This would be needed when we have a minimally usable OS, and creating
branches *before* that happens doesn't make sense. Otherwise
maintaing efforts are going to eat needed manpower.
On Apr 16, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo wrote:
what about having 2 branches (at least)?
the "stable" one and the "unstable" one...
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Olaf Siejka <caemyr(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Usefull indeed, though we should be more strict on what goes into
the trunk. The more code goes there, the longer build takes, also
there is a bigger chance to break trunk with other changes. This is
why we should isolate trunk/apps/tests from other things, then tidy
it up and reorganize it. All code like the one in question could be
placed there.
Best regards
2010/4/16 James Tabor <jimtabor.rosdev(a)gmail.com>
All contributions are welcome regardless when it comes from those that
break stuff. I do not see anyone else sticking their neck out on the
block!
If you are not breaking anything you are not working!!!!!
So to those that bitch the most, when did you break anything?
Locking shit down all the time is not helping anyone!
Instead of writing this, I should be working on ReactOS, So please let
me know when I can start working again, motivate me, I do not get paid
for this, what is my motivation?
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
_______________________________________________
Ros-dev mailing list
Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev