RE: [ros-dev] Undocumented APIs

[Casper Hornstrup]

>   In general, I agree with you, but I do have 2
> remarks:
>  
>  1) What about Internet Explorer? According to your proposal, we can't
>  implement an API if IE is the only app we find that depends on it.
>  Personally, I'd rather use Firefox anyway, but there is some stuff out
>  there
>  that depends on IE. 
I worded it very carefully so software like IE isn't excluded. IE is not
only distributed with Windows. Regedit is however only distributed with
Windows.

>   2) Should this be limited to APIs or include
> undocumented data structures
>  too? An example I ran into last night: KPRCB. We know it's out there, some
>  of the fields are listed (e.g. by Probert) but I couldn't find any
>  "official" documentation.
>  
>  GvG 
I would be pro reformulating it to include structures and fields of
structures.

Casper