I have a question: where is the list of unresolved issues?

On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 21:01:30 +1000, Aleksey Bragin <aleksey@reactos.org> wrote:

As for existing 0.3.12-milestone entries in the BugZilla, I think they fully make sense because vast majority of them are regressions, and most of them already have one or another solution ready.

Please allow a few more days of the trunk feature freeze, until the list of unresolved 0.3.12 issues is empty. I know how much annoying that is, but it's for the good of the project.

WBR,
Aleksey Bragin.

On Sep 14, 2010, at 9:41 PM, Olaf Siejka wrote:

As we progress into regression fixing, we are now in the good moment to decide upon upcoming release. It would be great if we could manage with the 0.3.12 for the October Chemnitz event, where we are invited again to participate, not to mention that its the time for such release.

Right now, in my opinion we should decide without futher delay on the following:
- reviewing the REGRESSION list, this is - to confirm entries with 0.3.12 milestone already set, as well as doublecheck the rest, to see if any should be promoted to said milestone. This is the action of most utter importance, as there is no way to know how much time will be spent on futher research, testing and fixing them;
- decide upon bugs originated with last ole/comctl sync - are we haxing them locally, risking another winesync or perhaps reverting?
- reviewing patches stored at http://www.reactos.org/wiki/Bug_Filters as well as deciding if any should be adapted for current release.

Those actions, first of them especially, should be performed as swift as possible, else we might risk considerable delay and nervous finish before the Chemnitz.




--
Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.
Teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime.
Give a man religion and he will die praying for a fish.