4th scenario - App is actually "buggy" and doesnt check for any export.
We´re fucked up :P
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Love Nystrom <love.nystrom(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong (Alex?), but isn't the
biggest difference
between kernel 5.2 and 6.x that 6.x is *paging the kernel* ?
(A huge design mistake if you ask me. One I bet will bite MS on the a**.
If the kernel gets too fat it needs liposuction, not paging.)
IMHO, adding new APIs, while keeping the (non-paging) kernel seems ideal.
Best Regards
// Neo
On 2016-05-19 05.43, ros-dev-request(a)reactos.org wrote:
Subject:
Re: [ros-dev] Pale Moon drops ReactOS support
From:
Alex Ionescu <ionucu(a)videotron.ca> <ionucu(a)videotron.ca>
Date:
2016-05-19 02.33
To:
ReactOS Development List <ros-dev(a)reactos.org> <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
I don't believe I said 'let's add random exports to our DLLs'. In
fact, in your old thread, I was totally FOR your idea, I even wrote
that the only sane way of doing it is with the app compat work.
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Timo Kreuzer <timo.kreuzer(a)web.de>
<timo.kreuzer(a)web.de> wrote:
We have been discussing this before and I wonder
that Alex is not heavily> opposing the idea of randomly adding new exports to our user
mode DLLs. It> is a well known fact that applications check for existance of exports
to> decide how to behave, so ... not going to go over this again.>> To addess
this issue I suggested to implement a compatibility layer. And> there was a detailed
discussion about that on this mailing list.>
https://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/2015-March/017216.html>> Please take your
time to read the whole thread again so we can avoid wasting> time, talking about the
same things again.>> Timo
--
There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world,
and that's an idea whose time has come. [Victor Hugo]
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev