Re: [ros-dev] Excuse me. What way...?

[Magnus Olsen]

Hi
I think B) will need alot of memmory and cpu power when it comes more that 1
user.
A) will need less memmory and smaller cpu power ageinsts B)
I would like see ros take small cpu power and memmory as posiblty


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <ea(a)iol.it>
To: "ros-dev" <ros-dev(a)reactos.com>
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 2:08 AM
Subject: [ros-dev] Excuse me. What way...?


>   Hi all!
>
>  I post this message, because I would like to read you comments and 
opinions
>   about the way to take to implement multiuser support
> in the Win32 
subsystem of
>   ReactOS. Multiuser support for Win32 is, in fact,
> named "terminal 
services".
>  
>  There are, as you know, two possible ways. Microsoft was at the same 
crossroad,
>   when they had to make Win32 in NT 4.0 multiuser.
>
>  a) make multiuser compliant csrss.exe+win32k.sys
>
>  b) load separate instances of csrss.exe+win32k.sys
>
>  B is obviously less expensive, because you do not touch the code in 
csrss.exe
>   and in win32k.sys and therefore you need no more
> debugging than regular 
single
>   user Win32. It is a hack, but it sells very well.
>
>  But Microsoft is committed to market. ReactOS isn't.
>
>  Obviously, as I like challenges (otherwise why would you devote your time 
to a
>   project like ReactOS?), and clean design in software,
> I vote for 
implementing (a).
>  
>  Please comment about:
>  - easy/hard;
>  - compatible/incompatible;
>  - impact on current design;
>  - huh?
>
>
>
>  ____________________________________________________________
>  Navighi a 2 MEGA e i primi 3 mesi sono GRATIS.
>  Scegli Libero Adsl Flat senza limiti su http://www.libero.it
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.com
>  http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev