27 Feb
2012
27 Feb
'12
2:58 p.m.
well, i think thats being done, in some way. Lets see:
"alpha channel" may be the regular daily builds, which can be totally
broken, completely unstable... or not. "use them at your own risk" (tm)
"beta channel" are releases done right after branching (with the -RC tag)
and "stable releases", considering those are not actually stables, are the
so-called 0.3.13, 0.3.14, 0.3.12, 0.3.10.... and so
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Emanuel Rietveld <codehotter(a)gmail.com>wrote;wrote:
What do you think about developing multiple channels simultaneously? After
2 months, release alpha, after 2 months, release beta, after another 2
months, released. That way, new features appear 'on the radar' every 2
months, but they don't need to be completely polished for 6 months. Users
would expect Beta to be generally usable, even if there are some bugs or
regressions, and you'd do your best to keep Alpha usable, but don't
guarantee anything.
Emanuel
______________________________**_________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/**mailman/listinfo/ros-dev<http://www.reactos.org…