You can create physical apartuses (aparatii?) that demonstrate the existence of pseudo-forces, so they do "exist". The term "pseudo" doesn't mean "non-existent".
Hell, go up a building and drop a heavy object in a perfect straight line. It'll land a bit east because of circular motion forces that are "pseudo".
On 15-Jul-09, at 5:22 PM, Alex wrote:
Hello Timo,
Thursday, July 16, 2009, 4:09:30 AM, you wrote:
[01:12] care2debug: Physicus: do you have a physics degree? I wonder how one can make such blunders who is not in the 7th grade :)
Oops, that didn't sound very well, I agree, even if it was not meant as a serious remark (see the smile). Heat of the discussion, I suppose.
For that I apologize.
But I still don't think banning was an appropriate solution. You could ignore me, you could tell me to STFU, anything.
The ban was to make you think about your behaviour. Please learn the stuff (there is a centrifugal force, it is only existant in the rotating reference system and not in an inertial system and it's a pseudo- force, but that doesn't make it non-existant, learn about what a force is at all) and learn to be less of a smartass. Your ban has already been removed
I see that you agree that this is a pseudo-force. But since this list is not related to physics I will not continue this discussion here.
-- Best regards, Alex mailto:care2debug@gmail.com
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Best regards, Alex Ionescu