4th scenario - App is actually "buggy" and doesnt check for any export.
We´re fucked up :P
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Love Nystrom <love.nystrom(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
  Correct me if I'm wrong (Alex?), but isn't the
biggest difference
 between kernel 5.2 and 6.x that 6.x is *paging the kernel* ?
 (A huge design mistake if you ask me. One I bet will bite MS on the a**.
 If the kernel gets too fat it needs liposuction, not paging.)
 IMHO, adding new APIs, while keeping the (non-paging) kernel seems ideal.
 Best Regards
 // Neo
 On 2016-05-19 05.43, ros-dev-request(a)reactos.org wrote:
 Subject:
 Re: [ros-dev] Pale Moon drops ReactOS support
 From:
 Alex Ionescu <ionucu(a)videotron.ca> <ionucu(a)videotron.ca>
 Date:
 2016-05-19 02.33
 To:
 ReactOS Development List <ros-dev(a)reactos.org> <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
 I don't believe I said 'let's add random exports to our DLLs'. In
 fact, in your old thread, I was totally FOR your idea, I even wrote
 that the only sane way of doing it is with the app compat work.
 On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Timo Kreuzer <timo.kreuzer(a)web.de>
<timo.kreuzer(a)web.de> wrote:
  We have been discussing this before and I wonder
that Alex is not heavily> opposing the idea of randomly adding new exports to our user
mode DLLs. It> is a well known fact that applications check for existance of exports
to> decide how to behave, so ... not going to go over this again.>> To addess
this issue I suggested to implement a compatibility layer. And> there was a detailed
discussion about that on this mailing list.>
https://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/2015-March/017216.html>> Please take your
time to read the whole thread again so we can avoid wasting> time, talking about the
same things again.>> Timo 
 --
 There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world,
 and that's an idea whose time has come. [Victor Hugo]
 _______________________________________________
 Ros-dev mailing list
 Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
 
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev