Re: [ros-dev] Re: [ros-svn] [hbirr] 15818: Allocate the section object from non paged pool because the storage for a spin lock must be in non paged memory.

[Hartmut Birr]

Alex Ionescu wrote:
> [e-mail] wrote:
> > Allocate the section object from non paged pool because the storage
> > for a spin lock must be in non paged memory.
>
> Hi,
>
> Not that I disagree with your changes (it seems they are necessary)
> but don't they imply a bigger architectural problem? I've checked with
> WinOBJ and the Section Object is allocated in paged memory... just
> wanted to let you know this is why I made the change.
>
> Best regards,
> Alex Ionescu

I'm not sure what WinObj means with the paged and non paged memory. I
see sections with both values set to zero and sections which using paged
and non paged memory.

- Hartmut