26 Nov
2004
26 Nov
'04
9:08 a.m.
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 09:13:09 +0100
"Casper Hornstrup" <chorns(a)users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
This is the wrong way to do it. A Namespace Service
Provider should be
written for DNS instead. See
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/winsock/wi….
DNS is a TCP/IP thing. Other protocols have their own namespace system so
ws2_32 should remain generic and not depend on dnsapi.
Casper
I don't doubt that the approach could be improved, but nobody else stepped
up to code this. My basic opinion is that functionality is better than
vapor, especially when it helps us exercise other parts of the system.
--
Here's a simple experiment. Stand on a train track between two locomotives
which are pushing on you with equal force in opposite directions. You will
exhibit no net motion. None the less, you may soon begin to notice that
something important is happening.
-- Robert Stirniman