3 Jan
2005
3 Jan
'05
6:22 p.m.
Alex Ionescu wrote:
Apoligies accepted.
This, once again, suggests to add detailed comments to code changes when
committing, or fixing a commit one assumes is wrong. I, first of all,
had to say I had changed the type of LpcPortObjectType because of the
w32api header and the fact that DATA symbols are pointers. When I saw
the excerpts from the DDK headers posted by Filip, I realized I was
fooled by a wrong definition. I should have checked that first! I assume
these two definitions *are* different, aren't they?
extern POBJECT_TYPE *IoFileObjectType; /* <- Official DDK headers */
extern NTOSAPI POBJECT_TYPE IoFileObjectType; /* <- W32API headers */
Alex, you say, in another reply, we will build soon ros using the w32api
headers. If so, should this be fixed?
Emanuele Aliberti