Re: [ros-dev] Re : Cmake result differences

[Zachary Gorden]

Doesn't do the rest of us much good in that case. :p

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Aleksey Bragin <aleksey(a)reactos.org> wrote:
>   This is not true anymore (at least last 6 or more
> months). I have a local
>  working copy which allows conditional building of either "trunk" or
>  "arwinss" win32 subsystem DLLs and win32k.sys.
>  Changes are, of course, not committed. But building arwinss ISO is as easy
>  as typing "makex bootcd".
>
>  WBR,
>  Aleksey.
>
>
>  On 01.03.2012 22:19, Zachary Gorden wrote:
> >  
> >  Last I heard there was no automated mechanism to build an arwinss
> >  image.  Aleksey has been copying arwinss binaries by hand into a
> >  vanilla ROS build before making the image.  Until someone with enough
> >  motivation automates this, the rate of arwinss updates will remain at
> >  the current pace.
> >
> >  On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Bernd Blaauw<bblaauw(a)home.nl>  wrote:
> > >
> > > Op 1-3-2012 1:04, Sylvain Petreolle schreef:
> > >
> > >
> > >> The Arwinss builds are available on SourceForge:
> > >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/reactos/files/Arwinss/
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks for pointing those test releases out. I guess the rate of changes
> > > and
> > > limited number of build machines might make an each-revision (just like
> > > Cmake live and bootcds) out of the question. Same for MSVC builds and the
> > > (highly?) experimental 64bit builds.
> > > 
>  _______________________________________________
>  Ros-dev mailing list
>  Ros-dev(a)reactos.org
>  http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev