Re: [ros-dev] KeBugCheck

[Alex Ionescu]

James Tabor wrote:

>   WOOOO!
>  Thomas Weidenmueller wrote:
>
> >   Mike Nordell wrote:
> >
> > >   Hartmut Birr wrote:
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > >  If not, it's simply impossible to get correct and intended 
> > >  functionality,
> > >  should preemtion occur.
> > >   
> > >  
> >  I very much doubt the irql should change at all...
> >
> >  Best Regards,
> >  Thomas 
>
>  It did not click in my pee brain, "Preemption"? How could it preempt 
>  inside
>  kernel space? I thought atm that was imposable. 
Yeah, we don't really preempt on UP as far as I know with the current 
scheduler. I think this only happens on MP, and I agree that the IRQL 
probably doesn't get restored properly. Hopefully it'll work fine in my 
scheduler...I had a similar problem but I found the bug and fixed it.

Best regards,
Alex Ionescu