Most of ReactOS is licensed under the GPL. The parts we share with Wine are LGPL.
Gé van Geldorp.
-----Original Message----- From: ros-dev-bounces@reactos.com [mailto:ros-dev-bounces@reactos.com] On Behalf Of Sylvain Petreolle Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 21:44 To: ros-dev@reactos.com Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Vote: Allow 3rd-party distribution of ROS throughXDCCBot.
Feel free to reread LGPL 2.1 here : http://svn.reactos.com/viewcvs/trunk/reactos/LGPL.txt
--- Magnus Olsen magnus@itkonsult-olsen.com wrote:
ReactOS are not a LPGL but GPL it is big diffrent in the licen type
----- Original Message ----- From: "Sylvain Petreolle" spetreolle@yahoo.fr To: "ReactOS Development List" ros-dev@reactos.com Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 8:39 PM Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Vote: Allow 3rd-party distribution
of ROS through
XDCCBot.
If all legal conditions are fulfilled :
- give link to the source
- (alex's idea) provide md5sum of the file(s)
As some people already said, 3d point cant exist. (ros is a LGPL system, some magazines already distribute it, etc.)
[ ] Yes, allow 3rd-party distribution of the OS through the #ros-xdcc channel and ROS-XDCC-001 bot. (support and encourage this distribution)
[X] Yes, allow 3rd-party distribution of the OS, but it must clearly distance itself from officially supported releases (tolerate but do not support this distribution)
[ ] No, only sourceforge and other official ReactOS
distribution
points should be used.
Kind regards,
Usurp (aka Sylvain Petreolle)
humans are like computers, yesterday the BIOS was all
- today its just a word
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.com
http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
Kind regards,
Usurp (aka Sylvain Petreolle)
humans are like computers, yesterday the BIOS was all
- today its just a word
Ros-dev mailing list Ros-dev@reactos.com http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev