Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [jgardou] 64127: [KDGDB] - Add a callback mechanism permitting to "simulate" KD send <-> receive loop without having to actually communicate to GDB - Use that to update the program counter when con...

[Timo Kreuzer]

while(1); is not really a good solution. It should be something that is
visible in GDB.
But I fear that a KeBugCheck() won't work here, since it will rely on a
working KD connection.
Maybe a KD_ASSERT() macro, that calls KdAssert() on failure or
something, resets the GDB connection somehow, issues a debug print and
then halts.


Am 12.09.2014 22:23, schrieb jgardou(a)svn.reactos.org:
>   Author: jgardou
>  Date: Fri Sep 12 20:23:08 2014
>  New Revision: 64127
>
>  URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=64127&view=rev
>  Log:
>  [KDGDB]
>   - Add a callback mechanism permitting to "simulate" KD send <-> receive
> loop without having to actually communicate to GDB
>   - Use that to update the program counter when cont'ing a breakpoint
>  Now cont'ing an assertion failure is possible, since we actually get beyond the int 3
> instruction
>
>  Modified:
>      trunk/reactos/drivers/base/kdgdb/gdb_input.c
>      trunk/reactos/drivers/base/kdgdb/kdgdb.h
>      trunk/reactos/drivers/base/kdgdb/kdpacket.c
>
>  +)
>  +{
>  +    DBGKD_MANIPULATE_STATE64* State =
> (DBGKD_MANIPULATE_STATE64*)MessageHeader->Buffer;
>  +
>  +    /* We just confirm that all went well */
>  +    if ((PacketType != PACKET_TYPE_KD_STATE_MANIPULATE)
>  +            || (State->ApiNumber != DbgKdSetContextApi)
>  +            || (State->ReturnStatus != STATUS_SUCCESS))
>  +    {
>  +        /* Should we bugcheck ? */
>  +        while (1);
>  +    }
>  +}
>  +
>  +static
>  +KDSTATUS
>  +SetContext(
>  +    _Out_ DBGKD_MANIPULATE_STATE64* State,
>  +    _Out_ PSTRING MessageData,
>  +    _Out_ PULONG MessageLength,
>  +    _Inout_ PKD_CONTEXT KdContext,
>  +    _In_opt_ KDP_MANIPULATESTATE_HANDLER ManipulateStateHandler
>  +)
>  +{
>  +    State->ApiNumber = DbgKdSetContextApi;
>  +    State->Processor = CurrentStateChange.Processor;
>  +    State->ReturnStatus = STATUS_SUCCESS;
>  +    State->ProcessorLevel = CurrentStateChange.ProcessorLevel;
>  +    MessageData->Length = sizeof(CurrentContext);
>  +
>  +    if (MessageData->MaximumLength < sizeof(CurrentContext))
>  +    {
>  +        while (1);
>  +    }
>  +
>