"Continue doing as it does now, keep the NT5.2 target, stabilize the existing components, and develop the remaining components, all within the limitations of NT5, or"

let´s try to get this to a stable stage, then we will think about NT6+

On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrDiettrich1@aol.com> wrote:

Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo schrieb:

And, ROS is not complete yet. Isnt it more reliable to try to get it stable for NT5, then shitch to NT6?

If we change now, we are leaving things undone.... and we will leave them again when switching to NT7, and so.....

+1

I'd like to see a modular system, that can be configured for whatever compatibility - as far as possible. I could imagine a modular OO approach, with virtual methods where needed, with lack of performance being compensated by progress in hardware.

DoDi

_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev