I use the codeblocks backend. Dev-C++ one can die a quick and painful death.

On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Ged Murphy <gedmurphy@gmail.com> wrote:

I’d imagine a lot of larger corporations still use 2005 as their development environments are more tightly controlled.

I didn’t want to alienate these users.

 

Anyway, everything below msvc8 is now falling foul to my delete key.

I’m going to do the same with the entire codeblocks and devcpp backends.

Speak now or forever hold your peace.

 

 

From: ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.org] On Behalf Of Zachary Gorden
Sent: 02 December 2009 15:23
To: ReactOS Development List
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] rbuild msvc backend

 

Any reason to still keep 2005?

On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Ged Murphy <gedmurphy@gmail.com> wrote:

I’ve gone down the path of virtually rewriting the msvc backend for rbuild. Our current implementation had completely outgrown its original design and was becoming very difficult to manage, as highlighted when I was adding support for VS 2010.

 

Anyway, whilst I’m doing this I think it’s a good time assess what we want to support. We currently support Visual Studio 6, Visual Studio .NET 2002 and Visual Studio.NET 2003. This is a waste of time IMO and only adds to the complexity of the module

I’m proposing to remove support for these 3 products unless anyone has any reasons against.

 

Ged.

 


_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev

 


_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev