Oh I should have clicked the link, I just noticed that code uses
MS-LPL 1.1, which is worded differently.
The new wording is:
"(F) Platform Limitation - The licenses granted in sections 2(A) and
2(B) extend only to the software or derivative works that you create
that run directly on a Microsoft Windows operating system product,
Microsoft run-time technology (such as the .NET Framework or
Silverlight), or Microsoft application platform (such as Microsoft
Office or Microsoft Dynamics)."
This is a lot more ambiguous, whether or not the new word "directly"
changes things. I think it doesn't, but it would require a more
lawyer-y mind to figure out.
On 29 November 2013 17:35, David Quintana (gigaherz) <gigaherz(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The exact words of the license, as seen at
http://www.ohloh.net/licenses/mslpl (I couldn't find a better link for
it), are:
"4. (F) Platform Limitation- The licenses granted in sections 2(A) &
2(B) extend only to the software or derivative works that you create
that run on a Microsoft Windows operating system product."
Excluding that term, the rest of the license is mostly a
differently-worded BSD license. If it only needs to be tested in
windows to ensure that it works there, then there should be absolutely
no problem including it in ReactOS, as long as the terms don't
conflict with the other licenses' terms. And GPL with the ReactOS
exception, as far as I can tell, allows it. I'm not a lawyer, though,
so I could be wrong.
On 29 November 2013 16:17, Alexander Andrejevic
<theflash(a)sdf.lonestar.org> wrote:
> Hi Ged,
>
> Are you sure that we can use software released under the MS-LPL? It has a rather
weird
> limitation in section 4, which says that you can only use it on a "Microsoft
Windows operating system product".
> Since ReactOS is not Windows, that would mean we can't use it.
> Please correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> Regards,
> Alexander
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 02:58:51PM -0000, Ged Murphy wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> I know this has been discussed before, but should we not just bite the bullet and
replace this driver with the Microsoft driver.
>> The MS_LPL license allows it to be used in reactos, and it would certainly get
rid of any unknowns and give us a reliable filesystem to work from.
>>
>>
http://code.msdn.microsoft.com/windowshardware/fastfat-File-System-Driver-1…
>>
>> Ged.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ros-diffs-bounces(a)reactos.org [mailto:ros-diffs-bounces@reactos.org] On
Behalf Of ekohl(a)svn.reactos.org
>> Sent: 29 November 2013 14:06
>> To: ros-diffs(a)reactos.org
>> Subject: [ros-diffs] [ekohl] 61145: [FASTFAT] FsdGetFsVolumeInformation: Return
volume creation time.
>>
>> Author: ekohl
>> Date: Fri Nov 29 14:05:43 2013
>> New Revision: 61145
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>>
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
> --
> Alexander Andrejevic <theflash(a)sdf.lonestar.org>
> SDF Public Access UNIX System -
http://sdf.lonestar.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev