world, and that is an idea whose time has come." - Victor Hugo

10 21

Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [fireball] 27202: - Finally, removing frame pointer was a bad idea (think of exceptions / etc).
by Aleksey Bragin 03 Jul '07

03 Jul '07

No, I reverted all those "funny" things in revision 27367. WBR, Aleksey. On Jul 3, 2007, at 3:47 AM, Alex Ionescu wrote: > Have they been un-separated or are they still under one large file? > > -- > Best regards, > Alex Ionescu

2 1

Re: [ros-dev] BugFixing in RegEdit
by carlo.bramix 03 Jul '07

03 Jul '07

Ciao Gabriel, ti ringrazio per l'offerta, tuttavia non credo di poter accettare. Il PC "potente" e' un computer Pentium 4 3GHz che mi hanno fornito al lavoro per sbrigare una commessa. Spero, ma in realta' e' molto di piu' di una speranza, che possa diventare il mio PC definitivo. Infatti, il "vecchio" Pentium 3 lo rifilero' per svolgere il lavoro in oggetto. Anzi, mi sembra addirittura sovrastimato per quello che deve fare. Il PC che uso a casa e': Pentium 200 MHz con MMX. 48 MB di RAM Scheda video S3 VIRGE DX con 4 MB di ram. Harddisk 6.4GB (con 200 MB liberi). Monitor/tastiera/mouse. Continuo a tenere questo PC per questi motivi: 1) Per quello che devo fare io basta e avanza, ovvero scrivere e compilare codice. Nel caso specifico di ROS, io mi scarico solo i sorgenti delle applicazioni che mi interessano. Ora come ora, le compilo singolarmente e le verifico comodamente anche cosi'. E poi, tutto sommato, e' anche uno stimolo per fare meglio le cose. Se in un programma c'e' qualche cosa di inefficiente, sul mio PC si vede subito! 2) Il mio PC ha lo slot ISA. Di per se' si potrebbe pensare che sia una cavolata, ma io ho un paio di schede (tra cui i gloriosi emulatori per microcontrollore Hitachi H8) che si innestano proprio li'. La Renesas (la societa' che ha comprato e distribuisce i chip della famiglia H8) vende oggi prodotti che fanno la stessa cosa di queste schede, ma che si attaccano all'USB. Anni fa ne avevo fatto comprare uno, ma sono un'autentica porcheria, e' molto meglio quello che aveva fatto la Hitachi, anche se va su bus ISA. 3) Ho una certa linea di pensiero riguardo le applicazioni che girano sui computer. Mi rifiuto di credere che una macchina come la mia, sicuramente vetusta, non sia comunque in grado di far girare decentemente certi tipi di applicazioni. Un esempio di cio' di cui ti sto parlando: non mi era possibile vedere fluidamente i filmati DivX. Cosi' ho lavorato per un tot di tempo con il team dell'Xvid e voila': problema in buona parte risolto (per fortuna!). 4) Ci sono affezionato, l'ho comprato nel Natale del 1997(!) con i soldini guadagnati dal tirocinio fatto in un'azienda per conto del Politecnico di Torino. Il primo computer tutto mio! 5) Il case e' un desktop (di quelli che stanno comodamente sotto il monitor) e non un minitower cosi' tanto in voga oggi (chissa' poi perche'). Non avrei davvero lo spazio per un case diverso. Io abito vicino a Biella. A presto, Carlo. PS: Al momento della scrittura di questo messaggio, non c'e' stato ancora un'anima che mi abbia dato delle risposte. Bugfix su bugzilla: niente risposte. Bugfix direttamente su mailing list: niente risposte. Dannazione! Non ho ancora capito cosa ci vuole per mettere su un paio di varianti da due soldi... Non metto in dubbio il fatto che le varianti vorrebbero comunque provarle e riprovarle prima di dire "ok, chiudiamo il bug" e potrebbero non avere il tempo materiale di fare cio', pero'... il silenzio e' davvero seccante! A proposito, ce l'hai fatta poi a compilare con le mie patch? ---------- Initial Header ----------- >From : ros-dev-bounces(a)reactos.org To : ros-dev(a)reactos.org Cc : Date : Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:34:09 +0000 Subject : Re: [ros-dev] BugFixing in RegEdit > Ciao Carlo, > > ti faccio qualche domandina? Hai detto che avevi che computer prima? E > adesso hai uno nuovo temporaneo? Di dove sei? Ti chiedo perché eventualmente > penso di aver un PIII da qualche parte, che sarei disposto a regalarti > perché tu possa collaborare in reactos... > Gabriel. > > _________________________________________________________________ > Cinema, Tv, Gossip e OrsoscopoTutto su MSN intrattenimento! > http://intrattenimento.it.msn.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-dev mailing list > Ros-dev(a)reactos.org > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev > ------------------------------------------------------ Scegli infostrada: ADSL gratis per tutta lestate e telefoni senza canone Telecom http://click.libero.it/infostrada

3 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Ros-dev