13 Nov
2010
13 Nov
'10
3:14 a.m.
You could probably provide the compatibility on an NT 3.1 kernel if you
tried hard enough. After all that's where it all started; newer versions
just added more services and made a stupid mistake of putting the GUI in
kernel space (while it increased performance of the GUI significantly, it
also means the OS is now more vulnerable to crashes)
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 13:10:37 +1100, Ged Murphy <gedmurphy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The target is only win2k3 in the kernel. Everything
else is open to
discussion (in fact, IMO even the kernel compatibility is open to
--
Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.
Teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime.
Give a man religion and he will die praying for a fish.
discussion)
You should, and must, provide as much functionality as possible with the
latest versions of Windows.
You can still provide many of the capabilities of Windows 7 using only
an NT5.2 kernel. It's only the internal architecture which limits >this,
and in terms of many win7 capabilities, this kernel isn't a limiting
factor.
2010/11/13 Jérôme Gardou <jerome.gardou(a)laposte.net>
>
> As our target is win2k3 sp1 compatibility,