just 1 more thing...

if you choose to download modules optionally, please dont forget about users behind a proxy which requires authentication.... (im one of them at work :) )

On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Alex Ionescu <ionucu@videotron.ca> wrote:
Since online installers use HTTP, and the user got the installer off HTTP, what would a proxy server change?

--
Best regards,
Alex Ionescu

On 2011-06-03, at 12:33 PM, Kamil Hornicek wrote:

> I didn't want to spam this discussion but I have to.. What every other software company also does is refusing to believe someone might be behind a proxy server. If you go this way, please make sure the installer doesn't need a direct connection. Also online installers are generally a major pain in the ass if you don't provide an offline installer too.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: Alex Ionescu
> To: ReactOS Development List
> Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 5:56 PM
> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] 1294 [dreimer] Fix clean for cmake trees. ...
>
>
> Why separate installers for x64/ARM?
>
>
> Just do what every software company this side of the century does: a 400kb installer which lets you select the packages you want, and downloads them.
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Alex Ionescu
>
>
> On 2011-06-03, at 11:38 AM, Zachary Gorden wrote:
>
>
> Spoke with Amine and Daniel.  I've agreed to the lesser evil of bundling the FULL cmake.  Reasons are if we want the BE to be flexible enough to be used for more than just building ROS, we can't gimp cmake with the belief that no one will need the things we didn't include.  This is again on Windows.  I remain uninvolved with decisions about the Linux BE.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Colin Finck <colin@reactos.org> wrote:
>
> Timo Kreuzer <timo.kreuzer@web.de> wrote:
>
> My vote on this:
> CMake: bundle it, optional on installation
> x64/arm: create individual installers
>
>
>
> * CMake: bundle it, go for the (minimal) version without an installer. It's nothing "exotic" to install after all, just put it together with the other utilities in RosBE.
>
> * x64/arm: If build tool sizes are staying like this, create individual installers. Just for testing, I'll try an x86/x64 multilib build of Binutils and GCC though, would be nice to know how much smaller it is compared to separate x86 and x64 compilers.
>
> So in general, I agree with Timo :-)
>
>
> - Colin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev@reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev@reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev@reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev@reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev


_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev@reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev