Re: [ros-dev] Re : MmSecureVirtualMemory

[Alex Ionescu]

This function is broken by design and nobody should be using it because it doesn't
guarantee anything.

Therefore this function saying "ok!!!" is about as useful as it actually doing
anything.

On 2010-01-02, at 7:20 AM, Sylvain Petreolle wrote:

>   Faking success for this kind of function can lead to
> great race conditions,
>  according to its documentation...
>  Is this ok to have a "it mysteriously (doesn't) work" state ?
>   
>  Kind regards,
>  Sylvain Petreolle
>  
>  
>  De : Alex Ionescu <ionucu(a)videotron.ca>
>  À : ReactOS Development List <ros-dev(a)reactos.org>
>  Envoyé le : Sam 2 Janvier 2010, 3 h 08 min 15 s
>  Objet : Re: [ros-dev] MmSecureVirtualMemory
>  
>  It's already been fixed.
>  
>  On 2010-01-01, at 8:02 PM, Olaf Siejka wrote:
>  
> >   Could anyone please consider implementing the
> > above? According to http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms802934.aspx -
> > MmUnsecureVirtualMemory could be required as well.
> >  
> >  Lack of those functions is currently breaking up 3d acceleration passthrough with
> > Virtualbox 3.1.0 and newer.
> >  
> >  Thanks in advance
> >  _______________________________________________
> >  Ros-dev mailing list
> >  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> >  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev 
>  
>  Best regards,
>  Alex Ionescu
>  
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev 
Best regards,
Alex Ionescu