Hartmut Birr wrote:
Hi,
I don't agree completely with our legal policy. In my opinion, it is
allowed to use reverse-engineering to find out interfaces or something
like this. It isn't allowed to disassemble windows to study how the fast
call entry works or to find out how the APC code is implemented. There
exist some paper on the web. It is allowed to use the nice paper from
David P. Probert (Windows Kernel Development). It isn't allowed to use
the code from the dude called CrazyLord (Reverse Engineer).
This isn't quite fair, unfortunately. We've gone a long time without an
explicit policy regarding this subject, mostly because we were all in
agreement. You can't boot someone out because they violated a rule that
wasn't made clear to them. OTOH, if our position is clearly stated and
is violated then I agree - begone with them.