Ros-dev

ros-dev@reactos.org

5790 discussions

by Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton

hi, thought people might want to know: rpcclient.exe already was confirmed as working (by elrond) i just successfully compiled and tested smbclient, that works too. rpcclient.exe produces a _beautiful_ blue screen, i fell about when i saw this. elrond has a patch for smbd which removes fork() and i want to try this out and also make the msrpc services do the same thing, that will be fuuun. the sooner someone gets freedce to compile on mingw32 the damn better is all i can say there. i found some example code that uses NamedPipes i intend to add that in at both the client side and the server side and see what breaks, oo that will be fun i've never done nt named pipes programming before. l. -- -- <a href="http://lkcl.net">http://lkcl.net</a> --

20 years, 1 month

Re: SMSS & LSASS: Service Status

by Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton

regarding your offer to help with LSASS.... GREAT! because, coincidentally, this is exactly one of the areas required to tie in MSV1_0.DLL which will be a registererer with the LSASS, and MSV1_0.DLL is where all the nt authentication stuff happens. great, great. okay, here's something i found which describes the process, it looks pretty damn good: http://www.coresecurity.com/common/showdoc.php?idx=87&idxseccion=11 now, here's the bit that you _don't_ have to do: you do NOT have to do _any_ of the bits _behind_ "access the sam database". all of that is already written for you - in samba tng. i've had a _brief_ look at the implementation of lsass in reactos, and i believe it to be pretty good. it's just that there are no "registerers" e.g. there is no implementation of MSV1_0.DLL. l. -- -- <a href="http://lkcl.net">http://lkcl.net</a> --

20 years, 1 month

Can someone send me the MS sound blaster driver example code?

by Andrew "Silver Blade" Greenwood

Someone sent me this a while back, but I lost it. Basically I believe it was from a MS DDK, and it contained code for MMDRV.DLL and SNDBLST.SYS. At the time I was feeling lazy and just clumsily hacked in whatever I felt like, without any order to what I was doing. I want to have another stab at it, by reviewing the existing code, documenting it for my own understanding, and then writing my own solution. So if someone could send me those files, I'd appreciate it! -Andrew PS: The files in question were NOT obtained from the leaked Windows source code.

20 years, 1 month

Frequent commits?

by Reuben Perelman

Lately I've seen a lot of updates to svn. Is it just a lot of work being done, or is there some type of revert war?

20 years, 1 month

Re: [ros-svn] [hpoussin] 17751: Fix build, by correcting include paths and updating xml files of USB components

by TwoTailedFox

Corrected, just as I was trying to work out while it wasn't compiling with Mingw ;) On 9/8/05, hpoussin(a)svn.reactos.com <hpoussin(a)svn.reactos.com> wrote: > Fix build, by correcting include paths and updating xml files of USB components > > > Added files: > trunk/reactos/drivers/usb/usbport/usbport.def > > Updated files: > trunk/reactos/drivers/usb/miniport/linux/pci_hal.c > trunk/reactos/drivers/usb/miniport/usbohci/ohci-hcd.c > trunk/reactos/drivers/usb/miniport/usbohci/ohci_main.c > trunk/reactos/drivers/usb/miniport/usbohci/usbohci.xml > trunk/reactos/drivers/usb/miniport/usbuhci/uhci-hcd.c > trunk/reactos/drivers/usb/miniport/usbuhci/uhci.h > trunk/reactos/drivers/usb/miniport/usbuhci/usbuhci.xml > trunk/reactos/drivers/usb/usbhub/usbhub.h > trunk/reactos/drivers/usb/usbhub/usbhub.xml > trunk/reactos/drivers/usb/usbport/buffer_simple.c > trunk/reactos/drivers/usb/usbport/config.c > trunk/reactos/drivers/usb/usbport/core_drivers/usbkey.c > trunk/reactos/drivers/usb/usbport/core_drivers/usbmouse.c > trunk/reactos/drivers/usb/usbport/hcd-pci.c > trunk/reactos/drivers/usb/usbport/hcd.c > trunk/reactos/drivers/usb/usbport/hub.c > trunk/reactos/drivers/usb/usbport/message.c > trunk/reactos/drivers/usb/usbport/urb.c > trunk/reactos/drivers/usb/usbport/usb-debug.c > trunk/reactos/drivers/usb/usbport/usb.c > trunk/reactos/drivers/usb/usbport/usbcore.c > trunk/reactos/drivers/usb/usbport/usbport.xml > > Deleted files: > trunk/reactos/drivers/usb/usbport/usbcore.def > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-svn mailing list > Ros-svn(a)reactos.com > http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-svn > -- "I had a handle on life, but then it broke"

20 years, 1 month

Re: [ros-svn] [ion] 17727: Implement NTDLL's CSR routines in a compatible way. Fix prototypes, argument count, deprecated functions and new functions. Some functions will not work (or are designed not to work) fully until the new CSR is committed, but they keep the same functionality as the previous versions (no regressions found; tested with cmd, cmt, putty, telnet, ps). Also added NtSecureConnectPort.

by Hartmut Birr

Hi, this changes does break booting for me. I get an error message: (subsys\csrss\api\wapi.c:198) CSR: NtListenPort() failed, status=c0000005 - Hartmut

20 years, 1 month

Replacement for Bitstream fonts

by Mikhail Y. Zvyozdochkin

Hi All. I think it's a good idea to use Dejavu fonts http://dejavu.sourceforge.net/ instead Bitstream Vera. Reasons are: - it based on Bitstream fonts (1.10); - it's distributing under SAME license; BUT - it supported MUCH more unicode pages than original Bitstream fonts; it was main goal of Dejavu Projects "to provide a wider range of characters", to support various languages and codepages. In particular, I tried to activate Russian language in ReactOS 0.2.7-REL with Dejavu fonts. It working correctly without any proprietary fonts :). Unicode coverage table: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/dejavu/dejavu-fonts/unicov… At this September they want make new release, 1.14. I think, it new version may be integrated with ReactOS 0.3 :) WBR, DarkHobbit

20 years, 1 month

problem with current svn

by Hartmut Birr

Hi, I'm trying to compile ros on ros with the current svn tree. It isn't possible. After some time, it fails with a message cannot execute 'bla bla'. The build does corrupt the file system. If I run chkdsk from w2k I get many messages about multiple files like 'wrc.ex'. It seems that something is wrong with the string functions. - Hartmut

20 years, 1 month

RE: Ros-dev Digest, Vol 13, Issue 14

by Lucio Diaz

Sorry, but i still cant see the point. 0.2.7 is a release, and thus is oriented to the user (maybe power user or fan at this moment), to test and play around. Users, like me, dont go to bugzilla cause most of us can not make sense of all that techicall information. I knew there was a problem, a blocking problem for anyone trying to install the OS in real hardware and i wrote about it where a user (like me) may find out, in the wiki. I can not understand why you become angry. I am just filling some documentation for the user, and that is the only whay i can colaborate ( i doubt you would apretiate my little pascal and delphy coding skill). Known problems is for that... enumerating the known problems of a determinated version, while 0.2.7 is the last version i consider relevant the fact that it can not be installed in Real Hardware. I wish i could debug and find the problem, but i dont have the experience or the tools to do so. with my best wishes to the team, Lucio Diaz. WaxDragon wrote--> Message: 5 Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 13:15:19 -0400 From: WaxDragon <waxdragon(a)gmail.com> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] RE: Ros-dev Digest, Vol 13, Issue 13 To: ReactOS Development List <ros-dev(a)reactos.com> Message-ID: <9b0d5f3205090710157abc163f(a)mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I think you missed the point. I'm talking about http://www.reactos.com/wiki/index.php/Known_Problems When calling things "known problems" I want bugs for them. I'm going to assume you are talking about this known problem: http://www.reactos.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=688 Which was even noted on the 0.2.7 changelog page: http://www.reactos.com/wiki/index.php/ChangeLog-0.2.7#Known_Bugs PLEASE, if you write ANYWHERE that ReactOS has a "known bug" please provide a link to the bug in bugzilla. If there is no bug in BugZilla, then there is a great possibility the Testing team doesn't know about it. By filing bugs, we can reduce the amount of duplicate effort required to fix said bug. When filing bugs, please review http://www.reactos.com/wiki/index.php/File_Bugs first. With that out of the way, I know that noone has looked at that bug since 0.2.7 was released. If you can gather any useful info about the hardware (the i8042 controller specifically) that you are experienceing the problem with, update the bug, this may help with getting it resolved. WD PS. I'm very tempted to make the "Know Problems" page go away, or heavily modify it. ______________________________________________ Renovamos el Correo Yahoo! Nuevos servicios, más seguridad http://correo.yahoo.es

20 years, 1 month

RE: Ros-dev Digest, Vol 13, Issue 13

by Lucio Diaz

> Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 08:42:13 -0400 > From: WaxDragon <waxdragon(a)gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Bootcd installation failure > To: ReactOS Development List <ros-dev(a)reactos.com> > Message-ID: > <9b0d5f32050906054215dd322b(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > Well, I have no idea what Lucio means by that "known > problem", since > he isn't very specific. 17600 is not even close to > where we forked > 0.2.7. I remember there were some problems around > then. Try 17604, I > personally tested that rev and it seemed to work ok. > > In the future, if you are going to call something a > "known problem" > please link to the bug in Bugzilla. If the "known > problem" isn't in > bugzilla, it isn't "known" as far as I care. > > Thanks > WD > I reported it in both the general and dev mailing lists, it happens in real hardware in two complitely diferent computers, one Intel and one AMD, with completely diferent OSes as base instalation and both with previus sucesfull reactos instalations. In both the instalation CD hangs before installing anything (maybe reading the partitions?) to the Hard drive. Not many people test reactos in Real Hardware, but i was told the problem was already known. I have not tested the SVN since long so i can not say if it is solved. Still it is a KNOW reproducible problem of 0.2.7. With best regards, Lucio Diaz. ______________________________________________ Renovamos el Correo Yahoo! Nuevos servicios, más seguridad http://correo.yahoo.es

20 years, 1 month

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Ros-dev