Re: [ros-dev] A call for 0.2.8

[WaxDragon]

In retrospect, I think 18402 would be better, Gunnar's malloc changes
are turning up little bugs, and I'm not sure we want to hunt down all
of those for the release.

On 10/11/05, WaxDragon [e-mail] wrote:
> On 10/11/05, Casper Hornstrup [e-mail] wrote:
> > You can always branch back in time. Subversion is a time machine ;-)
> >
> > Casper
>
> Yup.  I propose 18406 as the branch point.  Do we need to hunt down
> RobertK or is the release process documented anywhere?
> WD
>
> <arty> don't question it ... it's clearly an optimization

--
<arty> don't question it ... it's clearly an optimization