Ros-dev

ros-dev@reactos.org

1 participants
5793 discussions

Timing tests
by Murphy, Ged (Bolton) 20 May '05

20 May '05

I've been working on some code which involves timing and while I have been getting good results in XP, I've not been getting the same results in ROS. I'm unsure as to whether this is due to missing functionality in ROS, or the fact that I'm using an emulator. If I put together a few tests researching different timing methods, could someone running ROS on real hardware run the tests for me, as I don't have access to machine I can run them one. Thanks, Ged. ************************************************************************ The information contained in this message or any of its attachments is confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee. The information may also be legally privileged. The views expressed may not be company policy, but the personal views of the originator. If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please contact postmaster(a)exideuk.co.uk <mailto:postmaster@exideuk.co.uk> and then delete this message. Exide Technologies is an industrial and transportation battery producer and recycler with operations in 89 countries. Further information can be found at www.exide.com

2 1

RE: [ros-svn] [arty] 15429: Turned on -Werror
by PETREOLLE Sylvain 20 May '05

20 May '05

Channel rule #2: Congrats to Art ! Cordialement, Usurp(aka Sylvain PETREOLLE) Service de Production & d'Exploitation Informatique GEFCO - #DMIT/DATO/PSI/PEI Mail : <mailto:exploit@gefco.fr> Tel : 01.49.05.29.29 -----Message d'origine----- De : arty(a)svn.reactos.com [mailto:arty@svn.reactos.com] Envoyé : vendredi 20 mai 2005 10:07 À : ros-svn(a)reactos.com Objet : [ros-svn] [arty] 15429: Turned on -Werror Turned on -Werror Propogate AdapterBinding rather than LogicalAdapter or MiniportBlock in places where we handle a request since we might need the protocol that did the request later on, get rid of LogicalAdapter completely as according to Filip, it's never needed. Also, remove the Packet context hack in send complete if possible as this is now unnecessary (we now send all needed information in the work item instead). MiniQueueWorkItem, MiniDequeueWorkItem and MiniDoRequest were all changed to take an AdapterBinding. Added MiniRequestComplete, which handles a request complete. Fixed hang in ipconfig and the tcpip control panel. Updated files: trunk/reactos/drivers/net/ndis/Makefile trunk/reactos/drivers/net/ndis/include/miniport.h trunk/reactos/drivers/net/ndis/include/ndissys.h trunk/reactos/drivers/net/ndis/ndis/miniport.c trunk/reactos/drivers/net/ndis/ndis/protocol.c _______________________________________________ Ros-svn mailing list Ros-svn(a)reactos.com http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-svn ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ce message ainsi que toutes pièces jointes (le "message") sont confidentiels et sont exclusivement destinés à l'usage de la personne à laquelle ils sont adressés. Tout point de vue ou toute opinion contenus dans ce message expriment la pensée personnelle de leur auteur et ne représentent pas nécessairement la position des sociétés du Groupe GEFCO. Si vous n'êtes pas la personne à laquelle ce message est destiné, veuillez noter que vous avez reçu cet e-mail par erreur et qu'il vous est strictement interdit d'utiliser, de diffuser, de transférer, d'imprimer ou de copier ce message. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, merci de contacter la personne qui vous l'a adressé et de l'effacer immédiatement. Les sociétés du Groupe GEFCO déclinent toute responsabilité en cas d'altération, de modification, d'édition, de diffusion sans autorisation de ce message ou en cas d'affection de ce message par un virus. This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom they are addressed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the GEFCO Group of Companies. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error please contact the sender and delete the message immediately. The GEFCO Group of Companies shall not be liable for the message if altered, changed, falsified, edited, diffused without authorization or affected by any virus. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

RE: [ros-svn] [Phreak] 15423: Removed invalid . from path in thisusetup ini file as a temporary fix. Next step is to removethe darn ini file entirely
by Casper Hornstrup 20 May '05

20 May '05

Which ini file? > -----Original Message----- > From: ros-svn-bounces(a)reactos.com [mailto:ros-svn-bounces@reactos.com] On Behalf Of > Phreak(a)svn.reactos.com > Sent: 20. maj 2005 04:22 > To: ros-svn(a)reactos.com > Subject: [ros-svn] [Phreak] 15423: Removed invalid . from path in thisusetup ini file as a > temporary fix. Next step is to removethe darn ini file entirely > > Removed invalid . from path in this usetup ini file as a temporary fix. Next step is to remove the > darn ini file entirely > > > Updated files: > trunk/reactos/bootdata/packages/reactos.dff > > _______________________________________________ > Ros-svn mailing list > Ros-svn(a)reactos.com > http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-svn

1 0

install problem
by Hartmut Birr 19 May '05

19 May '05

Hi, I'm not able to install reactos from the current svn with the bootcd. Usetup and the second stage setup works. After the next reboot, I get only a message box with 'Userint failed to start the shell!'. If I revert the changes from 15403 (using memory mapped files), I can install reactos. - Hartmut

2 1

[Fwd: Re: [ros-dev] install problem]
by Alex Ionescu 19 May '05

19 May '05

1 0

[Fwd: Re: [ros-dev] Re: [ros-svn] [hbirr] 15381: - Reference the file object in IopSecurityFile.]
by Alex Ionescu 19 May '05

19 May '05

1 0

Re: [ros-svn] [hbirr] 15381: - Reference the file object in IopSecurityFile.
by Alex Ionescu 19 May '05

19 May '05

hbirr(a)svn.reactos.com wrote: >- Reference the file object in IopSecurityFile. >- Don't set FO_DIRECT_DEVICE_OPEN in IoCreateStreamFileObject. >- Disabled the setting of IRP_NOCACHE, because vfat cannot handle cached and non cached requests for the same file. >- Set the correct device object in NtWriteFile. > > > > > > Hi, This change breaks usetup. As I said, IoCreateStreamFileObject must be left with the current hack intact. Best regards, Alex Ionescu

3 2

Re: [ros-svn] [ion] 15395: Object Manager Patch. This patch continues the work done in the previous patch and makes the following changes in order to support OB 2.0 (it basically temporarily fixes a highly incorrect implementation so that caller code will be ready to work with the OB 2.0 without change):
by Hartmut Birr 19 May '05

19 May '05

Hi, I'm not able to boot reactos after your last four commits. - Hartmut (io/pnpreport.c:84) IoReportResourceForDetection partly implemented (io/pnpreport.c:84) IoReportResourceForDetection partly implemented (io/pnpreport.c:84) IoReportResourceForDetection partly implemented (io/pnpreport.c:84) IoReportResourceForDetection partly implemented (cm/ntfunc.c:383) NtCreateKey() doesn't create trees! (found '\' in remaining path:"\DeviceClasses\{86E0D1E0-8089-11D0-9CE4-08003E301F73}\##?#ACPI#PNP0501#1#{86E0D1E0-8089-11D0-9CE4-08003E301F73}"!) KeBugCheckWithTf at ke/catch.c:222 A problem has been detected and ReactOS has been shut down to prevent damage to your computer. The problem seems to be caused by the following file: ntoskrnl.exe KMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED Technical information: *** STOP: 0x0000001E (0xc0000005,0x80039e70,0x00000000,0x00000004) *** ntoskrnl.exe - Address 0x80039e70 base at 0x80000000, DateStamp 0x0 Page Fault Exception: 14(0) Processor: 0 CS:EIP 8:80039e70 <ntoskrnl.exe:39e70 (io/device.c:86 (IopInitializeDevice))> cr2 4 cr3 34000 Proc: 80806364 Pid: 4 <System> Thrd: 80807680 Tid: 0 DS 10 ES 10 FS 30 GS 10 EAX: 00000000 EBX: 000764dc ECX: 80952008 EDX: 809b9e24 EBP: 800eeba0 ESI: 15b62000 ESP: 800eeb14 EDI: 00000000 EFLAGS: 00210296 kESP 800eeb14 kernel stack base 800ed000 Frames: <ntoskrnl.exe:4b8cf (io/pnpmgr.c:1523 (IopActionInitChildServices))> <ntoskrnl.exe:4b986 (io/pnpmgr.c:1569 (IopActionInitAllServices))> <ntoskrnl.exe:4aa6b (io/pnpmgr.c:695 (IopTraverseDeviceTreeNode))> <ntoskrnl.exe:4aaa1 (io/pnpmgr.c:709 (IopTraverseDeviceTreeNode))> <ntoskrnl.exe:4aaa1 (io/pnpmgr.c:709 (IopTraverseDeviceTreeNode))> <ntoskrnl.exe:4aae7 (io/pnpmgr.c:735 (IopTraverseDeviceTree))> <ntoskrnl.exe:4b9ec (io/pnpmgr.c:1628 (IopInitializePnpServices))> <800AB56A> <800A909C> <ntoskrnl.exe:10544 (ke/main.c:103 (KiSystemStartup))> <800A77AA> <ntoskrnl.exe:104b (D:\DOKUME~1\hb\LOKALE~1\Temp/ccO4aaaa.s:51 (_section_alignment__))>

3 6

Recent horrid slowdown
by Phillip Susi 19 May '05

19 May '05

About a week or two ago usetup took about 20 seconds on my system under qemu to copy over the installation files. I thought even that seemed a bit slow, so I started rewriting the code to use memory mapped files to see if I could speed it up. Now that I finished with it, I noticed that the current code in the repository now takes just over 90 seconds to install the files, which my changes reduce back down to 20 seconds. Does anyone have any idea about what revision this huge slowdown was introduced in? I'll try and figure out the problem tonight but it would help if someone could point me towards the vicinity of it now so I don't have to spend time looking when I get home. I'd like to get the normal code back to it's former 20 second install area so I can get a good comparison with my new code. I'd be thrilled if it then could get the install times down to 10 seconds.

3 5

Directory name problem.
by WaxDragon 19 May '05

19 May '05

Just recently, (cd "Program Files") has stopped working. It works without the quotes, but when you tab complete the directory name, it quotes it for you automatically. Anyone touch this recently? WD -- "<arty> the tree was touched a lot recently"

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Ros-dev