29 Jan
2009
29 Jan
'09
11:49 a.m.
Ged wrote:
I think we all knew kjk was going to rudely
disapprove, most other people
seem to like it though.
I could find it poor and amateurish in a nicer way, if you like. Would
that change anything?
It's certainly a nice change from lake.bmp, even
if it is a blatant copy of
Vista.
It's not a blatant copy of Vista. It is, at best, a Vista wannabe, but I
just don't see the similarity. You mean the "digital reproduction of
works of art" Vista backgrounds? the "professional-quality nature and
landscapes photos" backgrounds? or the "abstract designs with more than
one color and without the product logo awkwardly crammed somewhere"
backgrounds? I just don't see it
Maybe someone should tell the Vista graphics team
they're 'photoshop filter
amateurs' ;)
I'll get you some taste for your next birthday
