On 5/22/06, Mike Swanson <mikeonthecomputer@gmail.com> wrote:
On Monday 22 May 2006 10:52, David Johnson wrote:
> I like #2.
>
> On 5/22/06, mf <mf@mufunyo.net> wrote:
> > WaxDragon wrote:
> > > I have the UIC's approval.
> >
> > I never approved it to be non-user-selectable in the first place.
> >
> > IRC log (18 Apr 2006):
> > 22:27 -!- Irssi: Starting query in FreeNode with Christoph_vW
> > 22:27 <Christoph_vW>
http://www.ApiViewer.de/downloads/test.png
[snip]
> > 23:02 <Christoph_vW> http://www.ApiViewer.de/downloads/test2.png
No complaints from me, I like the first one best; a plain Windows 2000 copy
was pretty boring. But yes, it should be user-selectable. How about a window
manager as flexible as all the Unix ones (fvwm, kwin, etc)? Just make it easy
for people that aren't going to tweak it so much! :)
Hmm, maybe even something compatible with Windows XP themes would be good to have, at least eventually. Then existing ones that have been made could be used. Of course, that could be just part of some window manager, maybe.
