it only support FAT16 not long file name. I did talk with him one week back and told him we are not instred in his boot loaders
----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Palmer" brianp@sginet.com To: "'ReactOS Development List'" ros-dev@reactos.org Sent: den 25 February 2006 19:50 Subject: RE: [ros-dev] Re: [ros-bugs] [Bug 390] Freeloader Execption:DIVIDEBYZERO
Hi Jerry,
Would you mind sending it to me? I would like to see it.
-Brian
-----Original Message----- From: ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] On Behalf Of Jerry Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2006 9:25 AM To: ReactOS Development List Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Re: [ros-bugs] [Bug 390] Freeloader Execption: DIVIDEBYZERO
My bootsector fits in one 512 byte block and takes in account of file fragmentation.
Ged Murphy wrote:
Jerry wrote:
My bootsector is clean, and it is /highly/ derived from the *FreeDOS* bootsector (GPL). If you take the FreeDOS bootsector and mine and look at them side by side you will find some striking similarities. I have complied with the GPL and put the derivative work under the GPL too. I haven't been able to get a dev to look at it yet. If any who fall in that category want to, I'll send it to you.
What Brian is saying is, if we already have a perfectly good boot sector, what is the point in replacing it? Brians FreeLoader has been tried and tested and it should be kept.
Ged.
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev