mf wrote:
Nobody (ok, many didn't) objected to attacking Iraq at first either. Nor did they to the beginnings of the Holocaust.
Best regards, Alex Ionescu
Whatever. I've had it having to justify my every breath in here. I'm stepping down as UIC and icon designer. Fireball, you can close my SVN account. It seems some people are thinking we didn't lose enough developers from the Hartmut drama. I am officially fed up with everyone's fucking around and bitching. The person I expected it from the least is GreatLord.
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.org http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Take it easy, I was trying to tone down the melodrama with some random off-topic posts.
I don't want to be Kernel Coordinator and oversee all patches, I don't think we should have Kernel flame wars, and I don't think this has anything to do with Iraq or Nazism, I was just hoping we could move away from the argument (which I don't even understand, since I have no idea what Greatlord is talking about or which logo he wants reverted, since they've already been changed and reverted multiple times that it got confusing for everyone).
However, to add my two cents, either you start respecting coordinator positions or you don't. Some of you come up with arguments like "oh noes!! We CAN'T change this in Application FOO because <some guy that wrote foo> doesn't want us to!". Well, if your definition of GPL/FOSS is that some guy can dictate how his code is used, then shouldn't your definition of a "coordinator" be someont that dictates policy on his area?
If it's OK to take Foo's authority over foo.exe as supreme, isn't it a bit hypocritical to go behind Bar KC's authority when modifying bar?
Just my two cents.
Best regards, alex Ionescu