Re: [ros-dev] Vote: code auditing

[Ged Murphy]

Brandon Turner wrote:
>  
>  "The lock will be removed only when that section of code has been 
>  audited."
>  Does this mean any part of the code during the audit found to be dirty 
>  need to be rewritten before it is unlocked?  And if so, how long 
>  before you think the kernel will be unlocked? 
Well it's all up for discussion, but that is the original proposal.
As for how long before the kernel is unlock, well I suppose that'll 
depend on 2 things:
-  How much of the kernel is actually locked (it hasn't been decided 
what constitutes dirty. e.g. GreatLord proposes only assembly)
-  How quickly people rewrite the 'dirty' code