Re: [ros-dev] Vote: code auditing

[Martin Fuchs]

2006/2/17, Ged Murphy <gedmurphy(a)gmail.com>om>:
>   Ged Murphy wrote: 
[...]
>   Not only must we been seen to be pro-active with the
> audit for the
>  general public to see (e.g. osnews, slashdot), but we must also ensure
>  we do not alienate developers who feel _very_ strongly about the
>  un-audited code. By reopening the repository, with the addition of
>  locking un-audited code, I think we can strike a fair compromise for all
>  parties, and ensure the audit takes place. 
Don't forget to make up clear rules how the audit should take place,
and which rules have to be obied. It's not easy to decide whether a
particular function clean or not as explained by Ge a few days ago...

    Martin