12 Oct
2005
12 Oct
'05
1:57 p.m.
In retrospect, I think 18402 would be better, Gunnar's malloc changes
are turning up little bugs, and I'm not sure we want to hunt down all
of those for the release.
On 10/11/05, WaxDragon <waxdragon(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/11/05, Casper Hornstrup
<ch(a)csh-consult.dk> wrote:
--
<arty> don't question it ... it's clearly an optimization
You can always branch back in time. Subversion is
a time machine ;-)
Casper
Yup. I propose 18406 as the branch point. Do we need to hunt down
RobertK or is the release process documented anywhere?
WD
--
<arty> don't question it ... it's clearly an optimization