This way of numbering seems very confusing to me, and I assume to other
people as well..
When ReactOS presents itself as 0.5-SVN, I would expect this to be a 0.5
release, and not a 0.4 release that is working towards a 0.5.
regards,
Mark
PS: I wasn't subscribed at the time this was sent, so sending a 'fake'
reply :)
*Ged Murphy* gedmurphy.maillists at gmail.com
> <ros-dev%40reactos.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5Bros-dev%5D%20ReactOS%20SVN%20version%20naming&In-Reply-To=%3C005201d1730b%2456b98b90%24042ca2b0%24%40gmail.com%3E>
> *Mon Feb 29 16:07:49 UTC 2016*
>
> Because that’s what is being worked towards now, and there will be an
> unknown number of point releases until it’s reached.
>
> It’s also a bit of nostalgia, it’s what we’ve always done :)
>
>
>
>>
>> From: Ros-dev [mailto:ros-dev-bounces at reactos.org <http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev>] On Behalf Of Hermès
>> BÉLUSCA - MAÏTO
>> Sent: 29 February 2016 16:00
>> To: ReactOS Development List <ros-dev at reactos.org <http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev>>
>> Subject: [ros-dev] ReactOS SVN version naming
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I would like to understand what’s the rationale behind changing the ReactOS
>> trunk version from “0.4-SVN” to “0.5-SVN” (see revision 70818) whereas we
>> have just started to release ROS 0.4.0 only?
>>
>> Thanks in advance for your explanations!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Hermès.
>
>
Hello,
Let me invite you to the monthly status meeting taking place last
Thursday of a month, 31th of March, 19:00 UTC, as usual. That's tomorrow!
IRC service will only be started shortly before the meeting. Your
participation passwords and server address will be emailed to you
shortly before the meeting starts, and they are going to be different
once again as they are not stored in any database. Hopefully it's not
much of inconvenience.
Please send agenda proposals to me before the meeting. And yes, 0.4.1
release discussion is in the agenda list already, proposed by Alex Rex :-)
Regards,
Aleksey Bragin
Hi all,
After the plugs at our old hosting site have finally been pulled
yesterday, I managed to save all the important data and bring up a new
server. The following services are up again, even if their performance
might not match the old one:
* Build GCCLin_x86
* Build GCCLin_x86 Release
* Test KVM
* iso.reactos.org
In a short timeframe, I may be able to revive the Windows 7 builder as
well as Doxygen and download.reactos.org. Needs some evaluation as to
whether the resources of the server manage that.
Approximately around May or June, we can add some of our previous
servers to the server farm again. All services should be back up by
then, with the same or even improved performance.
Cheers,
Colin
Hello,
unfortunately I can't attend this meeting because of another official
appointment. Nevertheless I would like to offer support the GSoC student as
contact or mentor of necessary. Rama already contacted me and I reviewed his
proposal last week. As long as it is on the optional list of projects I deem
necessary to mention this.
Regards,
Matthias
Am Wednesday 30 March 2016 20:15:08 schrieb Aleksey Bragin:
> Hello,
> Let me invite you to the monthly status meeting taking place last
> Thursday of a month, 31th of March, 19:00 UTC, as usual. That's tomorrow!
>
> IRC service will only be started shortly before the meeting. Your
> participation passwords and server address will be emailed to you
> shortly before the meeting starts, and they are going to be different
> once again as they are not stored in any database. Hopefully it's not
> much of inconvenience.
>
> Please send agenda proposals to me before the meeting. And yes, 0.4.1
> release discussion is in the agenda list already, proposed by Alex Rex :-)
>
> Regards,
> Aleksey Bragin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
--
Matthias Kupfer phone +49 371 236 46 52
Wilhelm-Firl-Straße 21 mobile +49 160 859 43 54
09122 Chemnitz, Germany