Re: [ros-dev] GCC 4.4.x -- What's missing?

[Alex Ionescu]

Forcing people to use a new RosBE is a *good* thing.

On 2009-12-31, at 12:15 AM, Daniel Reimer wrote:

>   Good question. I wonder, too. Problem could be that
> this patch forces 
>  ppl to use a new RosBE. At least last time i tried, it broke gcc 4.1.X 
>  build.
>  
>  Alex Ionescu schrieb:
> >   Hi,
> >  
> >  As far as I am aware, GCC 4.4.x now works on Linux through RosBE 1.5 (minus some missing
> > patches for 64-bit hosts), and I've gotten it to work on SnowLeopard with some minor
> > hacks -- ie, all that's missing is for Colin, when he has time, to integrate the
> > little fixes for these non-standard hosts.
> >  
> >  As for Windows, I think there is a fully working binary GCC 4.4.x/RosBE that builds trunk
> > just fine.
> >  
> >  So what's missing for 4.4.x to become official, RosBE 1.5 to RTM, and for the 4.4.x
> > patch from BZ to be committed (The one that gets trunk building)?
> >  
> >  Best regards,
> >  Alex Ionescu
> >  
> >  
> >  _______________________________________________
> >  Ros-dev mailing list
> >  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
> >  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> >  
> >   
>  
>  
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev 
Best regards,
Alex Ionescu