What was wrong with a previous naming convention?
x0gone.c were supposed to contain implementation of functions, which
became legacy in that major version of NDIS. Now you substituted it
with x0stubs.c, which means it's going to contain stubs only. Was
that intentionally?
On Mar 21, 2009, at 12:29 AM, cgutman(a)svn.reactos.org wrote:
Author: cgutman
Date: Sat Mar 21 00:29:53 2009
New Revision: 40142
URL:
http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=40142&view=rev
Log:
- Reorganize NDIS code
Added:
trunk/reactos/drivers/network/ndis/ndis/30stubs.c
- copied, changed from r40140, trunk/reactos/drivers/network/
ndis/ndis/40gone.c
trunk/reactos/drivers/network/ndis/ndis/40stubs.c
- copied, changed from r40141, trunk/reactos/drivers/network/
ndis/ndis/50gone.c
trunk/reactos/drivers/network/ndis/ndis/50stubs.c
- copied, changed from r40113, trunk/reactos/drivers/network/
ndis/ndis/stubs.c
trunk/reactos/drivers/network/ndis/ndis/misc.c (with props)
Removed:
trunk/reactos/drivers/network/ndis/ndis/40gone.c
trunk/reactos/drivers/network/ndis/ndis/50gone.c
trunk/reactos/drivers/network/ndis/ndis/stubs.c