Re: [ros-dev] cursoricon.c

oripipa wrote:

>  IS this correct? interpreting a shared cursos should
> never be  
destroyed?

No. But then shared resources are not yet implemented (at least wasn't 
last I checked) why this code wasn't too incorrect. Your change most 
certainly is not right, as it'd make the code never remove anything 
from the list.

Current code removes the process-owned icons (from the list) when the 
process terminates. Is this case really properly locked? I don't know.

More research is needed for shared resources.

-- 
Mike