Re: [ros-dev] Replacing unsafe TRUE comparisons (Following Re: bool => BOOL)

[Love Nystrom]

On 2014-11-21 04.00, Timo Kreuzer wrote:
>   Am 20.11.2014 14:18, schrieb Love Nystrom:
> >  
> >  Well... Actually not exactly the same.. ;)
> >  "if (f != FALSE)" requires an explicit comparison with a second operand, 
> No, it does not. It requries the compiler to generate code that 
>  executes the following statement, when f is not 0.  
I suspect we look at it from two different viewpoints here..
Yours is "C centric" and mine is "object code centric".
You talk about what the compiler is required to do,
and I talk about what comes out at the end of compilation.

And.. dear friend.. don't turn this into a pissing contest.
Let's check the egos in with the coat check girl at the entrance.
May I ask how old you are?

Best Regards
// Love