Re: [ros-dev] Usage of RtlAllocateHeap

[Thomas Weidenmueller]

M Bealby wrote:
>   However, after submitting bugs #1102 and #1103 (now
> fixed by
>  BrandonTurner) it became apparent that incorrect usage of the
>  RtlAllocateHeap function (and its alias HeapAlloc) is quite common. It
>  may return NULL if memory cannot be allocated and in some parts of the
>  code this is not checked. This would lead to a segmentation fault on
>  reading / writing. 
If it was only the incorrect usage of RtlAllocateHeap, missing checks
are all over the place and I wish at least all of our permanent
developers would take care of at least the most common ones that could
lead to crashes in case of failure. Admittedly sometimes people seem to
be lazy and don't care about possible failures, but it's annoying to see
such code going in on an almost daily basis.

- Thomas