Re: [ros-dev] RE: [ros-diffs] [mflyer] 21918: Sorry Ged, but that's not the Rea ctOS logo.

[Alex Ionescu]

mf wrote:
> >   Nobody (ok,
> > many didn't) objected to attacking Iraq at first either.
> >  Nor did they to the beginnings of the Holocaust.
> >
> >  Best regards,
> >  Alex Ionescu 
>  
>  
>  Whatever. I've had it having to justify my every breath in here. I'm
>  stepping down as UIC and icon designer.
>  Fireball, you can close my SVN account. It seems some people are
>  thinking we didn't lose enough developers from the Hartmut drama. I am
>  officially fed up with everyone's fucking around and bitching. The
>  person I expected it from the least is GreatLord.
>  
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>   
Take it easy, I was trying to tone down the melodrama with some random
off-topic posts.

I don't want to be Kernel Coordinator and oversee all patches, I don't
think we should have Kernel flame wars, and I don't think this has
anything to do with Iraq or Nazism, I was just hoping we could move away
from the argument (which I don't even understand, since I have no idea
what Greatlord is talking about or which logo he wants reverted, since
they've already been changed and reverted multiple times that it got
confusing for everyone).

However, to add my two cents, either you start respecting coordinator
positions or you don't. Some of you come up with arguments like "oh
noes!! We CAN'T change this in Application FOO because <some guy that
wrote foo> doesn't want us to!". Well, if your definition of GPL/FOSS is
that some guy can dictate how his code is used, then shouldn't your
definition of a "coordinator" be someont that dictates policy on his area?

If it's OK to take Foo's authority over foo.exe as supreme, isn't it a
bit hypocritical to go behind Bar KC's authority when modifying bar?

Just my two cents.

Best regards,
alex Ionescu