If i may say anything, I dont think its a good idea to force NET 3.5 dependency. It`ll reduce the software usability range as not everyone is willing to upgrade from NET 2.0
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 11:11:16 +0100 From: "gedmurphy" gedmurphy@gmail.com Subject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [gschneider] 36737: RosDbg Part 3/3: - Named pipe implementation based on .net namespace IO.Pipes with support of threads - Previous win32 test version would strip random characters from debug messages and crash on entering kdbg (related t To: ros-dev@reactos.org Message-ID: 001901c92d1c$083d7770$18b86650$@com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I'd originally refrained from doing it this way, using pinvoke instead to keep .net 2.0 compatibility. Using classes such as NamedPipeServerStream forces a .net 3.5 dependency. Is this ok with everyone?
Ged.