Re: [ros-dev] Re: [ros-svn] [ekohl] 16283: Don't redefine ANSI_STRING, UNICODE_STRING and OBJECT_ATTRIBUTES if the NDK already defines them.

[Alex Ionescu]

Eric Kohl wrote:
>   Alex Ionescu wrote:
> >   Hi Eric,
> >  Unforunately, we don't have the liberty to do this, since the real
> >  PSDK file doesn't, and MS Header compatibility is a goal. The NDK
> >  must always follow ntsecapi.h.
> >  Best regards,
> >  Alex Ionescu 
>  Okay, I'll revert this patch!
>  Nevertheless, the required sequence of includes
>      #include <windows.h>
>      #include <ntsecapi.h>
>      #define NTOS_MODE_USER
>      #include <ntndk/ntndk.h>
>  looks very broken to me. Shouldn't the DDK/NDK headers get included
>  first, followed by windows.h and other headers? 
Well, DDK should never be followed or anywhere near windows.h! And NDK
is an add-on to the DDK/PSDK, so it's normal that it follows. The point
is to "Add-on" anything that isn't already provided, so a typical
sequence would look like:
#include <windows.h>
#include <winsock2.h>
#include <ntsecapi.h>
#include <any other header you want"
#define NTOS_MODE_USER
#include <ntndk/ntndk.h>
>  The MS DDK defines NT_INCLUDED right at the top of ntddk.h and the SDK
>  headers skip certain sections if NT_INCLUDED is defined. Shouldn't we
>  do it the same way? At least it will lead to a 'cleaner' include
>  sequence:
>      #define NTOS_MODE_USER
>      #include <ntndk/ntndk.h>
>       #include <windows.h>
>      #include <ntsecapi.h>
>  
This would mean the NDK would have to import windows.h, which I don't
like, because some apps don't need to use windows.h (think Native Apps).
I prefer to think of the NDK much more as an add-on, then a master
header set.
>  By the way, I planned to remove the Nt*Channel() and
>  NtQueryOleDirectryFile() prototypes from include/ndk/zwfuncs.h because
>  they are entirely obsolete. Do you agree? 
Oh, yes, sure. Thanks.
OT: You'll finally get that proper Parse Routine for registry code soon.
>  Regards,
>  Eric  
Best regards,
Alex Ionescu